World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
72
Citations
22099
World Ranking
6199
National Ranking
49

Alexander Loy publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Loy sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 176 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Alexander Loy D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Loy sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander Loy is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria and works primarily in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Environmental Science. Their research spans molecular biology and ecology, with additional focus on environmental chemistry, food science, and pharmacology as related subfields.

The research topics covered by Alexander Loy include:

  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Alexander Loy has contributed to multiple scholarly publications, with frequent appearances in these venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Microbiome
  • The ISME Journal
  • Nature Microbiology
  • Microbiology Spectrum

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Alexander Loy include:

  • Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges (2020, Microbiome)
  • Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities (2020, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY)
  • An Economical and Flexible Dual Barcoding, Two-Step PCR Approach for Highly Multiplexed Amplicon Sequencing (2021, Frontiers in Microbiology)
  • Novel taxa of Acidobacteriota implicated in seafloor sulfur cycling (2021, The ISME Journal)
  • Anaerobic bacterial degradation of protein and lipid macromolecules in subarctic marine sediment (2020, The ISME Journal)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Alexander Loy include:

  • Bela Hausmann
  • Craig W. Herbold
  • Petra Pjevac
  • Thomas Rattei
  • Buck Hanson

Best Publications

  • Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges

    Gabriele Berg;Daria Rybakova;Doreen Fischer;Tomislav Cernava

  • A genomic catalog of Earth’s microbiomes

    Stephen Nayfach;Simon Roux;Rekha Seshadri;Daniel Udwary

  • Oligonucleotide microarray for 16S rRNA gene-based detection of all recognized lineages of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes in the environment.

    Alexander Loy;Angelika Lehner;Natuschka Lee;Justyna Adamczyk

  • Bacterial community composition and function in sewage treatment systems

    Michael Wagner;Alexander Loy

  • amoA-based consensus phylogeny of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and deep sequencing of amoA genes from soils of four different geographic regions.

    Michael Pester;Thomas Rattei;Stefan Flechl;Alexander Gröngröft

  • probeBase—an online resource for rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes: new features 2007

    Alexander Loy;Frank Maixner;Michael Wagner;Matthias Horn

  • Microbial community composition and function in wastewater treatment plants

    Michael Wagner;Alexander Loy;Regina Nogueira;Ulrike Purkhold

  • Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities

    David W Waite;David W Waite;Maria Chuvochina;Claus Pelikan;Donovan H Parks

  • Barcoded Primers Used in Multiplex Amplicon Pyrosequencing Bias Amplification

    David Berry;Karim Ben Mahfoudh;Michael Wagner;Alexander Loy

  • probeBase: an online resource for rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes

    Alexander Loy;Matthias Horn;Michael Wagner

  • The microbial community composition of a nitrifying-denitrifying activated sludge from an industrial sewage treatment plant analyzed by the full-cycle rRNA approach.

    Stefan Juretschko;Alexander Loy;Angelika Lehner;Michael Wagner

  • Genome-guided design of a defined mouse microbiota that confers colonization resistance against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

    Sandrine Brugiroux;Markus Beutler;Carina Pfann;Debora Garzetti

  • Sulfate-reducing microorganisms in wetlands - fameless actors in carbon cycling and climate change.

    Michael Pester;Klaus-Holger Knorr;Michael W. Friedrich;Michael Wagner

  • Temporal Bacterial Community Dynamics Vary Among Ulcerative Colitis Patients After Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

    Sieglinde Angelberger;Walter Reinisch;Athanasios Makristathis;Cornelia Lichtenberger

  • Expanded diversity of microbial groups that shape the dissimilatory sulfur cycle.

    Karthik Anantharaman;Karthik Anantharaman;Bela Hausmann;Sean P. Jungbluth;Sean P. Jungbluth;Rose S. Kantor

  • A ‘rare biosphere’ microorganism contributes to sulfate reduction in a peatland

    Michael Pester;Norbert Bittner;Pinsurang Deevong;Pinsurang Deevong;Michael Wagner

  • Phylogenetic and environmental diversity of DsrAB-type dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductases

    Albert Leopold Müller;Kasper Urup Kjeldsen;Thomas Rattei;Michael Pester

  • NxrB encoding the beta subunit of nitrite oxidoreductase as functional and phylogenetic marker for nitrite-oxidizing Nitrospira.

    Michael Pester;Frank Maixner;David Berry;Thomas Rattei

  • Phylotype-level 16S rRNA analysis reveals new bacterial indicators of health state in acute murine colitis

    David Berry;Clarissa Schwab;Gabriel Milinovich;Jochen Reichert

  • The life sulfuric: microbial ecology of sulfur cycling in marine sediments.

    Kenneth Wasmund;Marc Mußmann;Alexander Loy

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Wagner
Michael Wagner University of Vienna
Thomas Rattei
Thomas Rattei University of Vienna
Bo Barker Jørgensen
Bo Barker Jørgensen Aarhus University
Tim Urich
Tim Urich University of Greifswald
Clarissa Schwab
Clarissa Schwab Aarhus University
Holger Daims
Holger Daims University of Vienna
Matthias Horn
Matthias Horn University of Vienna
Angelika Lehner
Angelika Lehner University of Zurich
Bärbel Stecher
Bärbel Stecher Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Thomas Decker
Thomas Decker University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Alexander Loy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles