World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
32521
World Ranking
14921
National Ranking
7543

McClellan M. Walther publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where McClellan M. Walther sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 212 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

McClellan M. Walther D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where McClellan M. Walther sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

McClellan M. Walther is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States, contributing to research in their capacity at this prominent institution. Their professional profile is characterized by an absence of publicly listed recent papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues, indicating either emerging activity in the research community or a focus on unpublished or internal research efforts.

The scientist does not have recorded book publications or specified main and subfields of study available in the accessible data. Similarly, no specific main topics of work have been documented, nor are there awards or honors recorded in the provided information.

Given the available data, it appears the scientist's contributions are either situated within areas not publicly indexed or the data has not been fully disclosed. The lack of detailed publication or collaboration records suggests a profile centered on ongoing or early-stage research activities.

Best Publications

  • Mutations of the VHL tumour suppressor gene in renal carcinoma

    J.R. Gnarra;K. Tory;Y. Weng;L. Schmidt

  • Germline and Somatic Mutations in the Tyrosine Kinase Domain of the MET Proto-Oncogene in Papillary Renal Carcinomas

    L. Schmidt;F.-M. Duh;F. Chen;T. Kishida

  • von Hippel-Lindau disease

    Russell R Lonser;Gladys M Glenn;McClellan Walther;Emily Y Chew

  • Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best?

    Jacques W. M. Lenders;Karel Pacak;McClellan M. Walther;W. Marston Linehan

  • Mutations in a novel gene lead to kidney tumors, lung wall defects, and benign tumors of the hair follicle in patients with the Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome.

    Michael L. Nickerson;Michelle B. Warren;Jorge R. Toro;Vera Matrosova

  • Recent advances in genetics, diagnosis, localization, and treatment of pheochromocytoma.

    Karel Pacak;W. Marston Linehan;Graeme Eisenhofer;McClellan M. Walther

  • Mutations in the fumarate hydratase gene cause hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer in families in North America.

    Jorge R. Toro;Michael L. Nickerson;Ming Hui Wei;Michelle B. Warren

  • Renal Tumors in the Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome

    Christian P. Pavlovich;McClellan M. Walther;Robin A. Eyler;Stephen M. Hewitt

  • The Genetic Basis of Cancer of the Kidney

    W. Marston Linehan;McCLELLAN M. Walther;Berton Zbar

  • von Hippel-Lindau disease: genetic, clinical, and imaging features.

    P L Choyke;G M Glenn;M M Walther;N J Patronas

  • Improved detection of germline mutations in the von Hippel‐Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene

    Catherine Stolle;Gladys Glenn;Berton Zbar;Jeffrey S. Humphrey

  • Biochemical Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma: How to Distinguish True- from False-Positive Test Results

    Graeme Eisenhofer;David S. Goldstein;McClellan M. Walther;Peter Friberg

  • Risk of Renal and Colonic Neoplasms and Spontaneous Pneumothorax in the Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome

    Berton Zbar;W. Gregory Alvord;Gladys Glenn;Maria Turner

  • Germline BHD-mutation spectrum and phenotype analysis of a large cohort of families with Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome.

    Laura S. Schmidt;Michael L. Nickerson;Michelle B. Warren;Gladys M. Glenn

  • von Recklinghausen's disease and pheochromocytomas.

    McClellan M. Walther;Judi Herring;Erik Enquist;Harry R. Keiser

  • PERCUTANEOUS RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION OF SMALL RENAL TUMORS: INITIAL RESULTS

    Christian P. Pavlovich;McCLELLAN M. Walther;Peter L. Choyke;Stephen E. Pautler

  • Plasma normetanephrine and metanephrine for detecting pheochromocytoma in von Hippel-Lindau disease and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2.

    G. Eisenhofer;J. W. M. Lenders;W. M. Linehan;M. M. Walther

  • Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation.

    C A Jamis-Dow;P L Choyke;S B Jennings;W M Linehan

  • Hereditary Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma

    Berton Zbar;Kalman Tory;Maria Merino;Laura Schmidt

  • Genetic Basis of Cancer of the Kidney: Disease-Specific Approaches to Therapy

    W. Marston Linehan;James Vasselli;Ramaprasad Srinivasan;McClellan M. Walther

Frequent Co-Authors

W. Marston Linehan
W. Marston Linehan National Institutes of Health
Peter L. Choyke
Peter L. Choyke National Institutes of Health
Berton Zbar
Berton Zbar National Institutes of Health
David Venzon
David Venzon National Institutes of Health
Maria J. Merino
Maria J. Merino National Institutes of Health
Karel Pacak
Karel Pacak National Institutes of Health
Laura S. Schmidt
Laura S. Schmidt National Institutes of Health
Harry R. Keiser
Harry R. Keiser National Institutes of Health
Steven K. Libutti
Steven K. Libutti Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a career in medicine but want more flexibility or faster pathways, a range of online healthcare degrees are available. For those seeking career advancement in nursing, the short DNP programs can help you earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice in less time. These programs are ideal for working professionals looking to move into leadership roles quickly.

Budget is often a major concern, but cheapest online DNP programs offer affordable options without sacrificing quality. This allows aspiring nurse leaders to further their education without incurring excessive student debt.

Interested in entering the nursing field directly? An LPN accelerated program provides a pathway to start working as a Licensed Practical Nurse in as few as 12 months, depending on your chosen course and pace.

For registered nurses aiming to specialize, BSN to NP programs online enable rapid transition into Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner roles. These flexible online options cater to busy professionals who want to enhance their credentials and expand their scope of practice.

Best Scientists Citing McClellan M. Walther

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles