World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
31
Citations
3894
World Ranking
6181
National Ranking
12

Stephen Mugo publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Mugo sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 96 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Stephen Mugo D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Mugo sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The metal silo: An effective grain storage technology for reducing post-harvest insect and pathogen losses in maize while improving smallholder farmers' food security in developing countries

    Tadele Tefera;Fred Kanampiu;Hugo De Groote;Jon Hellin

  • Molecular characterization of global maize breeding germplasm based on genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms.

    Yanli Lu;Yanli Lu;Jianbing Yan;Claudia T. Guimarães;Suketoshi Taba

  • Genetic Gains in Grain Yield Through Genomic Selection in Eight Bi-parental Maize Populations under Drought Stress

    Yoseph Beyene;Kassa Semagn;Stephen Mugo;Amsal Tarekegne

  • Resistance of maize varieties to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

    Fikremariam Abebe;Tadele Tefera;Stephen Mugo;Yoseph Beyene

  • Molecular characterization of diverse CIMMYT maize inbred lines from eastern and southern Africa using single nucleotide polymorphic markers

    Kassa Semagn;Cosmos Magorokosho;Bindiganavile S Vivek;Dan Makumbi

  • Meta-analyses of QTL for grain yield and anthesis silking interval in 18 maize populations evaluated under water-stressed and well-watered environments

    Kassa Semagn;Yoseph Beyene;Marilyn L Warburton;Amsal Tarekegne

  • Large-scale screening for maize drought resistance using multiple selection criteria evaluated under water-stressed and well-watered environments

    Yanli Lu;Yanli Lu;Zhuanfang Hao;Chuanxiao Xie;Jose Crossa

  • Improving Maize Grain Yield under Drought Stress and Non-stress Environments in Sub-Saharan Africa using Marker-Assisted Recurrent Selection

    Yoseph Beyene;Kassa Semagn;Jose Crossa;Stephen Mugo

  • Effects of insect population density and storage time on grain damage and weight loss in maize due to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais and the larger grain borer Prostephanus truncatus

    Tadele Tefera;Stephen Mugo;Paddy Likhayo

  • Developing Bt maize for resource-poor farmers - Recent advances in the IRMA project

    Stephen Mugo;Hugo De Groote;David Bergvinson;Margaret Mulaa

  • Empirical Comparison of Tropical Maize Hybrids Selected Through Genomic and Phenotypic Selections.

    Yoseph Beyene;Manje Gowda;Michael Olsen;Kelly R Robbins

  • Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping and Molecular Breeding for Developing Stress Resilient Maize for Sub-Saharan Africa

    Kassa Semagn;Yoseph Beyene;Raman Babu;Sudha Nair

  • Quality control genotyping for assessment of genetic identity and purity in diverse tropical maize inbred lines

    Kassa Semagn;Yoseph Beyene;Dan Makumbi;Stephen Mugo

  • ASSESSING THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF BT MAIZE IN KENYA USING A GIS BASED MODEL

    Hugo De Groote;William Overholt;James Okuro Ouma;Stephen Mugo

  • Genetic architecture of maize chlorotic mottle virus and maize lethal necrosis through GWAS, linkage analysis and genomic prediction in tropical maize germplasm

    Chelang’at Sitonik;Chelang’at Sitonik;L. M. Suresh;Yoseph Beyene;Michael S. Olsen

  • Genetic analysis of tropical maize inbred lines for resistance to maize lethal necrosis disease

    Yoseph Beyene;Manje Gowda;L. M. Suresh;Stephen Mugo

  • Genotype by environment interactions and yield stability of stem borer resistant maize hybrids in Kenya

    Yoseph Beyene;Stephen Mugo;Charles Mutinda;Tadele Tefera

  • Combining ability and testcross performance of drought-tolerant maize inbred lines under stress and non-stress environments in Kenya

    Berhanu T. Ertiro;Yoseph Beyene;Biswanath Das;Stephen Mugo

  • On-farm performance and farmers’ participatory assessment of new stress-tolerant maize hybrids in Eastern Africa

    Mosisa Worku;Hugo De Groote;Bernard Munyua;Dan Makumbi

  • Agronomic Performance and Genotype × Environment Interaction of Herbicide-Resistant Maize Varieties in Eastern Africa

    Dan Makumbi;Alpha Diallo;Fred Kanampiu;Stephen Mugo

  • Resistance of three-way cross experimental maize hybrids to post-harvest insect pests, the larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus) and maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais)

    Tadele Tefera;Stephen Mugo;Paddy Likhayo;Yoseph Beyene

  • Genetic distance among doubled haploid maize lines and their testcross performance under drought stress and non-stress conditions

    Yoseph Beyene;Stephen Mugo;Kassa Semagn;Godfrey Asea

  • Mass rearing of stem borers, maize weevil, and larger grain borer insect pests of maize

    T. Tadele;S. Mugo;R. Tende;P. Likhayo

  • Grain yield, stem borer and disease resistance of new maize hybrids in Kenya

    Tadele Tefera;Stephen Mugo;Yoseph Beyene;Haron Karaya

Frequent Co-Authors

Yoseph Beyene
Yoseph Beyene International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Boddupalli M. Prasanna
Boddupalli M. Prasanna International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Kassa Semagn
Kassa Semagn University of Alberta
Manje Gowda
Manje Gowda International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
José Crossa
José Crossa International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Marianne Bänziger
Marianne Bänziger International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Cosmos Magorokosho
Cosmos Magorokosho International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Marilyn L. Warburton
Marilyn L. Warburton United States Department of Agriculture
Raman Babu
Raman Babu Corteva Agriscience
Dan Makumbi
Dan Makumbi International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Stephen Mugo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles