World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira Peres

Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira Peres

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
48
Citations
7037
World Ranking
2451
National Ranking
40

Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira Peres publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira Peres sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 150 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira Peres D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira Peres sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • De novo domestication of wild tomato using genome editing

    Agustin Zsögön;Tomáš Čermák;Emmanuel Rezende Naves;Marcela Morato Notini

  • Acquired tolerance of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Micro‐Tom) plants to cadmium‐induced stress

    P.L. Gratão;C.C. Monteiro;A.M. Antunes;L.E.P. Peres

  • Bioactivity of Chemically Transformed Humic Matter from Vermicompost on Plant Root Growth

    Leonardo Barros Dobbss;Luciano Pasqualoto Canellas;Fábio Lopes Olivares;Natália Oliveira Aguiar

  • microRNA156-targeted SPL/SBP box transcription factors regulate tomato ovary and fruit development

    Geraldo Felipe Ferreira e Silva;Geraldo Felipe Ferreira e Silva;Eder Marques Silva;Mariana da Silva Azevedo;Mike Anderson Corazon Guivin

  • Understanding the genetic regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in plants - Tools for breeding purple varieties of fruits and vegetables.

    Samuel Chaves-Silva;Adolfo Luís dos Santos;Antonio Chalfun-Júnior;Jian Zhao

  • Comprehensive Profiling of Ethylene Response Factor Expression Identifies Ripening-Associated ERF Genes and Their Link to Key Regulators of Fruit Ripening in Tomato

    Mingchun Liu;Bruna Lima Gomes;Isabelle Mila;Eduardo Purgatto

  • Characterization of the procera Tomato Mutant Shows Novel Functions of the SlDELLA Protein in the Control of Flower Morphology, Cell Division and Expansion, and the Auxin-Signaling Pathway during Fruit-Set and Development

    Esther Carrera;Omar Ruiz-Rivero;Lazaro Eustaquio Pereira Peres;Alejandro Atares

  • Differential ultrastructural changes in tomato hormonal mutants exposed to cadmium

    Priscila L. Gratão;Carolina C. Monteiro;Mônica L. Rossi;Adriana P. Martinelli

  • Biochemical dissection of diageotropica and Never ripe tomato mutants to Cd-stressful conditions.

    Priscila L. Gratão;Carolina C. Monteiro;Rogério F. Carvalho;Tiago Tezotto

  • Capsaicinoids: Pungency beyond Capsicum

    Emmanuel Rezende Naves;Lucas de Ávila Silva;Ronan Sulpice;Wagner L Araújo

  • Biochemical responses of the ethylene-insensitive Never ripe tomato mutant subjected to cadmium and sodium stresses

    Carolina C. Monteiro;Rogério F. Carvalho;Priscila L. Gratão;Giselle Carvalho

  • Genome editing as a tool to achieve the crop ideotype and de novo domestication of wild relatives: Case study in tomato

    Agustin Zsögön;Tomas Cermak;Dan Voytas;Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira Peres

  • Brassinosteroids interact negatively with jasmonates in the formation of anti-herbivory traits in tomato

    Marcelo Lattarulo Campos;Marcílio de Almeida;Mônica Lanzoni Rossi;Adriana Pinheiro Martinelli

  • Inhibition of Auxin Transport from the Ovary or from the Apical Shoot Induces Parthenocarpic Fruit-Set in Tomato Mediated by Gibberellins

    Juan Carlos Serrani;Esther Carrera;Omar Ruiz-Rivero;Lina Gallego-Giraldo

  • Probing the hormonal activity of fractionated molecular humic components in tomato auxin mutants

    L.P. Canellas;D.J. Dantas;N.O. Aguiar;L.E.P. Peres

  • Light, Ethylene and Auxin Signaling Interaction Regulates Carotenoid Biosynthesis During Tomato Fruit Ripening

    Aline Bertinatto Cruz;Ricardo Ernesto Bianchetti;Frederico Rocha Rodrigues Alves;Eduardo Purgatto

  • Changes in root development of Arabidopsis promoted by organic matter from oxisols

    L. B Dobbss;L. O. Medici;Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira Peres;L. E. Pino-Nunes

  • The Rg1 allele as a valuable tool for genetic transformation of the tomato 'Micro-Tom' model system

    Lilian E. Pino;Lilian E. Pino;Simone Lombardi-Crestana;Mariana S. Azevedo;Danielle C. Scotton

  • De novo domestication of wild species to create crops with increased resilience and nutritional value.

    Karla Gasparini;Juliene dos Reis Moreira;Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira Peres;Agustin Zsögön

  • Tomato floral induction and flower development are orchestrated by the interplay between gibberellin and two unrelated microRNA-controlled modules

    Geraldo F. F. Silva;Eder M. Silva;Joao P. O. Correa;Mateus H. Vicente

  • microRNA159-targeted SlGAMYB transcription factors are required for fruit set in tomato

    Eder Marques da Silva;Eder Marques da Silva;Geraldo Felipe Ferreira E Silva;Débora Brussolo Bidoia;Débora Brussolo Bidoia;Mariana da Silva Azevedo

  • Shoot regeneration capacity from roots and transgenic hairy roots of tomato cultivars and wild related species

    Lázaro E. P. Peres;Patrícia G. Morgante;Cláudia Vecchi;Jane E. Kraus

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Figueira
Antonio Figueira Universidade de São Paulo
Luciano Freschi
Luciano Freschi Universidade de São Paulo
Ricardo Antunes Azevedo
Ricardo Antunes Azevedo Universidade de São Paulo
Wagner L. Araújo
Wagner L. Araújo Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Priscila Lupino Gratão
Priscila Lupino Gratão Sao Paulo State University
Eduardo Purgatto
Eduardo Purgatto Universidade de São Paulo
Luciano Pasqualoto Canellas
Luciano Pasqualoto Canellas State University of Norte Fluminense
Fábio Lopes Olivares
Fábio Lopes Olivares State University of Norte Fluminense
Samuel C. V. Martins
Samuel C. V. Martins Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Alessandro Piccolo
Alessandro Piccolo University of Naples Federico II

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira Peres

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles