World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
42
Citations
30478
World Ranking
1437
National Ranking
605

Martha S. Feldman publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha S. Feldman sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 84 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Martha S. Feldman D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha S. Feldman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martha S. Feldman is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields primarily within Business, Management and Accounting, alongside contributions to Social Sciences. Their work further breaks down into subfields such as Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, and Strategy and Management.

Their research topics include Management and Organizational Studies, Complex Systems and Decision Making, Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence, Information Systems Theories and Implementation, Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research, Health Policy Implementation Science, and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics.

Frequent co-authors in their publications include Brian T. Pentland, Claus Rerup, Luciana D'Adderio, Katharina Dittrich, and David Seidl.

Among the venues where Martha S. Feldman has regularly published are:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Organizational Research Methods
  • Representations
  • Journal of Management Inquiry
  • Strategic Organization

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Martha S. Feldman include:

  • "Routine dynamics: Toward a critical conversation," 2022, Strategic Organization
  • "Enacting the Logic of Possibility in Organizations and Management1," 2020, Perspectives on Public Management and Governance

Other notable influential papers in their scholarly network, although not authored by Feldman directly, which reflect the research context they engage with, include:

  • "Coding Practices and Iterativity: Beyond Templates for Analyzing Qualitative Data," 2020, Organizational Research Methods
  • "Moving Beyond Templates: A Bricolage Approach to Conducting Trustworthy Qualitative Research," 2020, Organizational Research Methods
  • "A Curated Debate: On Using 'Templates' in Qualitative Research," 2022, Journal of Management Inquiry

Martha S. Feldman has contributed to book publications, notably with Cambridge University Press. One such publication is the "Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics" (2021), which has accumulated a significant number of citations within academic literature.

Best Publications

  • Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change

    Martha S. Feldman;Brian T. Pentland

  • Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change

    Martha S. Feldman

  • Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol.

    Martha S. Feldman;James G. March

  • Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory

    Martha S. Feldman;Wanda J. Orlikowski

  • The uniqueness paradox in organizational stories.

    Joanne Martin;Martha S. Feldman;Mary Jo Hatch;Sim B. Sitkin

  • Organizational routines as a unit of analysis

    Brian T. Pentland;Martha S. Feldman

  • Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture

    W. Lance Bennett;Martha S. Feldman

  • Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data

    Martha S. Feldman

  • Order Without Design: Information Production and Policy Making

    Martha S Feldman

  • Organizational Routines as Sources of Connections and Understandings

    Martha S. Feldman;Anat Rafaeli

  • Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action

    Brian T. Pentland;Martha S. Feldman

  • Routines as a Source of Change in Organizational Schemata: The Role of Trial-and-Error Learning

    Claus Rerup;Martha S. Feldman

  • Making Sense of Stories: A Rhetorical Approach to Narrative Analysis

    Martha S. Feldman;Kaj Sköldberg;Ruth Nicole Brown;Debra Horner

  • Resources in Emerging Structures and Processes of Change

    Martha S. Feldman

  • Perspective—Making Doubt Generative: Rethinking the Role of Doubt in the Research Process

    Karen Locke;Karen Golden-Biddle;Martha S. Feldman

  • Dynamics of Organizational Routines: A Generative Model

    Brian T. Pentland;Martha S. Feldman;Markus C. Becker;Peng Liu

  • Gaining Access: A Practical and Theoretical Guide for Qualitative Researchers

    Martha S. Feldman;Jeannine Bell;Michele Tracy Berger

  • A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines

    Martha S. Feldman

  • Making Doubt Generative: Rethinking the Role of Doubt in the Research Process

    Karen Locke;Karen Golden-Biddle;Martha S. Feldman

  • Narrative Networks: Patterns of Technology and Organization

    Brian T. Pentland;Martha S. Feldman

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian T. Pentland
Brian T. Pentland Michigan State University
W. Lance Bennett
W. Lance Bennett University of Washington
Paula Jarzabkowski
Paula Jarzabkowski University of Queensland
Anat Rafaeli
Anat Rafaeli Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Michael G. Pratt
Michael G. Pratt Boston College
Sim B. Sitkin
Sim B. Sitkin Duke University
Mary Jo Hatch
Mary Jo Hatch University of Virginia
Peter Evans
Peter Evans University of California, Berkeley
David Seidl
David Seidl University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees is a smart way to advance your business and management career while balancing professional or personal responsibilities. Flexible, affordable, and accessible options can help you specialize in key fields that are in demand in today’s job market.

For those interested in focusing on the construction sector, pursuing an online construction management masters can lead to leadership roles in project planning and oversight. If you are seeking top executive roles or want to accelerate your career, look into the benefits of an emba online to gain strategic business skills and expand your professional network.

Cost is an important consideration for many learners. There are numerous cheapest online masters programs that offer excellent value without sacrificing quality. For those looking to thrive in data-driven industries, enrolling in one of the best data science programs can open doors to high-paying analytics and tech careers.

Choosing the right online degree can transform your career prospects and allow you to upskill on your schedule. Consider which pathway matches your interests and goals in business and management.

Best Scientists Citing Martha S. Feldman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles