World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
6173
World Ranking
8344
National Ranking
2978

Mark R. Dennett publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Dennett sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 61 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Mark R. Dennett D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Dennett sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark R. Dennett is affiliated with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in the United States. Their professional focus centers on oceanographic research embedded within one of the leading institutions dedicated to the study of marine environments.

Although detailed information on specific research papers, coauthors, fields of study, subfields, main topics, or publication venues is not available, Mark R. Dennett's association with Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution situates their work within an ecosystem known for multidisciplinary oceanographic research. This institution emphasizes studies spanning physical, chemical, biological, and geological oceanography.

The absence of listed recent publications or book contributions limits a detailed overview of their research output. There is no recorded information on awards, which may indicate that such recognitions have either not been received or not documented in this profile.

Mark R. Dennett's scientific profile represents a professional engaged in ongoing work at a major oceanographic research center, likely contributing to the broader scientific understanding of marine systems through individual research, collaboration, or institutional efforts.

Best Publications

  • Regulation of gross growth efficiency and ammonium regeneration in bacteria by substrate C: N ratio1

    Joel C. Goldman;David A. Caron;Mark R. Dennett

  • Microbial food web structure in the Arabian Sea: a US JGOFS study

    David L. Garrison;Marcia M. Gowing;Margaret P. Hughes;Lisa D. Campbell

  • Microzooplankton herbivory in the Ross Sea, Antarctica

    David A Caron;Mark R Dennett;Darcy J Lonsdale;Dawn M Moran

  • Impact of phytoplankton-generated surfactants on air-sea gas exchange

    Nelson M. Frew;Joel C. Goldman;Mark R. Dennett;A. Sherwood Johnson

  • Defining DNA-based operational taxonomic units for microbial-eukaryote ecology.

    David A. Caron;Peter D. Countway;Pratik Savai;Rebecca J. Gast

  • Susceptibility of some marine phytoplankton species to cell breakage during filtration and post-filtration rinsing

    Joel C. Goldman;Mark R. Dennett

  • Characterization of Protistan Assemblages in the Ross Sea, Antarctica, by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis†

    Rebecca J. Gast;Mark R. Dennett;David A. Caron

  • Experimental demonstration of the roles of bacteria and bacterivorous protozoa in plankton nutrient cycles

    David A. Caron;Joel C. Goldman;Mark R. Dennett

  • Upward transport of oceanic nitrate by migrating diatom mats

    Tracy A. Villareal;Cynthia Pilskaln;Mark Brzezinski;Fredric Lipschultz

  • Kleptoplasty in an Antarctic dinoflagellate: caught in evolutionary transition?

    Rebecca J. Gast;Dawn M. Moran;Mark R. Dennett;David A. Caron

  • Picoplankton and nanoplankton and their trophic coupling in surface waters of the Sargasso Sea south of Bermuda

    David A. Caron;Emily R. Peele;Ee Lin Lim;Mark R. Dennett

  • Distinct protistan assemblages characterize the euphotic zone and deep sea (2500 m) of the western North Atlantic (Sargasso Sea and Gulf Stream).

    Peter D. Countway;Rebecca J. Gast;Mark R. Dennett;Pratik Savai

  • The effect of pH in intensive microalgal cultures. I. Biomass regulation

    Joel C. Goldman;Yossef Azov;Carol B. Riley;Mark R. Dennett

  • Responses of bacterioplankton and phytoplankton to organic carbon and inorganic nutrient additions in contrasting oceanic ecosystems

    David A. Caron;Ee Lin Lim;Robert W. Sanders;Mark R. Dennett

  • Isotopic fractionation of oxygen by respiring marine organisms

    John Kiddon;Michael L. Bender;Joe Orchardo;David A. Caron

  • Victims or vectors: a survey of marine vertebrate zoonoses from coastal waters of the Northwest Atlantic.

    Andrea L. Bogomolni;Rebecca J. Gast;Julie C. Ellis;Mark R. Dennett

  • Growth of marine bacteria in batch and continuous culture under carbon and nitrogen limitation

    Joel C. Goldman;Mark R. Dennett

  • The ecology of Paraphysomonas imperforata based on studies employing oligonucleotide probe identification in coastal water samples and enrichment cultures

    Ee Lin Lim;Mark R. Dennett;David A. Caron

  • Surfactant effects on air-sea gas exchange under turbulent conditions

    Joel C. Goldman;Mark R. Dennett;Nelson M. Frew

  • Effect of Temperature on Growth, Respiration, and Nutrient Regeneration by an Omnivorous Microflagellate

    David A. Caron;Joel C. Goldman;Mark R. Dennett

  • The temporal dynamics of the flagellated and colonial stages of Phaeocystis antarctica in the Ross Sea

    Walker O Smith;Mark R Dennett;Sylvie Mathot;David A Caron

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Caron
David A. Caron University of Southern California
Joel C. Goldman
Joel C. Goldman University of California, Santa Cruz
Patricia M. Glibert
Patricia M. Glibert University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Tracy A. Villareal
Tracy A. Villareal The University of Texas at Austin
Robert W. Sanders
Robert W. Sanders Temple University
Walker O. Smith
Walker O. Smith Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Linda A. Amaral-Zettler
Linda A. Amaral-Zettler University of Amsterdam
Mary A. Voytek
Mary A. Voytek National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Lisa Campbell
Lisa Campbell Texas A&M University
Hongbin Liu
Hongbin Liu Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, several online degree options offer flexible and affordable pathways. An accredited affordable online general studies degree can provide a broad foundation, ideal for students seeking versatility in their career options without a heavy financial burden.

If you’re looking for a less demanding academic load while still earning a meaningful credential, exploring the easiest bachelor degree programs might be beneficial. These programs emphasize manageable coursework, making them accessible for a wide variety of learners.

For those focused on earth sciences, pursuing a geology online degree is a valuable option. It offers specialized knowledge about the Earth’s structure and processes, crucial for careers in environmental consulting, conservation, or resource management.

Another rapidly growing field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Many students are turning to the best GIS graduate programs to gain expertise in spatial data analysis and mapping technologies, skills that are increasingly important in environmental planning and policy development.

Best Scientists Citing Mark R. Dennett

Recently Published Articles