What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Maxime Madder mostly deals with Tick, Veterinary medicine, Ecology, Ixodes ricinus and Dermacentor reticulatus.
His Tick research includes themes of Range and Babesia canis.
His study in the field of Culicoides is also linked to topics like Vector and Real-time polymerase chain reaction.
His Ixodes ricinus research incorporates elements of Ixodidae and Animal ecology.
His research in Animal ecology intersects with topics in Entomology, Rhipicephalus annulatus, Hyalomma marginatum and Acari.
His research investigates the connection with Dermacentor reticulatus and areas like Tick-borne disease which intersect with concerns in Ecology, Ixodes and Dermacentor.
His most cited work include:
- Detection of Schmallenberg virus in different Culicoides spp. by real-time RT-PCR. (173 citations)
- Detection of Schmallenberg virus in different Culicoides spp. by real-time RT-PCR. (173 citations)
- Ticks and associated pathogens collected from dogs and cats in Belgium. (77 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Tick, Veterinary medicine, Ecology, Ixodidae and Zoology.
In Tick, Maxime Madder works on issues like Theileria parva, which are connected to Rhipicephalus appendiculatus.
His study in Culicoides, Amblyomma variegatum, Dermacentor reticulatus, Culicoides obsoletus and Rhipicephalus sanguineus is done as part of Veterinary medicine.
As a part of the same scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Culicoides obsoletus, focusing on Schmallenberg virus and, on occasion, Orthobunyavirus.
His study in the field of Rhipicephalus annulatus also crosses realms of Piroplasmida.
His Acari research integrates issues from Entomology and Range.
He most often published in these fields:
- Tick (62.50%)
- Veterinary medicine (48.21%)
- Ecology (36.61%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2020)?
- Tick (62.50%)
- Population genetics (6.25%)
- Zoology (18.75%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Tick, Population genetics, Zoology, Theileria parva and Rhipicephalus microplus.
Maxime Madder's looking at Tick as part of his Veterinary medicine and Ecology and Tick study.
His Veterinary medicine study combines topics in areas such as Muscidae, Pathogen, Mark release recapture and Parasitology.
His Theileria parva study incorporates themes from East Coast fever and Gene flow.
Maxime Madder combines subjects such as Rhipicephalus, Livestock, Isolation by distance and Species distribution with his study of Rhipicephalus microplus.
His research on Rhipicephalus also deals with topics like
- Amitraz together with Drug resistance, Genetics and Tick Control,
- Acaricide together with Amblyomma cajennense and Anaplasma.
Between 2017 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Canine Leishmaniasis Control in the Context of One Health. (20 citations)
- Genotyping acaricide resistance profiles of Rhipicephalus microplus tick populations from communal land areas of Zimbabwe. (15 citations)
- Invasive cattle ticks in East Africa: morphological and molecular confirmation of the presence of Rhipicephalus microplus in south-eastern Uganda. (13 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Veterinary medicine, Tick, Rhipicephalus microplus, Ixodes ricinus and Tick-borne disease.
The concepts of his Veterinary medicine study are interwoven with issues in Muscidae, Stomoxys and Mark release recapture.
His Tick study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Drug resistance and Amitraz.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Rhipicephalus and Genetics.
His work carried out in the field of Ixodes ricinus brings together such families of science as Pathogen and Parasitology.
His Tick-borne disease study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Entomology, Livestock, Amblyomma variegatum and Species distribution.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
