World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 66 8602 7936 666 619 190 16874

Mark B. Cannell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark B. Cannell between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark B. Cannell published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2009. 2 of the 200 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2009. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1982 2025

200 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark B. Cannell: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 4
1987 2
1988 0
1989 6
1990 3
1991 4
1992 2
1993 1
1994 4
1995 3
1996 6
1997 5
1998 6
1999 5
2000 2
2001 3
2002 2
2003 7
2004 7
2005 3
2006 8
2007 7
2008 6
2009 14
2010 11
2011 9
2012 10
2013 9
2014 5
2015 6
2016 4
2017 6
2018 10
2019 5
2020 5
2021 1
2022 3
2023 1
2024 1
2025 1
Total 200
Download as CSV

Mark B. Cannell publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark B. Cannell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–196 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 190 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787 190
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark B. Cannell D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark B. Cannell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897 66
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark B. Cannell is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with specialized work in cardiology and cardiovascular medicine as well as molecular biology. Their studies often address subfields including cellular and molecular neuroscience, spectroscopy, and electrical and electronic engineering.

Cannell's main topics of research cover cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, ion channel regulation and function, neuroscience and neural engineering, ECG monitoring and analysis, mass spectrometry techniques and applications, cardiac arrhythmias and treatments, and electrostatic discharge in electronics.

The scientist has contributed to a number of publications, frequently collaborating with coauthors such as Ewan D. Fowler, Jules C. Hancox, Nan Wang, Ana M. Gómez, and Jolanda van der Velden.

Their notable recent papers include:

  • Arrhythmogenic late Ca 2+ sparks in failing heart cells and their control by action potential configuration, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Nano-scale morphology of cardiomyocyte t-tubule/sarcoplasmic reticulum junctions revealed by ultra-rapid high-pressure freezing and electron tomography, 2020, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
  • Inducing Ito,f and phase 1 repolarization of the cardiac action potential with a Kv4.3/KChIP2.1 bicistronic transgene, 2021, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
  • Improved Ca2+ release synchrony following selective modification of Itof and phase 1 repolarization in normal and failing ventricular myocytes, 2022, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
  • Compromised repolarization reserve in a murine model of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia caused by RyR2-R420Q mutation, 2025, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology

Cannell's publications are frequently found in venues such as the Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Biophysical Journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Cells.

Best Publications

  • Calcium sparks: elementary events underlying excitation-contraction coupling in heart muscle

    H Cheng;W J Lederer;Mark B Cannell

  • Der p 1 facilitates transepithelial allergen delivery by disruption of tight junctions

    Hong Wan;Helen L. Winton;Christian Soeller;Euan R. Tovey

  • Defective excitation-contraction coupling in experimental cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure.

    A. M. Gómez;H. H. Valdivia;H. Cheng;Miriam R. Lederer

  • The control of calcium release in heart muscle

    Mark B Cannell;Hongwei Cheng;W J Lederer

  • Calcium sparks and [Ca2+]i waves in cardiac myocytes

    H. Cheng;M. R. Lederer;W. J. Lederer;M. B. Cannell

  • Effect of membrane potential changes on the calcium transient in single rat cardiac muscle cells

    Mark B. Cannell;Joshua R. Berlin;William J. Lederer

  • Spatial non-uniformities in [Ca2+]i during excitation-contraction coupling in cardiac myocytes

    M.B. Cannell;H. Cheng;W.J. Lederer

  • Cellular and subcellular heterogeneity of [Ca2+]i in single heart cells revealed by fura-2

    W. G. Wier;M. B. Cannell;J. R Berlin;E. Marban

  • Examination of the Transverse Tubular System in Living Cardiac Rat Myocytes by 2-Photon Microscopy and Digital Image–Processing Techniques

    C. Soeller;M. B. Cannell

  • The transmembrane protein occludin of epithelial tight junctions is a functional target for serine peptidases from faecal pellets of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus.

    H. Wan;H. L. Winton;C. Soeller;G. W. Taylor

  • Optical single-channel resolution imaging of the ryanodine receptor distribution in rat cardiac myocytes.

    David Baddeley;Isuru D. Jayasinghe;Leo Lam;Sabrina Rossberger

  • Relation Between the Sarcolemmal Ca2+ Current and Ca2+ Sparks and Local Control Theories for Cardiac Excitation-Contraction Coupling

    Luis Fernando Santana;H. Cheng;A. M. Gómez;M. B. Cannell

  • Cellular origins of the transient inward current in cardiac myocytes. Role of fluctuations and waves of elevated intracellular calcium.

    Joshua Berlin;M. B. Cannell;W. J. Lederer

  • Model of calcium movements during activation in the sarcomere of frog skeletal muscle

    M.B. Cannell;D.G. Allen

  • Kinetics, stoichiometry and role of the Na–Ca exchange mechanism in isolated cardiac myocytes

    Lynn M. Crespo;Christopher J. Grantham;Mark B. Cannell

  • Quantitative structural and biochemical analyses of tight junction dynamics following exposure of epithelial cells to house dust mite allergen Der p 1.

    H. Wan;H.L. Winton;C. Soeller;D.C. Gruenert

  • Expression of the P2X(2) receptor subunit of the ATP-gated ion channel in the cochlea: implications for sound transduction and auditory neurotransmission.

    Gary D. Housley;Refik Kanjhan;Nicholas P. Raybould;Denise Greenwood

  • NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF LOCAL CALCIUM MOVEMENTS DURING L-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNEL GATING IN THE CARDIAC DIAD

    C. Soeller;M.B. Cannell

  • Tight junction properties of the immortalized human bronchial epithelial cell lines Calu-3 and 16HBE14o-

    H. Wan;H.L. Winton;C. Soeller;Geoffrey Stewart

  • Three-Dimensional Distribution of Ryanodine Receptor Clusters in Cardiac Myocytes

    Ye Chen-Izu;Stacey L. McCulle;Chris W. Ward;Christian Soeller

Frequent Co-Authors

W. J. Lederer
W. J. Lederer University of Maryland, Baltimore
Heping Cheng
Heping Cheng Peking University
David R. Garrod
David R. Garrod University of Manchester
Philip J. Thompson
Philip J. Thompson University of Western Australia
Garth J. S. Cooper
Garth J. S. Cooper University of Auckland
David G. Allen
David G. Allen University of Sydney
Jadranka Travas-Sejdic
Jadranka Travas-Sejdic University of Auckland
Donald M. Bers
Donald M. Bers University of California, Davis
Gary D. Housley
Gary D. Housley University of New South Wales
Hui Peng
Hui Peng East China Normal University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Biology and Biochemistry, exploring related healthcare and science career paths can open many opportunities. Advances in online education now allow you to pursue essential programs remotely with a flexible schedule.

If you are eager to launch your medical career quickly, consider online medical assistant programs that accept financial aid. These programs are an accessible first step and can help you gain practical skills and certification in less than a year.

Those looking to advance further may be interested in cma to lpn bridge programs online. These bridge paths are designed for certified medical assistants aiming to become Licensed Practical Nurses, expanding your clinical responsibilities and earning potential.

For a broader science focus, you may want to explore a biology degree online. These accelerated programs can be completed faster than traditional options, preparing you for lab work, research, or graduate school.

Finally, those with a passion for nursing should look into asn online nursing programs. These associate degrees are a direct route to becoming a registered nurse and starting a rewarding healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Mark B. Cannell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles