World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 38 5760 5350 2729 2489 98 18698

Allan Steckler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Allan Steckler between 1973 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Allan Steckler published across 47 years, from 1973 to 2019, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1993. 1 of the 98 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1993. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 3 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 6 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 8 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
1973 2019

98 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Allan Steckler: publications per year, 1973 to 2019
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 3
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 2
1979 1
1980 1
1981 1
1982 2
1983 0
1984 0
1985 3
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 6
1990 1
1991 3
1992 4
1993 12
1994 1
1995 4
1996 0
1997 3
1998 4
1999 2
2000 0
2001 2
2002 2
2003 5
2004 1
2005 1
2006 8
2007 2
2008 1
2009 5
2010 2
2011 0
2012 3
2013 5
2014 1
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
Total 98
Download as CSV

Allan Steckler publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allan Steckler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–103 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 98 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390 98
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Allan Steckler D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allan Steckler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278 38
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Allan Steckler is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Health Professions, with a particular focus on General Health Professions, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Information Systems, Clinical Psychology, and Infectious Diseases.

The main topics covered in Steckler's work include:

  • Education and Learning Interventions
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences Research and Education

Steckler has contributed to several recent publications, all hosted in UNC Libraries, covering various aspects of health interventions and evaluation:

  • "The Effect of a Communications Campaign on Middle School Students' Nutrition and Physical Activity: Results of the HEALTHY Study" (2020)
  • "Feasibility of Screening Adolescents for Suicide Risk in "Real-World" High School Settings" (2020)
  • "Process evaluation in a multisite, primary obesity-prevention trial in American Indian schoolchildren" (2020)
  • "Evaluating Nurses' Implementation of an Infant-Feeding Counseling Protocol for HIV-Infected Mothers: The Ban Study in Lilongwe, Malawi" (2020)
  • "Data to Action: Using Formative Research to Develop Intervention Programs to Increase Physical Activity in Adolescent Girls" (2020)

Steckler frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Joel Gittelsohn
  • Margaret Schneider
  • Stella L. Volpe
  • Sally Davis
  • Ellen Piwoz

The most common venue for Steckler's publications is UNC Libraries, where they have published at least eight works. Their research spans multiple disciplines related to health, policy implementation, and adolescent health behaviors.

Best Publications

  • An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs

    Kenneth R. McLeroy;Daniel Bibeau;Allan Steckler;Karen Glanz

  • Process evaluation for public health interventions and research

    Allan B. Steckler;Laura Linnan;Barbara A. Israel

  • Toward Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: An Introduction:

    Allan Steckler;Kenneth R. McLeroy;Robert M. Goodman;Sheryl T. Bird

  • A description of the social–ecological framework used in the trial of activity for adolescent girls (TAAG)

    John P. Elder;Leslie Lytle;James F. Sallis;Deborah Rohm Young

  • The importance of external validity.

    Allan Steckler;Kenneth R. McLeroy

  • Factors That Contribute to Effective Community Health Promotion Coalitions: A Study of 10 Project ASSIST Coalitions in North Carolina:

    Michelle Crozier Kegler;Allan Steckler;Kenneth Mcleroy;Sally Herndon Malek

  • Measuring the diffusion of innovative health promotion programs.

    Allan Steckler;Robert M. Goodman;Kenneth R. McLeroy;Sonia Davis

  • A model for the institutionalization of health promotion programs

    Robert M. Goodman;Allan Steckler

  • Formative Research in School and Community-Based Health Programs and Studies: “State of the Art” and the TAAG Approach

    Joel Gittelsohn;Allan Steckler;Carolyn C. Johnson;Charlotte Pratt

  • Development of Level of Institutionalization Scales for Health Promotion Programs

    Robert M. Goodman;Kenneth R. McLeroy;Allan B. Steckler;Rick H. Hoyle

  • Diffusion of Innovations in Schools: A Study of Adoption and Implementation of School-Based Tobacco Prevention Curricula:

    Laura K. McCormick;Allan B. Steckler;Kenneth R. McLeroy

  • How to Institutionalize Health Promotion Programs

    Allan Steckler;Robert M. Goodman

  • Feasibility of screening adolescents for suicide risk in real-world high school settings

    Denise Hallfors;Paul H. Brodish;Shereen Khatapoush;Victoria Sanchez

  • Health Education Intervention Strategies: Recommendations for Future Research

    Allan Steckler;John P. Allegrante;David Altman;Richard Brown

  • A critique of contemporary community health promotion approaches: based on a qualitative review of six programs in Maine

    Robert M. Goodman;Allan Steckler;Sandra Hoover;Randy Schwartz

  • Pathways process evaluation results: a school-based prevention trial to promote healthful diet and physical activity in American Indian third, fourth, and fifth grade students

    Allan Steckler;Becky Ethelbah;Catherine Jane Martin;Dawn Stewart

  • Social socience theory in health education: time for a new model?

    Kenneth R. McLeroy;Allan B. Steckler;Bruce Simons-Morton;Robert M. Goodman

  • Community coalitions for health promotion: summary and further reflections

    Kenneth R. McLeroy;Michelle Kegler;Allan Steckler;James M. Burdine

  • A multiple case study of implementation in 10 local Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina

    Michelle Crozier Kegler;Allan Steckler;Sally Herndon Malek;Kenneth McLeroy

  • Fidelity of implementation in a treatment effectiveness trial of Reconnecting Youth

    Victoria Sánchez;Allan Steckler;P Nitirat;D Hallfors

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth R. McLeroy
Kenneth R. McLeroy Texas A&M University
Joel Gittelsohn
Joel Gittelsohn Johns Hopkins University
Denise Dion Hallfors
Denise Dion Hallfors Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation
Kurt M. Ribisl
Kurt M. Ribisl University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Laura A. Linnan
Laura A. Linnan University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Leslie A. Lytle
Leslie A. Lytle University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Carolyn C. Johnson
Carolyn C. Johnson Tulane University
Adam O. Goldstein
Adam O. Goldstein University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Nell H. Gottlieb
Nell H. Gottlieb The University of Texas at Austin
Rick H. Hoyle
Rick H. Hoyle Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degree options and career directions. For those interested in psychology, affordability is often a key concern. If you are seeking a cost-effective option, consider the cheapest online degree in psychology to minimize student debt while securing a quality education.

Social work also offers flexible online study formats. Some masters in social work online programs feature easier admission processes, making them accessible for candidates from many backgrounds.

For advanced clinical training, aspiring psychologists may wish to look into online psyd programs. These programs prepare graduates for licensure and professional practice with a strong focus on applied psychology.

Those passionate about supporting families can fast-track their qualifications through marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by recognized agencies. Each educational pathway can lead to rewarding and impactful careers in helping professions.

Best Scientists Citing Allan Steckler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles