World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 34 8062 7478 521 515 131 3845

Guangcai Feng publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Guangcai Feng between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Guangcai Feng published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2022. 19 of the 153 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2022. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 9 publications
2004 2025

153 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Guangcai Feng: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 3
2009 2
2010 1
2011 1
2012 7
2013 3
2014 5
2015 6
2016 10
2017 13
2018 14
2019 12
2020 9
2021 15
2022 18
2023 14
2024 10
2025 9
Total 153
Download as CSV

Guangcai Feng publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guangcai Feng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 131 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557 131
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Guangcai Feng D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guangcai Feng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366 34
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Guangcai Feng is affiliated with Central South University in China. Their research spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Engineering, with a substantial body of work published across these domains.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering

Within these fields, Feng has focused on several subfields of study:

  • Geophysics
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Environmental Engineering

Their research topics are diverse but centered on remote sensing and geophysical phenomena. Key topics covered in their publications include:

  • Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques
  • Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing

Feng has contributed extensively to scientific literature, with recent notable publications such as:

  • Pre- and post-failure spatial-temporal deformation pattern of the Baige landslide retrieved from multiple radar and optical satellite images (2020), published in Engineering Geology
  • Coseismic and Early Postseismic Slip Models of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo Earthquake (Western China) Estimated by Space-Based Geodetic Data (2021), published in Geophysical Research Letters
  • Complete three-dimensional coseismic displacements due to the 2021 Maduo earthquake in Qinghai Province, China from Sentinel-1 and ALOS-2 SAR images (2022), published in Science China Earth Sciences
  • Displacement history and potential triggering factors of Baige landslides, China revealed by optical imagery time series (2020), published in Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Coseismic Kinematics of the 2023 Kahramanmaras, Turkey Earthquake Sequence From InSAR and Optical Data (2023), published in Geophysical Research Letters

Their publication venues most frequently include:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • National Remote Sensing Bulletin
  • Sensors
  • IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing

Feng has collaborated regularly with a group of coauthors, including:

  • Zhiwei Li
  • Zhiqiang Xiong
  • Yuedong Wang
  • Lijia He
  • Wenbin Xu

Best Publications

  • Atmospheric effects on InSAR measurements and their mitigation

    Xiao-li Ding;Zhi-wei Li;Jian-jun Zhu;Guang-cai Feng

  • Mapping ground surface deformation using temporarily coherent point SAR interferometry: Application to Los Angeles Basin

    Lei Zhang;Zhong Lu;Xiaoli Ding;Hyung-sup Jung

  • Monitoring surface deformation over permafrost with an improved SBAS-InSAR algorithm: With emphasis on climatic factors modeling

    Rong Zhao;Zhi-wei Li;Guang-cai Feng;Qi-jie Wang

  • Coseismic fault slip of the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake estimated from InSAR and GPS measurements

    GuangCai Feng;Eric A. Hetland;XiaoLi Ding;ZhiWei Li

  • Earthquake-triggered 2018 Palu Valley landslides enabled by wet rice cultivation

    Kyle E Bradley;Rishav Mallick;Harisma Andikagumi;Judith Hubbard

  • Deriving Dynamic Subsidence of Coal Mining Areas Using InSAR and Logistic Model

    Ze Fa Yang;Zhiwei Li;Jianjun Zhu;Huiwei Yi

  • Coastal Subsidence Monitoring Associated with Land Reclamation Using the Point Target Based SBAS-InSAR Method: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China

    Bing Xu;Guangcai Feng;Zhiwei Li;Qijie Wang

  • Transpressional Rupture Cascade of the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake, New Zealand

    Wenbin Xu;Guangcai Feng;Lingsen Meng;Ailin Zhang

  • Geodetic model of the 2015 April 25 Mw 7.8 Gorkha Nepal Earthquake and Mw 7.3 aftershock estimated from InSAR and GPS data

    Guangcai Feng;Zhiwei Li;Xinjian Shan;Lei Zhang

  • A Novel Multitemporal InSAR Model for Joint Estimation of Deformation Rates and Orbital Errors

    Lei Zhang;Xiaoli Ding;Zhong Lu;Hyung-Sup Jung

  • InSAR analysis of surface deformation over permafrost to estimate active layer thickness based on one-dimensional heat transfer model of soils.

    Zhiwei Li;Rong Zhao;Jun Hu;Lianxing Wen

  • Correcting atmospheric effects on InSAR with MERIS water vapour data and elevation‐dependent interpolation model

    Z. W. Li;Wenbin Xu;Wenbin Xu;G. C. Feng;J. Hu

  • Coseismic and Early Postseismic Slip Models of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo Earthquake (Western China) Estimated by Space‐Based Geodetic Data

    Unknown

  • Toward full exploitation of coherent and incoherent information in Sentinel-1 TOPS data for retrieving surface displacement: Application to the 2016 Kumamoto (Japan) earthquake

    Houjun Jiang;Guangcai Feng;Teng Wang;Teng Wang;Roland Bürgmann

  • Deriving Spatio-Temporal Development of Ground Subsidence Due to Subway Construction and Operation in Delta Regions with PS-InSAR Data: A Case Study in Guangzhou, China

    Huiqiang Wang;Guangcai Feng;Bing Xu;Yongping Yu

  • Calibration of an InSAR-Derived Coseimic Deformation Map Associated With the 2011 Mw-9.0 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake

    Guangcai Feng;Xiaoli Ding;Zhiwei Li;Jiang Mi

  • Pre- and post-failure spatial-temporal deformation pattern of the Baige landslide retrieved from multiple radar and optical satellite images

    Zhiqiang Xiong;Guangcai Feng;Zhixiong Feng;Lu Miao

  • Complete three-dimensional coseismic displacements due to the 2021 Maduo earthquake in Qinghai Province, China from Sentinel-1 and ALOS-2 SAR images

    Unknown

  • Locating and defining underground goaf caused by coal mining from space-borne SAR interferometry

    Zefa Yang;Zefa Yang;Zhiwei Li;Jianjun Zhu;Huiwei Yi

  • Coseismic Kinematics of the 2023 Kahramanmaras, Turkey Earthquake Sequence From InSAR and Optical Data

    Unknown

  • Modeling minimum and maximum detectable deformation gradients of interferometric SAR measurements

    Mi Jiang;Mi Jiang;Zhiwei Li;Xiaoli Ding;Xiaoli Ding;Jianjun Zhu

  • Stochastic modeling for time series InSAR: with emphasis on atmospheric effects

    Yunmeng Cao;Zhiwei Li;Jianchao Wei;Jun Hu

  • Spatio-Temporal Error Sources Analysis and Accuracy Improvement in Landsat 8 Image Ground Displacement Measurements

    Chao Ding;Guangcai Feng;Zhiwei Li;Xinjian Shan

Frequent Co-Authors

Zhiwei Li
Zhiwei Li Central South University
Xiaoli Ding
Xiaoli Ding Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Sigurjón Jónsson
Sigurjón Jónsson King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Lin Liu
Lin Liu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Roland Bürgmann
Roland Bürgmann University of California, Berkeley
Mingsheng Liao
Mingsheng Liao Wuhan University
Zhong Lu
Zhong Lu Southern Methodist University
Ziyadin Cakir
Ziyadin Cakir Istanbul Technical University
Yann Klinger
Yann Klinger Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Semih Ergintav
Semih Ergintav Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens diverse educational opportunities beyond traditional paths. For those interested in knowledge management and information curation, pursuing an ala accredited mls programs can be an excellent choice. These programs prepare students for careers in libraries, archives, and information centers, complementing Earth Science expertise with strong organizational skills.

If you aspire to work in information sciences, a degree in library science offers a broader scope of study in managing, preserving, and providing access to knowledge. This pathway aligns well with environmental research and data management roles.

For those drawn to visual documentation and remote sensing aspects of Earth Science, exploring online creative degrees can be beneficial. Online photography degree online programs provide valuable skills in imagery, which are crucial in environmental monitoring and scientific communication.

Veterans interested in transitioning into these fields will find supportive options through military friendly online photography degree programs. These programs accommodate unique needs and leverage veterans’ discipline and experience for career success.

Best Scientists Citing Guangcai Feng

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles