World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
51
Citations
9821
World Ranking
3649
National Ranking
281

Michael Bode publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Bode sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 149 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Michael Bode D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Bode sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Bode is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, with a focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research spans several specialized subfields, including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Coronary Artery Anomalies

Michael Bode has published in a variety of academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • UNC Libraries
  • Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Scientific Reports
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions

Their recent papers provide insight into the scope of the research interests and include:

  • "The evolving role of cardiac imaging in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries," 2021, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
  • "The use of MitraClip to prevent posttranscatheter aortic valve replacement left ventricular "suicide"," 2020, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • "Cell type-specific roles of PAR1 in Coxsackievirus B3 infection," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Retrograde-Antegrade Snaring With Electrosurgery and Removal of a Ruptured Papillary Muscle," 2020, Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • "Expanding indications: hybrid surgicalpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) coronary revascularization of chronic total occlusions in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD)," 2022, Mini-invasive Surgery

Collaborations form an important part of this scientist's work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Suzanne J. Baron
  • Sherif B. Labib
  • Gautam Gadey
  • Weeranun D. Bode
  • Ingo Hilgendorf

Best Publications

  • Is conservation triage just smart decision making

    Madeleine C Bottrill;Liana N Joseph;Josie Carwardine;Michael Bode

  • Prioritizing global conservation efforts

    Kerrie A. Wilson;Marissa F. McBride;Michael Bode;Hugh P. Possingham

  • Fire management for biodiversity conservation: Key research questions and our capacity to answer them

    Don A. Driscoll;David B. Lindenmayer;Andrew F. Bennett;Michael Bode

  • Conserving biodiversity efficiently: what to do, where, and when.

    Kerrie A Wilson;Emma C Underwood;Scott A Morrison;Kirk R Klausmeyer

  • Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa

    Benis Egoh;Belinda Reyers;Mathieu Rouget;Michael Bode

  • Phenotype–environment mismatches reduce connectivity in the sea

    Dustin Marshall;Keyne Monro;M Bode;Michael Keough

  • Optimal Conservation Outcomes Require Both Restoration and Protection

    Hugh P. Possingham;Michael Bode;Carissa J. Klein

  • A guide to ecosystem models and their environmental applications

    William L. Geary;Michael Bode;Tim S. Doherty;Tim S. Doherty;Elizabeth A. Fulton;Elizabeth A. Fulton

  • Havens for threatened Australian mammals: the contributions of fenced areas and offshore islands to the protection of mammal species susceptible to introduced predators

    Sarah Legge;Sarah Legge;John C. Z. Woinarski;Andrew A. Burbidge;Russell Palmer

  • Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group

    Michael Bode;Kerrie A. Wilson;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Will R. Turner

  • Larval dispersal reveals regional sources and sinks in the Great Barrier Reef

    Michael Bode;Lance Bode;Paul R. Armsworth

  • Dispersal of grouper larvae drives local resource sharing in a coral reef fishery.

    Glenn R. Almany;Richard J. Hamilton;Michael Bode;Manuai Matawai

  • Effective conservation planning requires learning and adaptation

    Hedley S Grantham;Michael Bode;Eve McDonald-Madden;Edward T Game

  • Finite conservation funds mean triage is unavoidable

    Madeleine C Bottrill;Liana N Joseph;Josie Carwardine;Michael Bode

  • Larval fish dispersal in a coral-reef seascape

    Glenn R. Almany;Serge Planes;Simon R. Thorrold;Michael L. Berumen

  • Introduced species that overcome life history tradeoffs can cause native extinctions.

    Jane A. Catford;Michael Bode;David Tilman

  • Resolving conflicts in fire management using decision theory: asset-protection versus biodiversity conservation

    Don A. Driscoll;David B. Lindenmayer;Andrew F. Bennett;Michael Bode

  • Protecting Biodiversity when Money Matters: Maximizing Return on Investment

    Emma C. Underwood;M. Rebecca Shaw;Kerrie A. Wilson;Peter Kareiva

  • Dynamic marine protected areas can improve the resilience of coral reef systems

    Edward T. Game;Edward T. Game;Michael Bode;Eve McDonald-Madden;Hedley S. Grantham

  • Dispersal connectivity and reserve selection for marine conservation

    Stuart Kininmonth;Stuart Kininmonth;Maria Beger;Michael Bode;Michael Bode;Eric Peterson

  • Long-term shifts in the colony size structure of coral populations along the Great Barrier Reef

    Andreas Dietzel;Michael Bode;Michael Bode;Sean R Connolly;Sean R Connolly;Terry P Hughes

  • Large-scale, multidirectional larval connectivity among coral reef fish populations in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park

    David H. Williamson;Hugo B. Harrison;Glenn R. Almany;Glenn R. Almany;Michael L. Berumen

Frequent Co-Authors

Hugh P. Possingham
Hugh P. Possingham University of Queensland
Kerrie A. Wilson
Kerrie A. Wilson Queensland University of Technology
Brendan A. Wintle
Brendan A. Wintle University of Melbourne
Robert L. Pressey
Robert L. Pressey James Cook University
Sarah Legge
Sarah Legge Australian National University
Paul R. Armsworth
Paul R. Armsworth University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Eve McDonald-Madden
Eve McDonald-Madden University of Queensland
Glenn R. Almany
Glenn R. Almany Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Geoffrey P. Jones
Geoffrey P. Jones James Cook University
Nigel Mackman
Nigel Mackman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their skills beyond Ecology and Evolution, online degrees offer flexible and accessible pathways to diverse careers in science, healthcare, and education. Specialized options like direct entry msn online programs are available even for non-nursing majors, enabling a fast transition into advanced practice nursing roles.

When exploring online degree providers, it's important to compare schools to find the right fit. For example, you might look at differences between capella vs wgu rn to bsn programs when considering a move into nursing. Cost is another key factor—students aiming to advance their credentials efficiently can research bsn to msn online programs to find the most affordable routes.

Additionally, choosing a reputable institution matters. Many students prefer enrolling in a non profit online university for quality assurance and stronger academic support. With these options, the path from ecology and evolution studies to broader career opportunities is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Bode

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles