World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Margaret T. Fuller

Margaret T. Fuller

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
65
Citations
21482
World Ranking
1649
National Ranking
835

Margaret T. Fuller publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret T. Fuller sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 139 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Margaret T. Fuller D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret T. Fuller sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Margaret T. Fuller is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily falls under the broader field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Insect Science, Aging, and Cell Biology as key subfields.

Their work covers several major topics including:

  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Cancer-related gene regulation
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Margaret T. Fuller include:

  • Lorenzo Gallicchio (13 publications)
  • Cameron W. Berry (8 publications)
  • Neuza R. Matias (7 publications)
  • Sarah R. Stern (6 publications)
  • Catherine C. Baker (5 publications)

Their research has been published extensively in several venues, with notable frequency in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) - 13 publications
  • Genes & Development - 6 publications
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - 2 publications
  • Science - 1 publication
  • eLife - 1 publication

Selected recent papers by Margaret T. Fuller reflect active engagement in single-cell and transcriptomic analyses, including:

  • "Fly Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly," 2022, Science
  • "Fly Cell Atlas: a single-cell transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly," 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Emergent dynamics of adult stem cell lineages from single nucleus and single cell RNA-Seq of Drosophila testes," 2023, eLife
  • "Developmental regulation of cell type-specific transcription by novel promoter-proximal sequence elements," 2020, Genes & Development
  • "Adversarial domain translation networks for integrating large-scale atlas-level single-cell datasets," 2022, Nature Computational Science

Best Publications

  • Control of mitochondrial morphology by a human mitofusin

    Ansgar Santel;Margaret T. Fuller

  • Stem Cells and Cancer: Two Faces of Eve

    Michael F. Clarke;Margaret Fuller

  • Monoclonal antibodies specific for an acetylated form of alpha-tubulin recognize the antigen in cilia and flagella from a variety of organisms.

    Gianni Piperno;Margaret T. Fuller

  • Spatial and temporal association of Bax with mitochondrial fission sites, Drp1, and Mfn2 during apoptosis

    Mariusz Karbowski;Yang-Ja Lee;Brigitte Gaume;Seon-Yong Jeong

  • Stem cell self-renewal specified by JAK-STAT activation in response to a support cell cue.

    Amy A. Kiger;D. Leanne Jones;Cordula Schulz;Madolyn B. Rogers

  • Orientation of Asymmetric Stem Cell Division by the APC Tumor Suppressor and Centrosome

    Yukiko M. Yamashita;D. Leanne Jones;Margaret T. Fuller

  • Developmentally Regulated Mitochondrial Fusion Mediated by a Conserved, Novel, Predicted GTPase

    Karen G Hales;Margaret T Fuller

  • Mitochondrial fusion in yeast requires the transmembrane GTPase Fzo1p

    Greg J. Hermann;John W. Thatcher;John P. Mills;Karen G. Hales

  • Male and female Drosophila germline stem cells: two versions of immortality.

    Margaret T. Fuller;Allan C. Spradling

  • Asymmetric Inheritance of Mother Versus Daughter Centrosome in Stem Cell Division

    Yukiko M. Yamashita;Anthony P. Mahowald;Julie R. Perlin;Margaret T. Fuller

  • Somatic support cells restrict germline stem cell self-renewal and promote differentiation

    Amy A. Kiger;Helen White-Cooper;Margaret T. Fuller

  • Mitofusin-1 protein is a generally expressed mediator of mitochondrial fusion in mammalian cells

    Ansgar Santel;Stephan Frank;Stephan Frank;Brigitte Gaume;Michael Herrler

  • Centrosome misorientation reduces stem cell division during ageing

    Jun Cheng;Nezaket Türkel;Nahid Hemati;Margaret T. Fuller

  • Assembly of ring canals in the male germ line from structural components of the contractile ring

    Gary R. Hime;Julie A. Brill;Margaret T. Fuller

  • Germline Stem Cells

    Allan Spradling;Margaret T. Fuller;Robert E. Braun;Shosei Yoshida

  • Genetic control of cell proliferation and differentiation in Drosophila spermatogenesis.

    Margaret T. Fuller

  • Developmental regulation of transcription by a tissue-specific TAF homolog

    Mark A. Hiller;Ting-Yi Lin;Cricket Wood;Margaret T. Fuller

  • Signaling from germ cells mediated by the rhomboid homolog stet organizes encapsulation by somatic support cells

    Cordula Schulz;Cricket G. Wood;Cricket G. Wood;D. Leanne Jones;Salli I. Tazuke

  • Moesin and its activating kinase Slik are required for cortical stability and microtubule organization in mitotic cells

    Sébastien Carreno;Ilektra Kouranti;Edith Szafer Glusman;Margaret T. Fuller

  • Some Consequences of Having Too Little

    A. T. Annunziato;R. K. Schindler;M. G. Riggs;R. L. Seale

Frequent Co-Authors

Maurizio Gatti
Maurizio Gatti Sapienza University of Rome
George J. Thomas
George J. Thomas University of Missouri–Kansas City
Anthony P. Mahowald
Anthony P. Mahowald University of Chicago
Mary E. Porter
Mary E. Porter University of Minnesota
Dirk G. de Rooij
Dirk G. de Rooij Utrecht University
Lorenzo A. Pinna
Lorenzo A. Pinna University of Padua
Gary G. Borisy
Gary G. Borisy ADA Forsyth Institute
Allan C. Spradling
Allan C. Spradling Carnegie Institution for Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Molecular Biology but wish to explore related healthcare fields, several online degrees are worth considering. For those drawn to communication disorders, asha online slp programs provide a flexible route to becoming a Speech-Language Pathologist. These programs are designed to meet accreditation standards and can fast-track your entry into this rewarding field.

Alternatively, if your undergraduate background isn’t in Communication Sciences, transition to SLP master’s for non-CSD majors is possible through online bridge programs. These pathways let you pivot from Molecular Biology to Speech-Language Pathology without starting from scratch.

For those interested in nursing, accelerated bsn programs for non nurses offer an intensive online option to quickly earn your degree and enter the healthcare workforce.

Looking ahead to career outcomes, psychiatric care is a high-demand specialty. Learn more about opportunities and compensation by exploring psychiatric np salary trends by state.

Best Scientists Citing Margaret T. Fuller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles