World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
95
Citations
101435
World Ranking
618
National Ranking
339

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
101827
World Ranking
9448
National Ranking
4875

Lawrence A. Donehower publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence A. Donehower sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 236 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Lawrence A. Donehower D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence A. Donehower sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence A. Donehower is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily centers on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a notable focus on cancer research, molecular biology techniques, genetics, and oncology.

Donehower's publication record spans several specialized subfields including molecular biology, cancer research, genetics, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and oncology. Their work addresses topics such as cancer genomics and diagnostics, glioma diagnosis and treatment, epigenetics and DNA methylation, sarcoma diagnosis and treatment, virus-based gene therapy research, molecular biology techniques and applications, and evolution and genetic dynamics.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Donehower include:

  • A pediatric brain tumor atlas of genes deregulated by somatic genomic rearrangement, 2021, Nature Communications
  • K-Ras and p53 mouse model with molecular characteristics of human rhabdomyosarcoma and translational applications, 2022, Disease Models & Mechanisms
  • WIP1 dephosphorylation of p27Kip1 Serine 140 destabilizes p27Kip1 and reverses anti-proliferative effects of ATM phosphorylation, 2020, Cell Cycle
  • A general calculus of fitness landscapes finds genes under selection in cancers, 2022, Genome Research
  • EPIMUTESTR: a nearest neighbor machine learning approach to predict cancer driver genes from the evolutionary action of coding variants, 2022, Nucleic Acids Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Donehower include:

  • Chad J. Creighton
  • Teng-Kuei Hsu
  • Jennifer Asmussen
  • Byung-Kwon Choi
  • Panagiotis Katsonis

Donehower's research has been published across various venues, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach. These venues include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Nature Communications
  • Disease Models & Mechanisms
  • Genome Research
  • Cell Cycle

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours

    Daniel C. Koboldt;Robert S. Fulton;Michael D. McLellan;Heather Schmidt

  • The cancer genome atlas pan-cancer analysis project

    John N Weinstein;John N Weinstein;Eric A. Collisson;Gordon B Mills;Kenna R Mills Shaw;Kenna R Mills Shaw

  • Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer

    Donna M. Muzny;Matthew N. Bainbridge;Kyle Chang;Huyen H. Dinh

  • Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways

    Roger McLendon;Allan Friedman;Darrell Bigner;Erwin G. Van Meir

  • Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours

    Lawrence A. Donehower;Michele Harvey;Betty L. Slagle;Mark J. McArthur

  • The Immune Landscape of Cancer

    Vésteinn Thorsson;David L Gibbs;Scott D Brown;Denise Wolf

  • Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma

    John N Weinstein;Rehan Akbani;Bradley McIntosh Broom;Wenyi Wang

  • Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in The Cancer Genome Atlas

    Francisco Sanchez-Vega;Marco Mina;Joshua Armenia;Walid K. Chatila

  • Cell-of-Origin Patterns Dominate the Molecular Classification of 10,000 Tumors from 33 Types of Cancer.

    Katherine A. Hoadley;Christina Yau;Christina Yau;Toshinori Hinoue;Denise M. Wolf

  • Comprehensive Characterization of Cancer Driver Genes and Mutations.

    Matthew H Bailey;Collin Tokheim;Eduard Porta-Pardo;Sohini Sengupta

  • Comprehensive and Integrative Genomic Characterization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Adrian Ally;Miruna Balasundaram;Rebecca Carlsen;Eric Chuah

  • Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint

    Qinghua Liu;Saritha Guntuku;Xian Shu Cui;Shuhei Matsuoka

  • p53 mutant mice that display early ageing-associated phenotypes

    Stuart D. Tyner;Sundaresan Venkatachalam;Jene Choi;Stephen Jones

  • Rescue of embryonic lethality in Mdm2-deficient mice by absence of p53

    Stephen N. Jones;Amy E. Roe;Lawrence A. Donehower;Allan Bradley

  • Genomic and Functional Approaches to Understanding Cancer Aneuploidy

    Alison M. Taylor;Alison M. Taylor;Juliann Shih;Gavin Ha;Gavin Ha;Galen F. Gao

  • Genomic and Molecular Landscape of DNA Damage Repair Deficiency across The Cancer Genome Atlas

    Theo A Knijnenburg;Linghua Wang;Michael T Zimmermann;Nyasha Chambwe

  • The Somatic Genomic Landscape of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma

    Caleb F. Davis;Christopher J. Ricketts;Min Wang;Lixing Yang

  • Aging hematopoietic stem cells decline in function and exhibit epigenetic dysregulation.

    Stuart M Chambers;Chad A Shaw;Catherine Gatza;C. Joseph Fisk

  • Trans-ancestry mutational landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma genomes

    Yasushi Totoki;Kenji Tatsuno;Kyle R. Covington;Hiroki Ueda

  • The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project

    Kyle Chang;Chad J Creighton;Caleb Davis;Lawrence Donehower

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan Bradley
Allan Bradley University of Cambridge
Richard A. Gibbs
Richard A. Gibbs Baylor College of Medicine
David A. Wheeler
David A. Wheeler Baylor College of Medicine
Chad J. Creighton
Chad J. Creighton Baylor College of Medicine
Xiongbin Lu
Xiongbin Lu Indiana University
John N. Weinstein
John N. Weinstein The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Julie M. Gastier-Foster
Julie M. Gastier-Foster Baylor College of Medicine
Gad Getz
Gad Getz Broad Institute
Donna M. Muzny
Donna M. Muzny Baylor College of Medicine
Matthew Meyerson
Matthew Meyerson Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While studying Molecular Biology opens many research and lab opportunities, some students consider combining their expertise with careers in health care. For those who hold an associate’s degree in nursing and wish to advance, exploring adn to np bridge programs can pave the way toward nurse practitioner roles, complementing a background in the biological sciences.

If you do not have a nursing background but want to enter nursing through an accelerated route, direct entry msn online programs offer an efficient path to jumpstart your career. These programs are ideal for science graduates considering a pivot to nursing leadership.

Quality and affordability are important when choosing a program. Reviewing top rated online nursing schools wgu can help you select reputable institutions with strong online learning options to fit your needs.

Furthermore, RNs with a bachelor’s can benefit from rn to msn bridge programs that offer flexibility and more specialized career pathways. These online degrees open doors to advanced nursing roles and management positions—ideal for those with a grounding in molecular biology who want to make an impact in clinical settings.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence A. Donehower

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles