World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 51 5510 5064 448 407 111 10279

Iain P. Chessell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Iain P. Chessell between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Iain P. Chessell published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2007. 7 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2007. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
1994 2025

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Iain P. Chessell: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 2
1998 5
1999 2
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 7
2005 5
2006 16
2007 21
2008 13
2009 9
2010 2
2011 5
2012 5
2013 1
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
2017 5
2018 2
2019 2
2020 1
2021 1
2022 4
2023 3
2024 3
2025 4
Total 125
Download as CSV

Iain P. Chessell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iain P. Chessell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 111 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505 111
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Iain P. Chessell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iain P. Chessell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425 51
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Iain P. Chessell is affiliated with AstraZeneca in the United Kingdom and focuses on research within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Molecular Biology, Sensory Systems, and Neurology.

The scientist's research topics encompass a variety of areas with an emphasis on mechanisms and treatments related to neurological and sensory conditions. Key topics include:

  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Gastrointestinal Motility and Disorders
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments

Their research is represented in frequent publication venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cephalalgia
  • European Journal of Epidemiology
  • Cell Reports Medicine
  • The Journal of Physiology

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Iain P. Chessell are:

  • The Dementias Platform UK (DPUK) Data Portal, 2020, European Journal of Epidemiology
  • A novel, injury-free rodent model of vulnerability for assessment of acute and preventive therapies reveals temporal contributions of CGRP-receptor activation in migraine-like pain, 2020, Cephalalgia
  • Characterization and preclinical evaluation of a protease activated receptor 2 (PAR2) monoclonal antibody as a preventive therapy for migraine, 2020, Cephalalgia
  • Direct activation of KCC2 arrests benzodiazepine refractory status epilepticus and limits the subsequent neuronal injury in mice, 2023, Cell Reports Medicine
  • Sensitization of colonic nociceptors by TNFα is dependent on TNFR1 expression and p38 MAPK activity, 2022, The Journal of Physiology

Iain P. Chessell has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Fraser Welsh
  • James P. Higham
  • Luke A. Pattison
  • Ewan St. John Smith
  • David C. Bulmer

Best Publications

  • Disruption of the P2X7 purinoceptor gene abolishes chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain

    Iain P. Chessell;Jonathan P. Hatcher;Chas Bountra;Anton D. Michel

  • Up-Regulation of P2X4 Receptors in Spinal Microglia after Peripheral Nerve Injury Mediates BDNF Release and Neuropathic Pain

    Lauriane Ulmann;Jon P. Hatcher;Jane P. Hughes;Séverine Chaumont

  • COX-2, CB2 and P2X7-immunoreactivities are increased in activated microglial cells/macrophages of multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spinal cord

    Yiangos Yiangou;Paul Facer;Pascal F Durrenberger;Iain P. Chessell

  • Psychophysical and functional imaging evidence supporting the presence of central sensitization in a cohort of osteoarthritis patients.

    Stephen E. Gwilym;John R. Keltner;Catherine E. Warnaby;Andrew J. Carr

  • The Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Nav1.9 Is an Effector of Peripheral Inflammatory Pain Hypersensitivity

    Fumimasa Amaya;Haibin Wang;Michael Costigan;Andrew J. Allchorne

  • The putative cannabinoid receptor GPR55 plays a role in mechanical hyperalgesia associated with inflammatory and neuropathic pain

    Penny C. Staton;Jon P. Hatcher;Deborah J. Walker;Alastair D. Morrison

  • Burning mouth syndrome as a trigeminal small fibre neuropathy: Increased heat and capsaicin receptor TRPV1 in nerve fibres correlates with pain score

    Zehra Yilmaz;Tara Renton;Y Yiangou;J Zakrzewska

  • Differential expression of the capsaicin receptor TRPV1 and related novel receptors TRPV3, TRPV4 and TRPM8 in normal human tissues and changes in traumatic and diabetic neuropathy

    Paul Facer;Maria A Casula;Graham D Smith;Christopher D Benham

  • An fMRI study of cerebral processing of brush-evoked allodynia in neuropathic pain patients.

    Petra Schweinhardt;Chris Glynn;Jonathan C. W. Brooks;Jonathan C. W. Brooks;Henry McQuay

  • Changes in the expression of NaV1.7, NaV1.8 and NaV1.9 in a distinct population of dorsal root ganglia innervating the rat knee joint in a model of chronic inflammatory joint pain.

    Iain T. Strickland;Jo C. Martindale;Peter L. Woodhams;Alison J. Reeve

  • TREM2 shedding by cleavage at the H157-S158 bond is accelerated for the Alzheimer's disease-associated H157Y variant.

    Peter Thornton;Jean Sevalle;Michael J Deery;Graham Fraser

  • Localization and Functional Expression of Splice Variants of the P2X 2 Receptor

    Joseph Simon;Emma J Kidd;Fiona M Smith;Iain P Chessell

  • TRPA1 receptor localisation in the human peripheral nervous system and functional studies in cultured human and rat sensory neurons.

    U. Anand;W.R. Otto;P. Facer;N. Zebda

  • Cannabinoid receptor CB2 localisation and agonist-mediated inhibition of capsaicin responses in human sensory neurons.

    Uma Anand;William R. Otto;Daniel Sanchez-Herrera;Paul Facer

  • GW274150, a novel and highly selective inhibitor of the inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), shows analgesic effects in rat models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain.

    Jorge De Alba;Nick M. Clayton;Sue D. Collins;Philip Colthup

  • Investigation into the neural correlates of emotional augmentation of clinical pain

    Petra Schweinhardt;Petra Schweinhardt;Nicola Kalk;Karolina Wartolowska;Iain Chessell

  • Discovery of 2-[(2,4-dichlorophenyl)amino]-N-[(tetrahydro- 2H-pyran-4-yl)methyl]-4-(trifluoromethyl)- 5-pyrimidinecarboxamide, a selective CB2 receptor agonist for the treatment of inflammatory pain.

    Gerard M. P. Giblin;Celestine T. O'Shaughnessy;Alan Naylor;William L. Mitchell

  • Prostanoid receptor EP1 and Cox-2 in injured human nerves and a rat model of nerve injury: a time-course study.

    Pascal F Durrenberger;Paul Facer;Maria A Casula;Yiangos Yiangou

  • Novel histamine H3 receptor antagonists GSK189254 and GSK334429 are efficacious in surgically-induced and virally-induced rat models of neuropathic pain

    Stephen J. Medhurst;Sue D. Collins;Andy Billinton;Sharon Bingham

  • P2X7 receptors on microglial cells mediate injury to cortical neurons in vitro

    Stephen D. Skaper;Laura Facci;Ainsley A. Culbert;Nicholas A. Evans

  • Attenuation of experimental arthritis in TRPV1R knockout mice.

    N J Barton;D S McQueen;D Thomson;S D Gauldie

Frequent Co-Authors

Irene Tracey
Irene Tracey University of Oxford
Praveen Anand
Praveen Anand Imperial College London
Petra Schweinhardt
Petra Schweinhardt University of Zurich
Jill C. Richardson
Jill C. Richardson MSD (United Kingdom)
John B. Davis
John B. Davis University of Oxford
Jonathan C W Brooks
Jonathan C W Brooks University of Bristol
Michael Costigan
Michael Costigan Boston Children's Hospital
Michael J. Rowan
Michael J. Rowan Trinity College Dublin
Adriano G. Rossi
Adriano G. Rossi University of Edinburgh
Nancy Y. Lee
Nancy Y. Lee Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Neuroscience in the USA, it’s important to consider your future career options and education pathways. Neuroscience offers diverse opportunities, but selecting the right degree or certification can impact your long-term success.

If salary is a key factor in your decision, you might want to explore degrees that make the most money. Many STEM and health-focused majors offer excellent earning potential, including neuroscience and related fields.

Affordability matters too. Fortunately, there are cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa, making it easier to pursue your goals without overwhelming student debt, even if you choose an online program.

If flexibility or specialization is important, consider online certification courses. These can boost your resume and help you transition into high-demand roles in healthcare, technology, or research.

For those seeking accessible programs, check out the easiest online bachelor's degree options. These can provide a streamlined academic experience and are ideal for working professionals or those balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Iain P. Chessell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles