World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
39
Citations
11487
World Ranking
5510
National Ranking
2608

Thomas Webler publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Webler sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 108 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Thomas Webler D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Webler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Webler is affiliated with Keene State College in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within the social sciences and environmental science, with a particular emphasis on sociology, political science, global and planetary change, health, toxicology, mutagenesis, building and construction, and communication.

Their main research topics include:

  • Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Underground infrastructure and sustainability

Thomas Webler has contributed to a number of scientific publications, typically focusing on the intersection of risk analysis, environmental policy, and public attitudes. Selected recent papers include:

  • "Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors about Cigarette-Butt Littering among College-Aged Adults in the United States," 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Unpacking the idea of democratic community consent-based siting for energy infrastructure," 2020, Journal of Risk Research

In addition, Webler has frequently collaborated with various researchers. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Seth Tuler
  • Bonnie Ram
  • Roger E. Kasperson
  • Jeannette Sutton
  • Karin Jakubowski

Their publications have appeared predominantly in these venues:

  • Energy Research & Social Science
  • Risk Analysis
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Environmental Science & Policy
  • Journal of Risk Research

Their research addresses complex societal and environmental issues by analyzing public perception and policy frameworks related to risk and sustainability. This work intersects with interdisciplinary domains focusing on climate change, environmental health, and energy infrastructure governance.

Best Publications

  • Fairness and competence in citizen participation : evaluating models for environmental discourse

    Ortwin Renn;Thomas Webler;Peter M. Wiedemann

  • Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation

    Ortwin Renn;Thomas Webler;Peter Wiedemann

  • Risk, uncertainty, and rational action

    Carlo C. Jaeger;Thomas Webler;Eugene A. Rosa;Ortwin Renn

  • Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective

    Thomas Webler;Hans Kastenholz;Ortwin Renn

  • What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public

    Thomas Webler;Seth Tuler;Robert F Krueger

  • “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick

    Thomas Webler

  • Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure

    Ortwin Renn;Thomas Webler;Horst Rakel;Peter Dienel

  • Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Theoretical Reflections from a Case Study

    Thomas Webler;Seth Tuler

  • A Brief Primer on Participation: Philosophy and Practice

    Thomas Webler;Ortwin Renn

  • Four Perspectives on Public Participation Process in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making: Combined Results from 10 Case Studies

    Thomas Webler;Seth Tuler

  • Voices from the Forest: What Participants Expect of a Public Participation Process

    Seth Tuler;Thomas Webler

  • The craft and theory of public participation: a dialectical process

    Thomas Webler

  • Social norms and efficacy beliefs drive the Alarmed segment[rsquor]s public-sphere climate actions

    Kathryn L. Doherty;Kathryn L. Doherty;Thomas N. Webler

  • A novel approach to reducing uncertainty: The group Delphi☆

    Thomas Webler;Debra Levine;Horst Rakel;Ortwin Renn

  • Risks and risk governance in unconventional shale gas development.

    Mitchell J. Small;Paul C. Stern;Elizabeth Bomberg;Susan M. Christopherson

  • The social amplification of risk framework: New perspectives

    Unknown

  • Public Participation in Watershed Management Planning: Views on Process from People in the Field

    Thomas Webler;Seth Tuler

  • Unlocking the Puzzle of Public Participation

    Thomas Webler;Seth Tuler

  • A Need for Discourse on Citizen Participation: Objectives and Structure of the Book

    Ortwin Renn;Thomas Webler;Peter Wiedemann

  • Integrating scientific and local knowledge to inform risk-based management approaches for climate adaptation

    Nathan P. Kettle;Kirstin Dow;Seth Tuler;Thomas Webler

  • Procedural and Substantive Fairness in Landfill Siting: A Swiss Case Study

    Ortwin Renn;Thomas Webler;Hans Kastenholz

Frequent Co-Authors

Ortwin Renn
Ortwin Renn University of Stuttgart
Eugene A. Rosa
Eugene A. Rosa Washington State University
Paul C. Stern
Paul C. Stern Social and Environmental Research Institute
Baruch Fischhoff
Baruch Fischhoff Carnegie Mellon University
Thomas Dietz
Thomas Dietz Michigan State University
Mitchell J. Small
Mitchell J. Small Carnegie Mellon University
William R. Freudenburg
William R. Freudenburg University of California, Santa Barbara
Steve Rayner
Steve Rayner University of Oxford
Barbara Zielinska
Barbara Zielinska Desert Research Institute
Robert B. Jackson
Robert B. Jackson Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering a future in Social Sciences and Humanities, online degree programs offer flexible routes to both advanced study and professional growth. Many students are drawn to msw accelerated programs which can prepare graduates for rewarding roles in social work in just one to two years. These programs typically balance practical training with online coursework, making them ideal for working adults.

If psychology interests you, a 2-year psychology degree online is another fast-paced option. These degrees mix foundational theory with applied learning, opening doors to entry-level positions or graduate studies.

Accreditation is crucial for counseling careers. Many choose cacrep accredited universities to ensure their programs meet industry standards—an important step for future licensure and career advancement.

For those passionate about supporting families and relationships, obtaining a marriage and family therapist degree online provides the essential skills for this meaningful path.

Whichever specialty you choose, online education in these fields provides flexible, high-quality training aligned with strong career pathways in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Webler

Trending Scientists