What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Law
- Social science
- Epistemology
His primary scientific interests are in Public relations, Politics, Critical theory, Power and Pragmatism.
John Forester brings together Public relations and Interpretation to produce work in his papers.
His research integrates issues of Policy studies, Competition, Bounded rationality and Law and economics in his study of Politics.
In his study, Policy analysis is strongly linked to Judgement, which falls under the umbrella field of Policy studies.
His Bounded rationality research integrates issues from Transportation planning, Misinformation, Planner and Information management.
Power is frequently linked to Negotiation in his study.
His most cited work include:
- Planning in the face of power (1512 citations)
- The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (1171 citations)
- The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes (1156 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
John Forester spends much of his time researching Public relations, Politics, Public administration, Power and Epistemology.
His research in Public relations focuses on subjects like Negotiation, which are connected to Deliberation and Public participation.
He interconnects Citizen journalism, Critical theory, Social psychology and Policy analysis in the investigation of issues within Politics.
His research in Public administration intersects with topics in Policy studies, Public policy and Administration.
His Power research incorporates themes from Reflective practice, Face, Engineering ethics and Pragmatism.
His Epistemology study incorporates themes from Social science and Rhetoric.
He most often published in these fields:
- Public relations (23.23%)
- Politics (24.24%)
- Public administration (13.13%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Context (5.05%)
- Epistemology (15.15%)
- Public relations (23.23%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Context, Epistemology, Public relations, Engineering ethics and Politics.
The concepts of his Epistemology study are interwoven with issues in Rhetoric and Public policy.
His Public relations study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Mistake and Land use.
His Engineering ethics study also includes fields such as
- Knowledge management which is related to area like Practice theory, Citizen journalism, Power, Social connectedness and Regional planning,
- Reflective practice that connect with fields like Action research.
His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Social psychology and Politics.
His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Corporate governance, Public participation, Negotiation, Dispute resolution and Normative.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Challenges of Deliberation and Participation (13 citations)
- Enacting reflective and deliberative practices in action research (11 citations)
- Reimagining planning: moving from reflective practice to deliberative practice - a first exploration in the Italian context (8 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Social science
- Epistemology
John Forester focuses on Action research, Engineering ethics, Reflective practice, Public relations and Politics.
His Action research research includes themes of Policy analysis, Participatory GIS and Environmental resource management.
His work carried out in the field of Engineering ethics brings together such families of science as Knowledge management, Social connectedness, Power, Citizen journalism and Regional planning.
His work on Situated expands to the thematically related Reflective practice.
His Public relations study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Compassion, Natural experiment and Ignorance.
His work on Deliberation as part of general Politics study is frequently linked to Context, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
