World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
79
Citations
18845
World Ranking
4393
National Ranking
325

Lutz Edler publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lutz Edler sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 309 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Lutz Edler D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lutz Edler sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lutz Edler is affiliated with the German Cancer Research Center in Germany. The scientist's research work spans several fields and topics related to health and environmental sciences, with a particular focus on cancer and related biomedical studies.

Edler's recent papers demonstrate engagement with both applied and editorial aspects of scientific research. Notable publications include:

  • "Guidance on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment" (2022), published in EFSA Journal
  • "Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal 7'21" (2021), published in Biometrical Journal
  • "Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal 8'21" (2021), published in Biometrical Journal
  • "Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal 3'21" (2021), published in Biometrical Journal
  • "Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal 2'22" (2022), published in Biometrical Journal

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Biometrical Journal
  • EFSA Journal

The scientist regularly collaborates with a consistent group of coauthors, including:

  • Arne C. Bathke
  • Matthias Schmid
  • Antonello Maruotti
  • Marco Alfò
  • Andriy I. Bandos

Edler's work covers various subfields of study, such as:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Cancer Research
  • General Health Professions
  • Immunology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Main research topics include:

  • Radioactive contamination and transfer
  • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Health and Conflict Studies
  • Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

The scientist's publication record indicates an integration of statistical and biometrical expertise within biomedical research contexts, reinforcing contributions to risk assessment strategies and expert editorial roles in biometrical research publications.

Best Publications

  • Dacarbazine (DTIC) versus vaccination with autologous peptide-pulsed dendritic cells (DC) in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: a randomized phase III trial of the DC study group of the DeCOG

    D. Schadendorf;S. Ugurel;B. Schuler-Thurner;F.O. Nestle

  • Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and perfluorooctanoic acid in food

    Helle Katrine Knutsen;Jan Alexander;Lars Barregård;Margherita Bignami

  • Risks to human and animal health related to the presence of deoxynivalenol and its acetylated and modified forms in food and feed

    Helle Katrine Knutsen;Jan Alexander;Lars Barregård;Margherita Bignami

  • Scientific Opinion on Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in food and feed

    T. Beuerle;D. Benford;L. Brimer;B. Cottrill

  • L1 expression as a predictor of progression and survival in patients with uterine and ovarian carcinomas.

    Mina Fogel;Paul Gutwein;Sabine Mechtersheimer;Svenja Riedle

  • Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment

    Anthony Hardy;Diane Benford;Thorhallur Halldorsson;Michael John Jeger

  • Efficacy of Fractionated Stereotactic Reirradiation in Recurrent Gliomas: Long-Term Results in 172 Patients Treated in a Single Institution

    Stephanie E. Combs;Christoph Thilmann;Lutz Edler;Jürgen Debus

  • Effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy in the treatment of skull-base chordomas

    Daniela Schulz-Ertner;Christian P. Karger;Alexandra Feuerhake;Anna Nikoghosyan

  • ToxRTool, a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data

    Klaus Schneider;Markus Schwarz;Iris Burkholder;Annette Kopp-Schneider

  • Risk for animal and human health related to the presence of dioxins and dioxin???like PCBs in feed and food

    Helle Katrine Knutsen;Jan Alexander;Lars Barregård

  • Scientific Opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat (swine)

    Olivier Andreoletti;Herbert Budka;Sava Buncic;John D Collins

  • Scientific Opinion on the risks for public and animal health related to the presence of citrinin in food and feed

    Josef Böhm;Sarah De Saeger;Lutz Edler;Johanna Fink-Gremmels

  • Angiopoietin-2 Levels Are Associated with Disease Progression in Metastatic Malignant Melanoma

    Iris Helfrich;Lutz Edler;Antje Sucker;Markus Thomas;Markus Thomas

  • Phase II Clinical Trial of Titanocene Dichloride in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

    N. Kröger;U.R. Kleeberg;K. Mross;L Edler

  • Specific combinations of DNA repair gene variants and increased risk for non-small cell lung cancer

    Odilia Popanda;Torsten Schattenberg;Chi Tai Phong;Dorota Butkiewicz

  • Neutralization of CD95 ligand promotes regeneration and functional recovery after spinal cord injury

    Deana Demjen;Stefan Klussmann;Susanne Kleber;Cecilia Zuliani

  • Risks for human health related to the presence of 3- and 2-monochloropropanediol (MCPD), and their fatty acid esters, and glycidyl fatty acid esters in food

    Heather Wallace;Alexander Jan;Lars Barregård;Margherita Bignami

  • Carbon ion radiotherapy of skull base chondrosarcomas

    Daniela Schulz-Ertner;Anna Nikoghosyan;Holger Hof;Bernd Didinger

  • Risk characterisation of chemicals in food and diet.

    A. G. Renwick;S. M. Barlow;Irva Hertz-Picciotto;A. R. Boobis

  • Appropriateness to set a group health based guidance value for nivalenol and its modified forms

    Helle Katrine Knutsen;Lars Barregård;Margherita Bignami

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra Ceccatelli
Sandra Ceccatelli Karolinska Institute
Margherita Bignami
Margherita Bignami Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Christer Hogstrand
Christer Hogstrand King's College London
Bettina Grasl-Kraupp
Bettina Grasl-Kraupp Medical University of Vienna
Angela Risch
Angela Risch University of Salzburg
Isabelle P. Oswald
Isabelle P. Oswald Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Jan Alexander
Jan Alexander Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Helmut Bartsch
Helmut Bartsch German Cancer Research Center
Manfred Metzler
Manfred Metzler Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Stephanie E. Combs
Stephanie E. Combs Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students with a background in Biology and Biochemistry have a range of in-demand career options in healthcare administration and information management. Popular pathways include medical billing and coding, health information management, and clinical data analysis.

For those interested in coding and classifying medical data, it’s important to understand the key differences between ccs vs cpc certification. Each credential can greatly impact your job opportunities, earning potential, and areas of specialization.

Online programs make it accessible for students to earn a health information management degree online. These degrees often lead to roles such as medical records managers or compliance officers.

Interested in medical coding? Learn more about medical coding jobs salary projections, job requirements, and long-term advancement.

As the demand for healthcare professionals grows, many are asking: is medical billing and coding in demand? Industry trends indicate strong job stability and continuing need for trained specialists.

Best Scientists Citing Lutz Edler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles