World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
16163
World Ranking
7503
National Ranking
3230

Daniel H. O'Connor publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel H. O'Connor sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 115 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniel H. O'Connor D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel H. O'Connor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel H. O'Connor is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States and is active in neuroscience research, particularly focusing on neural dynamics and brain function. Their scholarly work spans various specialized fields within neuroscience and related disciplines.

The main fields of study for Daniel H. O'Connor include:

  • Neuroscience

Within neuroscience, their subfields of study cover:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Sensory Systems
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems

The primary topics of O'Connor's research encompass:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Among their frequent co-authors are:

  • William Olson
  • Jeong Jun Kim
  • Duo Xu
  • Samuel J. Sober
  • Yi-Ting Chang

Daniel H. O'Connor's publications often appear in journals and archives with a focus on neuroscience, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Cell Reports
  • Neuron
  • Neuroscience

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel H. O'Connor include:

  • "Neural activity in the mouse claustrum in a cross-modal sensory selection task" (2021) published in Neuron
  • "Cortical processing of flexible and context-dependent sensorimotor sequences" (2022) published in Nature
  • "Of mice and monkeys: Somatosensory processing in two prominent animal models" (2021) published in Progress in Neurobiology
  • "Locus coeruleus spiking differently correlates with S1 cortex activity and pupil diameter in a tactile detection task" (2021) published in eLife
  • "Myomatrix arrays for high-definition muscle recording" (2023) published in eLife

Best Publications

  • Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus.

    Daniel H. O'Connor;Miki M. Fukui;Mark A. Pinsk;Sabine Kastner

  • Nonlinear dendritic integration of sensory and motor input during an active sensing task

    Ning Long Xu;Mark T. Harnett;Stephen R. Williams;Daniel Huber;Daniel Huber

  • Multiple dynamic representations in the motor cortex during sensorimotor learning

    Daniel Huber;D.A. Gutnisky;S. Peron;D. H. O’Connor

  • Neural Activity in Barrel Cortex Underlying Vibrissa-Based Object Localization in Mice

    Daniel H. O'Connor;Simon P. Peron;Daniel Huber;Karel Svoboda

  • Learning-related fine-scale specificity imaged in motor cortex circuits of behaving mice.

    Takaki Komiyama;Takashi R. Sato;Daniel H. Oconnor;Ying Xin Zhang;Ying Xin Zhang

  • Procedures for behavioral experiments in head-fixed mice.

    Zengcai V. Guo;S. Andrew Hires;Nuo Li;Daniel H. O'Connor

  • Activity in motor–sensory projections reveals distributed coding in somatosensation

    Leopoldo Petreanu;Diego A. Gutnisky;Daniel Huber;Daniel Huber;Ning Long Xu

  • Vibrissa-Based Object Localization in Head-Fixed Mice

    Daniel H. O'Connor;Nathan G. Clack;Daniel Huber;Takaki Komiyama

  • The time course of competition for attention: attention is initially labile.

    Mary C. Potter;Adrian Staub;Daniel H. O'Connor

  • How silent is the brain: is there a "dark matter" problem in neuroscience?

    Shy Shoham;Shy Shoham;Daniel H. O’Connor;Ronen Segev

  • Graded bidirectional synaptic plasticity is composed of switch-like unitary events.

    Daniel H. O'Connor;Gayle M. Wittenberg;Samuel S.-H. Wang

  • Functional Imaging of the Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Pulvinar

    Sabine Kastner;Daniel H. O'Connor;Miki M. Fukui;Hilda M. Fehd

  • Neural coding during active somatosensation revealed using illusory touch

    Daniel H. O'Connor;S. Andrew Hires;Zengcai V. Guo;Nuo Li

  • Characterization and subcellular targeting of GCaMP-type genetically-encoded calcium indicators

    Tianyi Mao;Tianyi Mao;Daniel H. O'Connor;Daniel H. O'Connor;Volker Scheuss;Volker Scheuss;Volker Scheuss;Junichi Nakai

  • Sensory and decision-related activity propagate in a cortical feedback loop during touch perception

    Sung Eun Kwon;Hongdian Yang;Genki Minamisawa;Daniel H O'Connor

  • Origins of choice-related activity in mouse somatosensory cortex

    Hongdian Yang;Sung E Kwon;Kyle S Severson;Daniel H O'Connor

  • Rapid neurotransmitter uncaging in spatially defined patterns

    Shy Shoham;Daniel H. O'Connor;Dmitry V. Sarkisov;Samuel Sheng-Hung Wang

  • Automated Tracking of Whiskers in Videos of Head Fixed Rodents

    Nathan G. Clack;Daniel H. O'Connor;Daniel Huber;Leopoldo T. Petreanu

  • Reverse engineering the mouse brain

    Daniel H. O'Connor;Daniel Huber;Karel Svoboda

  • The Mechanical Variables Underlying Object Localization along the Axis of the Whisker

    L. Pammer;D. H. O'Connor;S. A. Hires;N. G. Clack

  • Recognition memory for briefly presented pictures: the time course of rapid forgetting.

    Mary C. Potter;Adrian Staub;Janina Rado;Daniel H. O'Connor

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew J. Pollard
Andrew J. Pollard University of Oxford
Karel Svoboda
Karel Svoboda Allen Institute
Daniel Huber
Daniel Huber University of Geneva
Matthew D. Snape
Matthew D. Snape University of Oxford
Samuel S.-H. Wang
Samuel S.-H. Wang Princeton University
Julian C. Knight
Julian C. Knight University of Oxford
Rory Bowden
Rory Bowden Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Shiranee Sriskandan
Shiranee Sriskandan Imperial College London
Matt J. Neville
Matt J. Neville University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience opens up diverse pathways, especially when combined with flexible study options. Many students are now considering 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees to fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner. These programs allow motivated learners to complete their studies more quickly while balancing other commitments.

When planning your academic journey, it's wise to consider future earning potential. Some related fields of study are recognized among the highest paid degrees and are also featured as most lucrative college majors. Neuroscience can lead to advanced roles in research, healthcare, and technology—fields that award strong compensation, especially for those who pursue specialized graduate training.

Affordability is another key factor. There are many online schools that accept fafsa, making quality education accessible and helping reduce overall debt. Taking advantage of financial aid and cost-effective online programs can make your educational journey more manageable while opening doors to rewarding neuroscience careers.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel H. O'Connor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles