World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
30
Citations
4125
World Ranking
2991
National Ranking
483

Mark Learmonth publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Learmonth sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 116 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Mark Learmonth D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Learmonth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity.

    Jean-Pascal Gond;Laure Cabantous;Nancy Harding;Mark Learmonth

  • Autoethnography and academic identity : glimpsing business school doppelgangers.

    Mark Learmonth;Michael Humphreys

  • Leadership as Identity: Constructions and Deconstructions

    Jackie Ford;Mark Learmonth;Nancy Harding

  • Critical Essay: Reconsidering critical performativity

    Laure Cabantous;Jean Pascal Gond;Nancy Harding;Mark Learmonth

  • EVIDENCE‐BASED MANAGEMENT: THE VERY IDEA

    Mark Learmonth;Nancy Harding

  • A critical account of the rise and spread of 'leadership': the case of UK healthcare

    Graham P. Martin;Mark Learmonth

  • Leadership and charisma: A desire that cannot speak its name?:

    Nancy Harding;Hugh Lee;Jackie Ford;Mark Learmonth

  • Some unintended effects of teamwork in healthcare.

    Rachael Finn;Mark Learmonth;Patrick Reedy

  • Leadership as Identity

    Jackie Ford;Nancy Harding;Mark Learmonth

  • Can critical management studies ever be ‘practical’? A case study in engaged scholarship

    Daniel King;Mark Learmonth

  • Who is it that would make business schools more critical ? critical reflections on critical management studies.

    Jackie Ford;Nancy Harding;Mark Learmonth

  • Doing things with words : the case of 'management' and 'administration'.

    Mark Learmonth

  • Is critical leadership studies ‘critical’?:

    Mark Learmonth;Kevin Morrell

  • Against evidence-based management, for management learning

    Kevin Morrell;Mark Learmonth

  • Queer(y)ing public administration.

    Hugh Lee;Mark Learmonth;Nancy Harding

  • Other Possibilities? The Contribution to Management Education of Alternative Organizations

    Patrick Reedy;Mark Learmonth

  • "Is there such a thing as 'evidence-based management'?" : a commentary on Rousseau’s 2005 presidential address.

    M. Learmonth

  • Promoting scholarship that matters: the uselessness of useful research and the usefulness of useless research.

    Mark Learmonth;Andy Lockett;Kevin Dowd

  • Critical Management Education in Action: Personal Tales of Management Unlearning.

    Mark Learmonth

  • Making health services management research critical : a review and a suggestion.

    Mark Learmonth

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy Harding
Nancy Harding University of Bath
Daniel King
Daniel King Flinders University
Jean-Pascal Gond
Jean-Pascal Gond City, University of London
Denise M. Rousseau
Denise M. Rousseau Carnegie Mellon University
Mario Fernando
Mario Fernando University of Wollongong
Graham P. Martin
Graham P. Martin University of Cambridge
Loizos Heracleous
Loizos Heracleous University of Warwick
Kevin Dowd
Kevin Dowd Durham University
David Knights
David Knights Lancaster University
Andy Lockett
Andy Lockett University of Warwick

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark Learmonth

Recently Published Articles