World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Meelis Mölder

Meelis Mölder

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
3959
World Ranking
9476
National Ranking
184

Meelis Mölder publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meelis Mölder sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 85 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Meelis Mölder D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meelis Mölder sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Meelis Mölder is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and has contributed extensively to the field of environmental science. Their research primarily focuses on areas such as global and planetary change, atmospheric science, ecology, environmental engineering, and nature and landscape conservation. The main topics of their work include plant water relations and carbon dynamics, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, climate variability and models, remote sensing in agriculture, remote sensing and LiDAR applications, fire effects on ecosystems, and meteorological phenomena and simulations.

Mölder's publications have appeared frequently in several scientific venues, with multiple papers published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Forests.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Mölder include:

  • The fingerprint of the summer 2018 drought in Europe on ground-based atmospheric CO2 measurements, 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Effects of drought and meteorological forcing on carbon and water fluxes in Nordic forests during the dry summer of 2018, 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Impacts of Clear-Cutting of a Boreal Forest on Carbon Dioxide, Methane and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes, 2020, Forests
  • Evaluation and optimization of ICOS atmosphere station data as part of the labeling process, 2021, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Modelling Daily Gross Primary Productivity with Sentinel-2 Data in the Nordic Region-Comparison with Data from MODIS, 2021, Remote Sensing

Mölder has collaborated with several frequent co-authors who have contributed to this body of work. These include Ivan Mammarella, Matthias Peichl, Michal Heliasz, Anders Lindroth, and Andreas Ibrom.

The scope of Mölder's research reflects a multidisciplinary approach within environmental science, bringing together remote sensing technologies, atmospheric measurements, and ecosystem modeling. Their work incorporates advanced methods for understanding the complex dynamics of carbon fluxes, drought impact, and forest management effects on greenhouse gas emissions.

Best Publications

  • Climate control of terrestrial carbon exchange across biomes and continents

    Chuixiang Yi;Daniel Ricciuto;Runze Li;John Wolbeck

  • Comparison of horizontal and vertical advective CO2 fluxes at three forest sites

    Christian Feigenwinter;Christian Bernhofer;Uwe Eichelmann;Bernard Heinesch

  • Flux-profile relationships over a boreal forest-roughness sublayer corrections

    Meelis Mölder;Achim Grelle;Anders Lindroth;Sven Halldin

  • Global transpiration data from sap flow measurements: the SAPFLUXNET database

    Rafael Poyatos;Víctor Granda;Víctor Flo;Mark A. Adams;Mark A. Adams

  • Heat storage in forest biomass improves energy balance closure

    Anders Lindroth;Meelis Mölder;Fredrik Lagergren

  • Net primary production and light use efficiency in a mixed coniferous forest in Sweden

    Frederik Lagergren;Lars Eklundh;Achim Grelle;Mattias Lundblad

  • ICOS eddy covariance flux-station site setup: a review

    Corinna Rebmann;Marc Aubinet;Hape Schmid;Nicola Arriga

  • Seasonal variation of carbon fluxes in a sparse savanna in semi arid Sudan

    Jonas Ardö;Meelis Mölder;Bashir Awad El-Tahir;Hatim Abdalla Mohammed Elkhidir

  • Seasonal variation of boreal forest surface conductance and evaporation

    A. Grelle;A. Lindroth;M. Mölder

  • Continuous long-term measurements of soil-plant-atmosphere variables at a forest site

    Lars-Christer Lundin;Sven Halldin;A. Lindroth;E. Cienciala

  • Land‐atmosphere exchange of methane from soil thawing to soil freezing in a high‐Arctic wet tundra ecosystem

    Torbern Tagesson;Meelis Mölder;Mikhail Mastepanov;Charlotte Sigsgaard

  • Thinning effects on pine-spruce forest transpiration in central Sweden

    Fredrik Lagergren;Harry Lankreijer;Jiri Kucera;Emil Cienciala

  • A new mass conservation approach to the study of CO2 advection in an alpine forest

    Leonardo Montagnani;Giovanni Manca;Elisa Canepa;Emilia Georgieva

  • Uncovering the critical soil moisture thresholds of plant water stress for European ecosystems

    Unknown

  • Leaf area index is the principal scaling parameter for both gross photosynthesis and ecosystem respiration of Northern deciduous and coniferous forests

    Anders Lindroth;Fredrik Lagergren;Mika Aurela;Brynhildur Bjarnadottir

  • Regional-scale CO 2 fluxes over central Sweden by a boundary layer budget method

    P.E. Levy;A. Grelle;A. Lindroth;M. Mölder

  • Towards long-term standardised carbon and greenhouse gas observations for monitoring Europe's terrestrial ecosystems: a review

    Daniela Franz;Manuel Acosta;Núria Altimir;Nicola Arriga

  • The fingerprint of the summer 2018 drought in Europe on ground-based atmospheric CO2 measurements.

    M. Ramonet;P. Ciais;F. Apadula;J. Bartyzel

  • Biophysical controls on CO2 fluxes of three Northern forests based on long-term eddy covariance data

    Fredrik Lagergren;Anders Lindroth;Ebba Dellwik;Andreas Ibrom

  • Effects of drought and meteorological forcing on carbon and water fluxes in Nordic forests during the dry summer of 2018

    Anders Lindroth;Jutta Holst;Maj-Lena Linderson;Mika Aurela

  • Vertical variability and effect of stability on turbulence characteristics down to the floor of a pine forest

    Samuli Launiainen;Timo Vesala;Meelis Mölder;Ivan Mammarella

  • Available energy and energy balance closure at four coniferous forest sites across Europe

    Uta Moderow;Marc Aubinet;Christian Feigenwinter;Christian Feigenwinter;Olaf Kolle

Frequent Co-Authors

Anders Lindroth
Anders Lindroth Lund University
Leif Klemedtsson
Leif Klemedtsson University of Gothenburg
Timo Vesala
Timo Vesala University of Helsinki
Andreas Ibrom
Andreas Ibrom Technical University of Denmark
Matthias Peichl
Matthias Peichl Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Leonardo Montagnani
Leonardo Montagnani Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Ivan Mammarella
Ivan Mammarella University of Helsinki
Corinna Rebmann
Corinna Rebmann Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Pasi Kolari
Pasi Kolari University of Helsinki
Mika Aurela
Mika Aurela Finnish Meteorological Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional Environmental Sciences, there are numerous online degree options that can complement or diversify your career path. Educators and professionals often explore advanced credentials such as 1 year phd programs online no dissertation, which offer a faster track to doctoral-level education without the lengthy dissertation process.

Many students seek flexible, respected programs, and the best online eds to edd programs provide a valuable route for those aiming to advance educational leadership skills, often applicable in environmental education settings.

If affordability is a priority, consider exploring the cheapest online dsw programs, which prepare graduates for impactful roles in social work, often intersecting with community and environmental well-being efforts.

Alternatively, a broad foundational degree such as the cheap online general studies degree can be a stepping stone for interdisciplinary career options combining environmental science with other fields.

Best Scientists Citing Meelis Mölder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles