World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Leonore Ganschow

Leonore Ganschow

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
41
Citations
7324
World Ranking
5038
National Ranking
2379

Leonore Ganschow publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonore Ganschow sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 70 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Leonore Ganschow D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonore Ganschow sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leonore Ganschow was affiliated with Miami University in the United States. Their research primarily focused on areas within Arts and Humanities, with significant contributions to the subfields of Language and Linguistics as well as Literature and Literary Theory.

Their work addressed several main topics, including:

  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Linguistic Education and Pedagogy

Throughout their career, Ganschow collaborated frequently with a group of scholars, including:

  • Richard L. Sparks (with whom they co-authored 29 publications combined)
  • Jon Patton (12 publications)
  • Nancy Humbach (8 publications)
  • James Javorsky (5 publications)

While specific details about their recent papers or publication venues are not documented here, the volume and nature of collaborations suggest a consistent engagement with research communities specializing in second language acquisition and education.

Ganschow's focus on EFL/ESL teaching and linguistic pedagogy highlights an interest in developing effective educational strategies for language learning. Their contributions span practical teaching methodologies as well as theoretical inquiries into language acquisition processes.

Best Publications

  • Foreign language learning differences: Affective or native language aptitude differences?

    Richard L. Sparks;Leonore Ganschow

  • Anxiety about Foreign Language Learning among High School Women

    Leonore Ganschow;Richard L. Sparks

  • Searching for the Cognitive Locus of Foreign Language Learning Difficulties: Linking First and Second Language Learning

    Richard Sparks;Leonore Ganschow

  • Differences in Language Performance among High-, Average-, and Low-Anxious College Foreign Language Learners

    Leonore Ganschow;Richard L. Sparks;Reed Anderson;James Javorshy

  • Foreign Language Learning Difficulties An Historical Perspective

    Leonore Ganschow;Richard L. Sparks;James Javorsky

  • The Impact of Native Language Learning Problems on Foreign Language Learning: Case Study Illustrations of the Linguistic Cooling Deficit Hypothesis

    Richard L. Sparks;Leonore Ganschow

  • A Strong Inference Approach to Causal Factors in Foreign Language Learning: A Response to MacIntyre

    Richard L. Sparks;Leonore Ganschow

  • Aptitude for learning a foreign language

    Richard Sparks;Leonore Ganschow

  • Déjà Vu All Over Again: A Response to Saito, Horwitz, and Garza

    Richard L. Sparks;Leonore Ganschow;James Javorsky

  • Long-Term Crosslinguistic Transfer of Skills From L1 to L2

    Richard Sparks;Jon Patton;Leonore Ganschow;Nancy Humbach

  • Early first-language reading and spelling skills predict later second-language reading and spelling skills

    Richard L. Sparks;Jon Patton;Leonore Ganschow;Nancy Humbach

  • Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners.

    Richard Sparks;Leonore Ganschow;Jane Pohlman

  • Native language predictors of foreign language proficiency and foreign language aptitude.

    Richard L Sparks;Jon Patton;Leonore Ganschow;Nancy Humbach

  • Identifying Native Language Difficulties Among Foreign Language Learners in College: A "Foreign" Language Learning Disability?

    Leonore Ganschow;Richard L. Sparks;James Javorsky;Jane Pohlman

  • Effects of Direct Instruction in Spanish Phonology on the Native-Language Skills and Foreign-Language Aptitude of At-Risk Foreign-Language Learners

    Leonore Ganschow;Richard Sparks

  • Is the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale Measuring Anxiety or Language Skills

    Richard L. Sparks;Leonore Ganschow

  • Long-term relationships among early first language skills, second language aptitude, second language affect, and later second language proficiency

    Richard L. Sparks;Jon M. Patton;Leonore Ganschow;Nancy Humbach

  • Test Comparisons among Students Identified as High-Risk, Low-Risk, and Learning Disabled in High School Foreign Language Courses.

    Richard L. Sparks;James Javorsky;Leonore Ganschow;Jane Pohlman

  • Prediction of foreign language proficiency

    Richard L. Sparks;Leonore Ganschow;Jon Patton;Marjorie Artzer

  • Subcomponents of Second-Language Aptitude and Second-Language Proficiency.

    Richard L. Sparks;Nancy Humbach;Jon M. Patton;Leonore Ganschow

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard L. Sparks
Richard L. Sparks Saint Joseph's University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA unlocks a wide range of online degree options tailored for diverse career goals. For those passionate about empowering communities through social work, accelerated online msw programs offer flexible pathways to advanced social work roles in less time.

Psychology remains a popular choice, and earning an accelerated bachelor's degree in psychology can quickly put you on track for careers in counseling, human resources, research, and more.

Those interested in therapy and counseling should look for accredited programs. Attending cacrep schools ensures your degree in counseling meets the highest industry standards, which can enhance your employability and readiness for licensure.

For careers focused on families and relationships, accredited mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) provide affordable, quality training for a rewarding profession.

With these online degrees, you can start or advance your career in social sciences and humanities with the confidence of a flexible and reputable education.

Best Scientists Citing Leonore Ganschow

Recently Published Articles