World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 162 116 101 89 75 599 89582

Michael J. Welsh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael J. Welsh between 1962 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael J. Welsh published across 65 years, from 1962 to 2026, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2003. 10 of the 652 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2003. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 2 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 7 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 11 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 16 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 11 publications 1990: 23 publications 1991: 18 publications 1992: 22 publications 1993: 18 publications 1994: 18 publications 1995: 25 publications 1996: 20 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 23 publications 1999: 24 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 41 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 2 publications
1962 2026

652 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael J. Welsh: publications per year, 1962 to 2026
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 2
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 1
1977 2
1978 6
1979 2
1980 7
1981 2
1982 6
1983 11
1984 7
1985 7
1986 16
1987 10
1988 9
1989 11
1990 23
1991 18
1992 22
1993 18
1994 18
1995 25
1996 20
1997 13
1998 23
1999 24
2000 19
2001 18
2002 13
2003 41
2004 16
2005 14
2006 9
2007 13
2008 18
2009 14
2010 10
2011 14
2012 17
2013 8
2014 14
2015 9
2016 20
2017 7
2018 6
2019 5
2020 7
2021 12
2022 9
2023 9
2024 15
2025 8
2026 2
Total 652
Download as CSV

Michael J. Welsh publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Welsh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 597–606 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 599 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23 599
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael J. Welsh D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Welsh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 162–163 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 162 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13 162
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in United States Leader Award
  • 2000 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1999 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Enzyme
  • DNA

Michael J. Welsh spends much of his time researching Cell biology, Heat shock protein, Glucocorticoid receptor, Cytoplasm and Biochemistry. His work on Mitosis as part of general Cell biology study is frequently linked to Cleavage furrow, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Heat shock protein, Nucleus, Phosphorylation and Binding site is strongly linked to Chaperone.

His work in Glucocorticoid receptor addresses subjects such as Molecular biology, which are connected to disciplines such as Glucocorticoid, Receptor expression, Cell nucleus and Chinese hamster ovary cell. In the field of Biochemistry, his study on HSPA2, HSPA4, Size-exclusion chromatography and Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases overlaps with subjects such as HSPA12A. His Actinin, alpha 1 research includes elements of Endocrinology, Internal medicine and Actin.

His most cited work include:

  • REGULATION OF THE TESTIS SERTOLI CELL BY FOLLICLE STIMULATING HORMONE (216 citations)
  • Calcium-dependent regulator protein: localization in mitotic apparatus of eukaryotic cells. (193 citations)
  • Hormone-free mouse glucocorticoid receptors overexpressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells are localized to the nucleus and are associated with both hsp70 and hsp90 (175 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Michael J. Welsh mainly investigates Cell biology, Endocrinology, Internal medicine, Molecular biology and Sertoli cell. The Cell biology study combines topics in areas such as Heat shock protein and Calmodulin. His Endocrinology study incorporates themes from Epithelium and Andrology.

His Internal medicine study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Protein phosphorylation and Akt/PKB signaling pathway. Michael J. Welsh has included themes like Gene expression, Gene, DNA and Cytoskeleton in his Molecular biology study. His biological study deals with issues like In vitro, which deal with fields such as Stimulation.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Cell biology (42.86%)
  • Endocrinology (23.81%)
  • Internal medicine (23.81%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2001-2018)?

  • Cell biology (42.86%)
  • Molecular biology (24.60%)
  • Gene (7.14%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Michael J. Welsh mainly focuses on Cell biology, Molecular biology, Gene, Gene expression and Genetics. His Cell biology research includes elements of Endocrinology and Contraction. The concepts of his Endocrinology study are interwoven with issues in Cancer and Cancer research.

As a part of the same scientific family, Michael J. Welsh mostly works in the field of Molecular biology, focusing on DNA and, on occasion, Subcloning. His work on RNA, SMN1, Dot blot and Northwestern blot is typically connected to RNA Helicase A as part of general Gene study, connecting several disciplines of science. His Gene expression research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Downregulation and upregulation and Computational biology.

Between 2001 and 2018, his most popular works were:

  • The sperm outer dense fiber protein is the 10th member of the superfamily of mammalian small stress proteins (127 citations)
  • Interaction of human HSP22 (HSPB8) with other small heat shock proteins (112 citations)
  • Interactions of HSP22 (HSPB8) with HSP20, αB-crystallin, and HSPB3 (76 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Enzyme
  • DNA

Hsp27, Cell biology, Biochemistry, Heat shock protein and Phosphorylation are his primary areas of study. Many of his studies on Cell biology apply to Integrin as well. His study looks at the intersection of Biochemistry and topics like Förster resonance energy transfer with Cardiac muscle, Small Heat-Shock Proteins, Yeast, Total protein and αb crystallin.

His Heat shock protein study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Filamentous actin, Actin cytoskeleton, Pancreas, Molecular biology and Acute pancreatitis. In his research on the topic of Phosphorylation, Endothelium, Tumor necrosis factor alpha, Endothelial stem cell and Signal transduction is strongly related with Kinase. His work carried out in the field of Signal transduction brings together such families of science as Endocrinology and Internal medicine.

Best Publications

  • Regulation of the testis sertoli cell by follicle stimulating hormone.

    A. R. Means;J. R. Dedman;J. S. Tash;D. J. Tindall

  • Calcium-dependent regulator protein: localization in mitotic apparatus of eukaryotic cells.

    Michael J. Welsh;John R. Dedman;B. R. Brinkley;Anthony R. Means

  • Tubulin and calmodulin. Effects of microtubule and microfilament inhibitors on localization in the mitotic apparatus.

    M J Welsh;J R Dedman;B R Brinkley;A R Means

  • Heat shock protein 90-dependent (geldanamycin-inhibited) movement of the glucocorticoid receptor through the cytoplasm to the nucleus requires intact cytoskeleton

    Mario D. Galigniana;Jennifer L. Scruggs;James Herrington;Michael J. Welsh

  • Rat sertoli cells: a rapid method for obtaining viable cells.

    Michael J. Welsh;John P. Wiebe

  • Ca2+-dependent regulator. Production and characterization of a monospecific antibody.

    J R Dedman;M J Welsh;A R Means

  • Hormone-free mouse glucocorticoid receptors overexpressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells are localized to the nucleus and are associated with both hsp70 and hsp90

    E. R. Sanchez;M. Hirst;L. C. Scherrer;Hsin-Yi Tang

  • Small Heat-Shock Protein Family: Function in Health and Disease

    Michael J. Welsh;Mattias Gaestel

  • Cadmium in vivo causes disruption of tight junction-associated microfilaments in rat Sertoli cells.

    Kok-Wah Hew;Georgia L. Heath;Asmina H. Jiwa;Michael J. Welsh

  • Evidence that the FK506-binding immunophilin heat shock protein 56 is required for trafficking of the glucocorticoid receptor from the cytoplasm to the nucleus.

    Michael J. Czar;Robert H. Lyons;Michael J. Welsh;Jack Michel Renoir

  • A single low cadmium dose causes failure of spermiation in the rat.

    Kok-Wah Hew;W. A. Ericson;M. J. Welsh

  • The sperm outer dense fiber protein is the 10th member of the superfamily of mammalian small stress proteins

    Jean-Marc Fontaine;Joshua S. Rest;Michael J. Welsh;Rainer Benndorf

  • Interaction of human HSP22 (HSPB8) with other small heat shock proteins

    Xiankui Sun;Jean-Marc Fontaine;Joshua S. Rest;Eric A. Shelden

  • HSP22, a New Member of the Small Heat Shock Protein Superfamily, Interacts with Mimic of Phosphorylated HSP27 (3DHSP27)

    Rainer Benndorf;Xiankui Sun;Robert R. Gilmont;Kelli J. Biederman

  • Podocyte alpha-actinin induction precedes foot process effacement in experimental nephrotic syndrome

    William E. Smoyer;Peter Mundel;Avneesh Gupta;Michael J. Welsh

  • Evidence that the 90-kilodalton heat shock protein is associated with tubulin-containing complexes in L cell cytosol and in intact PtK cells.

    Edwin R. Sanchez;Timothy Redmond;Lawrence C. Scherrer;Emery H. Bresnick

  • Chaperone functions of the heat shock proteins associated with steroid receptors

    William B. Pratt;Michael J. Welsh

  • Interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor with the Mr 90,000 heat shock protein: an evolving model of ligand-mediated receptor transformation and translocation.

    William B. Pratt;Edwin R. Sanchez;Emery H. Bresnick;Soheil Meshinchi

  • Calmodulin binds to chick lens gap junction protein in a calcium-independent manner

    Michael J. Welsh;Jon C. Aster;Mark Ireland;Jose Alcala

  • Interactions of HSP22 (HSPB8) with HSP20, αB-crystallin, and HSPB3

    Jean-Marc Fontaine;Xiankui Sun;Rainer Benndorf;Michael J. Welsh

Frequent Co-Authors

William B. Pratt
William B. Pratt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Anthony R. Means
Anthony R. Means Baylor College of Medicine
John R. Dedman
John R. Dedman University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Emery H. Bresnick
Emery H. Bresnick University of Wisconsin–Madison
Mohammed N. Islam
Mohammed N. Islam University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
J. Richard McIntosh
J. Richard McIntosh University of Colorado Boulder
Jon C. Aster
Jon C. Aster Harvard Medical School
Margaret E. Gnegy
Margaret E. Gnegy University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John A. Williams
John A. Williams University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Derek L. Stemple
Derek L. Stemple Camena Bioscience

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re pursuing Biology or Biochemistry in the USA, it’s worth exploring related health and medical career options. A strong background in the sciences opens opportunities in fields like medical coding, billing, and health information management, all of which can be studied through flexible online programs.

Comparing the cpc vs ccs certifications helps you understand which credential aligns with your interests—CPC is often geared toward physician-based coding, while CCS focuses more on hospital coding. Each opens distinct job pathways and salary prospects.

Understanding medical.coder salary expectations can guide your career planning. Medical coding offers a predictable, stable income and is a field with continual demand. Interested in job outlook? Read about is medical billing and coding in demand to learn about current employment trends and growth rates in the industry.

Lastly, if you’re seeking flexibility, review the health information management online degree options for affordable accredited programs. These can help you enter or advance in the rapidly growing health informatics sector.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Welsh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles