World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 89 12470 11731 6387 5906 339 40680

Marc Moss publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marc Moss between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marc Moss published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 10.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2011. 7 of the 342 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2011. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
1993 2025

342 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marc Moss: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 2
1995 3
1996 3
1997 2
1998 1
1999 3
2000 3
2001 4
2002 3
2003 9
2004 2
2005 7
2006 12
2007 11
2008 14
2009 19
2010 17
2011 26
2012 26
2013 19
2014 16
2015 11
2016 21
2017 15
2018 18
2019 16
2020 20
2021 18
2022 6
2023 6
2024 3
2025 4
Total 342
Download as CSV

Marc Moss publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Moss sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 339 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 339
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Marc Moss D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Moss sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 89
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marc Moss is affiliated with the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of medicine, health professions, and psychology, with 37, 26, and 17 publications in each area respectively.

Their work delves into several subfields including general health professions, clinical psychology, critical care and intensive care medicine, public health, environmental and occupational health, and radiological and ultrasound technology. These areas reflect a broad interdisciplinary approach within healthcare and critical care environments.

Marc Moss's research topics cover a range of issues centered on healthcare professionals and patient care in intensive care units. Specific topics include:

  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Intensive Care Unit cognitive disorders
  • Family and patient care in intensive care units
  • Palliative care and end-of-life issues
  • Music therapy and health
  • COVID-19 and mental health
  • Art therapy and mental health

The scientist has published in several key venues within their field with multiple contributions, including:

  • Annals of the American Thoracic Society (4 publications)
  • CHEST Journal (4 publications)
  • Critical Care Medicine (3 publications)
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (2 publications)
  • American Journal of Critical Care (2 publications)

Marc Moss has worked collaboratively with several frequent co-authors, maintaining research partnerships with:

  • Michelle N. Gong (6 co-authored works)
  • Samuel M. Brown (6 co-authored works)
  • Karen E. A. Burns (4 co-authored works)
  • Margaret S. Herridge (4 co-authored works)
  • Catherine L. Hough (4 co-authored works)

Notable recent papers associated with this researcher are:

  • "ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies," published in 2023 in Intensive Care Medicine
  • "A New Global Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome," published in 2023 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • "COVID-19: a heavy toll on health-care workers," published in 2021 in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • "Effect of Vitamin C, Thiamine, and Hydrocortisone on Ventilator- and Vasopressor-Free Days in Patients With Sepsis," published in 2021 in JAMA
  • "The Critical Nature of Addressing Burnout Prevention: Results From the Critical Care Societies Collaborative's National Summit and Survey on Prevention and Management of Burnout in the ICU," published in 2020 in Critical Care Medicine

Best Publications

  • The Epidemiology of Sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000

    Greg S. Martin;David M. Mannino;Stephanie Eaton;Marc Moss

  • The effect of age on the development and outcome of adult sepsis.

    Greg S. Martin;David M. Mannino;Marc Moss

  • An Official Critical Care Societies Collaborative Statement—Burnout Syndrome in Critical Care Health-care Professionals: A Call for Action

    Marc Moss;Vicki S. Good;David Gozal;Ruth Kleinpell

  • Postoperative delirium in the elderly: risk factors and outcomes.

    Thomas N. Robinson;Christopher D. Raeburn;Zung V. Tran;Erik M. Angles

  • The presence of resilience is associated with a healthier psychological profile in intensive care unit (ICU) nurses: results of a national survey.

    Meredith Mealer;Jacqueline Jones;Julia Newman;Kim K. McFann

  • Redefining geriatric preoperative assessment using frailty, disability and co-morbidity.

    Thomas N. Robinson;Ben Eiseman;Jeffrey I. Wallace;Skotti D. Church

  • Simple frailty score predicts postoperative complications across surgical specialties.

    Thomas N. Robinson;Daniel S. Wu;Lauren Pointer;Christina L. Dunn

  • An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: The Diagnosis of Intensive Care Unit–acquired Weakness in Adults

    Eddy Fan;Fern Cheek;Linda Chlan;Rik Gosselink

  • The prevalence and impact of post traumatic stress disorder and burnout syndrome in nurses

    Meredith Mealer;Ellen L. Burnham;Colleen J. Goode;Barbara Rothbaum

  • Increased Prevalence of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms in Critical Care Nurses

    Meredith L. Mealer;April Shelton;Britt Berg;Barbara Rothbaum

  • The Role of Chronic Alcohol Abuse in the Development of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Adults

    Marc Moss;Becki Bucher;Frederick A. Moore;Ernest E. Moore

  • The role of infection and comorbidity: Factors that influence disparities in sepsis.

    Annette M. Esper;Marc Moss;Charmaine A. Lewis;Rachel Nisbet

  • Accumulated Frailty Characteristics Predict Postoperative Discharge Institutionalization in the Geriatric Patient

    Thomas N. Robinson;Jeffrey I. Wallace;Daniel S. Wu;Arek Wiktor

  • Recovery and outcomes after the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients and their family caregivers

    Margaret S. Herridge;Marc Moss;Catherine L. Hough;Ramona O. Hopkins;Ramona O. Hopkins;Ramona O. Hopkins

  • A randomized, controlled trial of furosemide with or without albumin in hypoproteinemic patients with acute lung injury*

    Greg S. Martin;Marc Moss;Arthur P. Wheeler;Meredith Mealer

  • Effect of Hydroxychloroquine on Clinical Status at 14 Days in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Wesley H. Self;Matthew W. Semler;Lindsay M. Leither;Lindsay M. Leither;Jonathan D. Casey

  • Cirrhosis as a Risk Factor for Sepsis and Death: Analysis of the National Hospital Discharge Survey

    Marilyn G. Foreman;David M. Mannino;Marc Moss

  • The Epidemiology of Sepsis in Patients With Malignancy

    Pajman A. Danai;Marc Moss;David M. Mannino;Greg S. Martin

  • Extravascular lung water in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective cohort study.

    Greg S Martin;Stephanie Eaton;Meredith Mealer;Marc Moss

  • A Randomized Trial of an Intensive Physical Therapy Program for Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure

    Marc Moss;Amy Nordon-Craft;Daniel C Malone;David Van Pelt

Frequent Co-Authors

Ivor S. Douglas
Ivor S. Douglas University of Colorado Denver
Roy G. Brower
Roy G. Brower Johns Hopkins University
Theodore J. Standiford
Theodore J. Standiford University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas N. Robinson
Thomas N. Robinson University of Colorado Denver
B. Taylor Thompson
B. Taylor Thompson Harvard University
Theodore J. Iwashyna
Theodore J. Iwashyna University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David Gozal
David Gozal Marshall University
Lou Ann S. Brown
Lou Ann S. Brown Emory University
Todd W. Rice
Todd W. Rice Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Ramona O. Hopkins
Ramona O. Hopkins Brigham Young University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn't always require a traditional path. There are numerous dnp programs online that allow you to advance your nursing qualifications and specialize without putting your life on hold. If you're looking to enter the healthcare field quickly, you may want to consider what is the fastest way to become an lpn, as fast-track online LPN programs can help you start working sooner.

Mental health is a growing field, and online pmhnp programs offer flexible, accredited routes for RNs seeking advanced practice in psychiatric nursing. Beyond clinical care, those interested in healthcare leadership can benefit from a health care administration degree online, which opens doors to management roles in various healthcare settings.

Whether you want to provide direct patient care or lead from behind the scenes, online degrees offer accessible and affordable routes to achieving your goals in the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Moss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles