World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 48 4493 4323 1288 1188 196 11297

Kevin E. Lansey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kevin E. Lansey between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kevin E. Lansey published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2009. 7 of the 216 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2009. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 6 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 5 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
1985 2025

216 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kevin E. Lansey: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 5
1988 1
1989 6
1990 5
1991 3
1992 3
1993 2
1994 5
1995 0
1996 3
1997 3
1998 0
1999 6
2000 3
2001 9
2002 4
2003 5
2004 8
2005 7
2006 5
2007 6
2008 3
2009 20
2010 6
2011 18
2012 11
2013 11
2014 8
2015 6
2016 6
2017 1
2018 5
2019 0
2020 4
2021 13
2022 1
2023 6
2024 5
2025 2
Total 216
Download as CSV

Kevin E. Lansey publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin E. Lansey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 188–197 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 196 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378 196
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Kevin E. Lansey D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin E. Lansey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271 48
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Kevin E. Lansey is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States, focusing on research within engineering and environmental science. Their work primarily explores civil and structural engineering, water science and technology, ocean engineering, health, toxicology, and environmental engineering.

The scientist's research centers on various key topics including water systems and optimization, water resources management and optimization, water treatment and disinfection, urban stormwater management solutions, water quality monitoring technologies, water-energy-food nexus studies, and geotechnical engineering and underground structures.

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Urban resilience and green infrastructure systems: towards a multidimensional evaluation," 2020, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
  • "Multiphase DMA Design Methodology Based on Graph Theory and Many-Objective Optimization," 2020, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
  • "Net Zero Urban Water from Concept to Applications: Integrating Natural, Built, and Social Systems for Responsive and Adaptive Solutions," 2020, ACS ES&T Water
  • "Comparison of Imputation Methods for End-User Demands in Water Distribution Systems," 2021, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
  • "Modular interdependency analysis for water distribution systems," 2021, Water Research

Their frequent coauthors include Sanghoon Jun, Sarai Díaz, Donghwi Jung, Adriana A. Zúñiga-Terán, and Sasha Schück.

Much of their research is published in journals such as the Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, where they have nine publications, followed by the Journal of Environmental Engineering with two publications. Other venues include Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, ACS ES&T Water, and Water Resources Management.

Best Publications

  • Optimization of Water Distribution Network Design Using the Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm

    Muzaffar M. Eusuff;Kevin E. Lansey

  • Shuffled frog-leaping algorithm: a memetic meta-heuristic for discrete optimization

    Muzaffar Eusuff;Kevin Lansey;Fayzul Pasha

  • Battle of the network models: Epilogue

    Thomas M. Walski;E. Downey Brill;Johannes Gessler;Ian C. Goulter

  • Reliability‐Based Optimization Model for Water Distribution Systems

    Yu Chun Su;Larry W. Mays;Ning Duan;Kevin E. Lansey;Kevin E. Lansey

  • Optimal Control of Water Supply Pumping Systems

    Lindell E. Ormsbee;Kevin E. Lansey

  • Optimization Model for Water Distribution System Design

    Kevin E. Lansey;Kevin E. Lansey;Larry W. Mays

  • Water Distribution System Design Under Uncertainties

    Kevin E. Lansey;Ning Duan;Larry W. Mays;Yeou Koung Tung

  • Optimal Pump Operations Considering Pump Switches

    Kevin E. Lansey;Kofi Awumah

  • Optimization-availability-based design of water-distribution networks

    M. John Cullinane;Kevin E. Lansey;Larry W. Mays

  • Battle of the Water Calibration Networks

    Avi Ostfeld;Elad Salomons;Lindell Ormsbee;James G. Uber

  • Calibration assessment and data collection for water distribution networks

    K. E. Lansey;W. El-Shorbagy;I. Ahmed;J. Araujo

  • Parameter Estimation for Water Distribution Networks

    Kevin E. Lansey;Chuda Basnet

  • Fate of organics during soil-aquifer treatment: sustainability of removals in the field.

    David M Quanrud;Jennifer Hafer;Martin M Karpiscak;Jianmin Zhang

  • Optimal Reliability‐Based Design of Pumping and Distribution Systems

    Ning Duan;Larry W. Mays;Kevin E. Lansey

  • Reliability'Availability Analysis of Municipal Water Distribution Networks: Case Studies

    Debbie S. Shinstine;Iftekhar Ahmed;Kevin E. Lansey

  • Reliable water supply system design under uncertainty

    G. Chung;K. Lansey;G. Bayraksan

  • Real-time demand estimation and confidence limit analysis for water distribution systems

    Doosun Kang;Kevin Lansey

  • Life Cycle Analysis for Water and Wastewater Pipe Materials

    Fei Du;Gwendolyn J. Woods;Doosun Kang;Kevin E. Lansey

  • A general water supply planning model: Evaluation of decentralized treatment

    G. Chung;K. Lansey;P. Blowers;P. Brooks

  • Resilience/Availability Analysis of Municipal Water Distribution System Incorporating Adaptive Pump Operation

    Baoyu Zhuang;Kevin Lansey;Doosun Kang

Frequent Co-Authors

Larry W. Mays
Larry W. Mays Arizona State University
Avi Ostfeld
Avi Ostfeld Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
David S. Brookshire
David S. Brookshire University of New Mexico
David C. Goodrich
David C. Goodrich US Department of Agriculture
Christopher A. Scott
Christopher A. Scott University of Arizona
Martin Reinhard
Martin Reinhard Stanford University
Juliet C. Stromberg
Juliet C. Stromberg Arizona State University
Mark Bakker
Mark Bakker Delft University of Technology
Charles P. Gerba
Charles P. Gerba University of Arizona
Ian L. Pepper
Ian L. Pepper University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens many doors to complementary online degrees and alternative career pathways. Many students broaden their skills with additional certifications or degrees. Expanding your expertise can help you stand out in the competitive technology job market.

For those interested in the intersection of law and technology, choosing one of the cheapest aba-approved paralegal programs can provide a legal foundation for roles in patent law or intellectual property management.

Engineering professionals looking to manage people or tech teams might benefit from a focus on human resources. Consider exploring an online masters of human resources to develop skills in talent management, organizational behavior, and workplace diversity.

Communication is another vital skill for tech leaders. Earning an online communications masters helps refine messaging and project management abilities, which are valuable in any engineering or technology role.

Lastly, engineers and technology specialists often launch startups or lead innovative projects. An online mba entrepreneurship equips you with advanced business, strategy, and leadership skills that set the stage for success in today’s fast-paced tech environment.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin E. Lansey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles