World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 37 6220 5777 1008 937 117 6262

Jeremy Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeremy Smith between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeremy Smith published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 1989. 13 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 1989. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 16 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 6 publications
1966 2025

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeremy Smith: publications per year, 1966 to 2025
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 16
1990 3
1991 2
1992 2
1993 3
1994 8
1995 3
1996 2
1997 6
1998 2
1999 2
2000 4
2001 4
2002 7
2003 2
2004 11
2005 6
2006 5
2007 7
2008 5
2009 6
2010 1
2011 1
2012 2
2013 1
2014 0
2015 1
2016 2
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 2
2023 3
2024 7
2025 6
Total 134
Download as CSV

Jeremy Smith publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 117 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 117
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeremy Smith D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272 37
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeremy Smith is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom and has contributed to multiple research areas primarily within medicine. Their publications span topics in surgery, psychiatry, toxicology, and health economics.

The scientist's recent published papers include the following:

  • Unnecessary use of radiology studies in the diagnosis of inguinal hernias: a retrospective cohort study (2020), Surgical Endoscopy
  • Toxicokinetics of the plasticizer, N-butylbenzenesulfonamide, in plasma and brain following oral exposure in rodents: Route, species, and sex comparison (2020), Toxicology Reports
  • Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists professional practice guidelines for the use of ketamine in psychiatric practice (2025), Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
  • Phenolic benzotriazoles: a class comparison of toxicokinetics of ultraviolet-light absorbers in male rats (2021), Xenobiotica
  • The college wage premium in the UK: decline and fall? (2024), Oxford Economic Papers

Jeremy Smith has frequently collaborated with several coauthors, including:

  • Bovas Abraham
  • Monica Adya
  • Georges Bastin
  • Keith Beven
  • Rajendra Bhansali

The researcher's work has appeared predominantly in the following publication venues:

  • Journal of Forecasting (5 publications)
  • Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine (2 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (2 publications)
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (1 publication)
  • Surgical Endoscopy (1 publication)

Smith's main field of study is medicine, with a focus on several subfields including:

  • Surgery
  • General Health Professions
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Economics and Econometrics

The key research topics covered in their publications comprise:

  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
  • Hernia repair and management
  • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging

Best Publications

  • Determinants of Degree Performance in UK Universities: A Statistical Analysis of the 1993 Student Cohort

    Jeremy Smith;Robin Andrew Naylor

  • Dropping out of university: A statistical analysis of the probability of withdrawal for UK university students

    Jeremy P. Smith;Robin A. Naylor

  • A Simple Explanation of the Forecast Combination Puzzle

    Jeremy Smith;Kenneth Frank Wallis

  • SEASONALITY AND THE ORDER OF INTEGRATION FOR CONSUMPTION

    Denise R. Osborn;A. P. L. Chui;Jeremy P. Smith;C. R. Birchenhall

  • Graduate Employability: Policy and Performance in Higher Education in the UK

    Jeremy Smith;Abigail McKnight;Robin Andrew Naylor

  • Am I missing something? The effects of absence from class on student performance

    Wiji Arulampalam;Robin Andrew Naylor;Jeremy Smith

  • Evaluating the forecast densities of linear and non‐linear models: applications to output growth and unemployment

    Michael P. Clements;Jeremy Smith

  • A Monte Carlo study of the forecasting performance of empirical SETAR models

    Michael P. Clements;Jeremy Smith

  • Uncertainty and disagreement in economic prediction: the Bank of England Survey of External Forecasters

    Gianna Boero;Jeremy Smith;Kenneth Frank Wallis

  • Factors affecting the probability of first year medical student dropout in the UK: a logistic analysis for the intake cohorts of 1980–92

    Wiji Arulampalam;Robin Andrew Naylor;Jeremy Smith

  • Schooling effects on subsequent university performance: evidence for the UK university population

    Jeremy Smith;Robin Naylor

  • Alternative procedures for converting qualitative response data to quantitative expectations: An application to Australian manufacturing

    Jeremy Smith;Michael McAleer

  • A hazard model of the probability of medical school drop‐out in the UK

    Wiji Arulampalam;Robin Andrew Naylor;Jeremy Smith

  • The Performance of Alternative Forecasting Methods for SETAR Models

    Michael P. Clements;Jeremy Smith

  • The Performance of Periodic Autoregressive Models in Forecasting Seasonal U.K. Consumption

    Denise R. Osborn;Jeremy P. Smith

  • Higher education outcomes, graduate employment and university performance indicators

    Massimiliano Bratti;Abigail McKnight;Robin Andrew Naylor;Jeremy Smith

  • Dropping out of medical school in the UK: explaining the changes over ten years.

    Wiji Arulampalam;Robin Andrew Naylor;Jeremy Smith

  • Testing for cointegration: power versus frequency of observation — further Monte Carlo results

    Jesus Otero;Jeremy Smith

  • Rapid Geographic Spread of a Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strain

    R. S. Roman;J. Smith;M. Walker;S. Byrne

  • Effects of in-class variation and student rank on the probability of withdrawal: cross-section and time-series analysis for UK university students

    Wiji Arulampalam;Robin Andrew Naylor;Jeremy Smith

  • A seasonal model of consumption

    C. R. Birchenhall;R. C. Bladen-Hovell;A. P. L. Chui;Denise R. Osborn

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin Naylor
Robin Naylor University of Warwick
Michael P. Clements
Michael P. Clements University of Reading
Kenneth F. Wallis
Kenneth F. Wallis University of Warwick
Michael McAleer
Michael McAleer Erasmus University Rotterdam
Iain McLean
Iain McLean University of Oxford
Denise R. Osborn
Denise R. Osborn University of Manchester
Philip Hans Franses
Philip Hans Franses Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dick van Dijk
Dick van Dijk Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse career options. Many students choose online programs for their flexibility and affordability. If you're interested in counseling, consider schools that offer cacrep accredited online counseling degrees, which often meet state licensure requirements and industry standards.

Specializing in family support? Marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by trusted bodies can lead to rewarding roles helping families and couples. Psychology remains a popular choice for those drawn to understanding behavior. Choosing from the best online psychology degrees gives you the flexibility to balance your studies and life commitments.

For aspiring social workers, there are also online msw program options that are accessible yet rigorous, paving the way to advanced practice or advocacy roles. Each path offers meaningful ways to make an impact while gaining in-demand skills for today’s workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Jeremy Smith

Trending Scientists