World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7391 6892 3991 3627 81 13155

Jay G. Hull publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jay G. Hull between 1962 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jay G. Hull published across 60 years, from 1962 to 2021, averaging 1.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2014. 2 of the 93 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2014. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 7 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication
1962 2021

93 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jay G. Hull: publications per year, 1962 to 2021
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 2
1980 0
1981 4
1982 1
1983 7
1984 0
1985 0
1986 7
1987 4
1988 3
1989 0
1990 1
1991 4
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 4
2004 3
2005 1
2006 2
2007 0
2008 3
2009 4
2010 2
2011 4
2012 1
2013 2
2014 9
2015 6
2016 3
2017 1
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
2021 1
Total 93
Download as CSV

Jay G. Hull publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay G. Hull sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 81 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 81
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jay G. Hull D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay G. Hull sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jay G. Hull is affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States. Their research spans several fields including Medicine and Psychology, with specific subfields such as Applied Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's work focuses on key topics including:

  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Jay G. Hull has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including Benjamin W. Corn, David B. Feldman, Mark Allen O'Rourke, and Marie Bakitas.

Their recent publication activity includes work published in the journal Cancer. One notable paper is:

  • Dispositional hope as a potential outcome parameter among patients with advanced malignancy: An analysis of the ENABLE database (2021, Cancer)

This publication relates closely to their research interests in optimism, hope, and well-being, as well as palliative care. The cited work includes analysis of patient outcomes in advanced malignancy, addressing psychological and clinical parameters.

Jay G. Hull has contributed primarily to journals focused on cancer research and psychological aspects of healthcare, integrating medical and applied psychological perspectives in their work.

Best Publications

  • Effects of a Palliative Care Intervention on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Cancer: The Project ENABLE II Randomized Controlled Trial

    Marie Bakitas;Kathleen Doyle Lyons;Mark T. Hegel;Stefan Balan

  • Early Versus Delayed Initiation of Concurrent Palliative Oncology Care: Patient Outcomes in the ENABLE III Randomized Controlled Trial

    Marie A. Bakitas;Tor D. Tosteson;Zhigang Li;Kathleen D. Lyons

  • Social and behavioral consequences of alcohol consumption and expectancy: a meta-analysis.

    Jay G. Hull;Charles F. Bond

  • A self-awareness model of the causes and effects of alcohol consumption.

    Jay G. Hull

  • Benefits of Early Versus Delayed Palliative Care to Informal Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Cancer: Outcomes From the ENABLE III Randomized Controlled Trial

    J. Nicholas Dionne-Odom;Andres Azuero;Kathleen D. Lyons;Jay G. Hull

  • Hardiness and health: a critique and alternative approach.

    Jay G. Hull;Ronald R. Van Treuren;Suzanne Virnelli

  • Emotional reactions to dramatic film stimuli: The influence of cognitive and emotional empathy.

    Mark H. Davis;Jay G. Hull;Richard D. Young;Gregory G. Warren

  • The hidden costs of hidden stigma.

    L. Smart;D. M. Wegner;T. F. Heatherton;R. E. Kleck

  • The social psychology of stigma.

    Todd F. Heatherton

  • The organizational functions of the self: An alternative to the Duval and Wicklund Model of self-awareness.

    Jay G. Hull;Alan S. Levy

  • A self-awareness model of the causes and effects of alcohol consumption.

    Unknown

  • Self-consciousness, self-esteem, and success-failure as determinants of alcohol consumption in male social drinkers.

    Jay G. Hull;Richard David Young

  • Metaanalysis of the relationship between violent video game play and physical aggression over time

    Anna T. Prescott;James D. Sargent;Jay G. Hull

  • Self-awareness-reducing effects of alcohol consumption.

    Jay G. Hull;Robert W. Levenson;Richard David Young;Kenneth J. Sher

  • The project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial to improve palliative care for rural patients with advanced cancer: baseline findings, methodological challenges, and solutions.

    Marie Bakitas;Kathleen Doyle Lyons;Mark T. Hegel;Stefan Balan

  • Reliability and Validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care (FACIT-Pal) Scale

    Kathleen Doyle Lyons;Marie Bakitas;Mark T. Hegel;Brett Hanscom

  • Social Support, Depression, and Activities of Daily Living in Older Heart Surgery Patients

    Thomas E. Oxman;Jay G. Hull

  • Applications of the self-awareness model of alcohol consumption: predicting patterns of use and abuse.

    Jay G. Hull;Richard David Young;Ernest Jouriles

  • A general approach to testing multifaceted personality constructs.

    Jay G. Hull;Daniel A. Lehn;Judith C. Tedlie

  • The nonconsciousness of self-consciousness.

    Jay G. Hull;Laurie B. Slone;Karen B. Meteyer;Amanda R. Matthews

  • Awareness and self-perception: Verbal reports on internal states.

    Timothy D. Wilson;Jay G. Hull;Jim Johnson

  • Alcohol and self-regulation.

    Jay G. Hull;Laurie B. Slone

  • Effects of a Palliative Care Intervention on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Cancer

    Kathleen Doyle Lyons;Mark T. Hegel;Stefan Balan;Frances C. Brokaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Tor D. Tosteson
Tor D. Tosteson Dartmouth College
Tim A. Ahles
Tim A. Ahles Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
James D. Sargent
James D. Sargent Dartmouth College
Todd F. Heatherton
Todd F. Heatherton Dartmouth College
Stephen J. Bartels
Stephen J. Bartels Harvard University
Timothy D. Wilson
Timothy D. Wilson University of Virginia
Christopher S. Martin
Christopher S. Martin University of Pittsburgh
Robert W. Levenson
Robert W. Levenson University of California, Berkeley
Kenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees and fulfilling career pathways. Many reputable universities across the U.S. now offer online psychology programs designed for flexibility and career advancement.

When choosing a graduate or undergraduate program, it’s important to consider program value and job placement rates. For those in the Southwest, the most valuable psychology programs in Arizona are recognized for their strong academic reputation and extensive alumni networks. If you are located in the Pacific, the most valuable psychology programs in Hawaii highlight top institutions that provide diverse cultural perspectives.

For students in the Southeast, the most valuable psychology degrees in Jacksonville offer competitive programs with excellent career support services. Those considering a move to the Northeast can explore the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in New Jersey for high-quality education and strong employment prospects.

Whether you choose to study online or in-person, a psychology degree can prepare you for roles in mental health, education, research, human resources, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Jay G. Hull

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles