World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
11301
World Ranking
5689
National Ranking
2069

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
47
Citations
11301
World Ranking
18596
National Ranking
7602

Jill L. Bubier publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill L. Bubier sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 98 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jill L. Bubier D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill L. Bubier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jill L. Bubier is a researcher affiliated with Mount Holyoke College in the United States. Their academic focus spans several areas within environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences.

Their research prominently addresses topics related to peatlands and wetlands ecology, with extended interests in fire effects on ecosystems, coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics, botany and plant ecology studies, forest ecology and biodiversity studies, aquatic ecosystems and phytoplankton dynamics, and constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment.

Major fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Subfields of study feature:

  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Plant Science
  • Insect Science
  • Environmental Chemistry

Their frequent publication venues are:

  • Nature Climate Change
  • New Phytologist
  • Global Change Biology
  • Fundamental and Applied Limnology / Archiv für Hydrobiologie

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jill L. Bubier include:

  • Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink, 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi mediate the response of ombrotrophic peatlands to fertilization: a modeling study, 2022, New Phytologist
  • Author Correction: Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink, 2021, Nature Climate Change
  • Peatland Fungal Community Responses to Nutrient Enrichment: A Story Beyond Nitrogen, 2024, Global Change Biology
  • Nutrient addition increases rotifer abundance and diversity in a temperate bog, 2020, Fundamental and Applied Limnology / Archiv für Hydrobiologie

Jill L. Bubier collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Tim R. Moore
  • Sari Juutinen
  • Tuula Larmola
  • Jianghua Wu
  • Julie Loisel

Best Publications

  • Contemporary carbon balance and late Holocene carbon accumulation in a northern peatland

    Nigel T. Roulet;Peter M. Lafleur;Pierre J. H. Richard;Pierre J. H. Richard;Tim R. Moore

  • A synthesis of methane emissions from 71 northern, temperate, and subtropical wetlands

    Merritt R. Turetsky;Agnieszka Kotowska;Jill Bubier;Nancy B. Dise

  • Plant biomass and production and CO2 exchange in an ombrotrophic bog

    Tim R. Moore;Jill L. Bubier;Steve E. Frolking;Peter M. Lafleur

  • Interannual variability in the peatland-atmosphere carbon dioxide exchange at an ombrotrophic bog

    Peter M. Lafleur;Nigel T. Roulet;Jill L. Bubier;Steve Frolking

  • Controls on CH4 emissions from a northern peatland

    L. M. Bellisario;J. L. Bubier;T. R. Moore;J. P. Chanton

  • Northern fens: methane flux and climatic change

    Nigel Roulet;Tim Moore;Jill Bubier;Peter Lafleur

  • Ecological controls on methane emissions from a Northern Peatland Complex in the zone of discontinuous permafrost, Manitoba, Canada

    Jill L. Bubier;Tim R. Moore;Lianne Bellisario;Neil T. Comer

  • Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink

    J. Loisel;A. V. Gallego-Sala;Matthew J. Amesbury;Matthew J. Amesbury;G. Magnan

  • Spatial and Temporal Variability in Growing-Season Net Ecosystem Carbon Dioxide Exchange at a Large Peatland in Ontario, Canada

    Jill L. Bubier;Gaytri Bhatia;Tim R. Moore;Nigel T. Roulet

  • The relationship of vegetation to methane emission and hydrochemical gradients in northern peatlands.

    Jill L. Bubier

  • Effects of nutrient addition on vegetation and carbon cycling in an ombrotrophic bog

    Jill L. Bubier;Tim R. Moore;Leszek A. Bledzki

  • METHANE EMISSIONS FROM WETLANDS IN THE MIDBOREAL REGION OF NORTHERN ONTARIO, CANADA'

    J. L. Bubier;T. R. Moore;N. T. Roulet

  • A new model of Holocene peatland net primary production, decomposition, water balance, and peat accumulation

    Steve Frolking;Nigel T Roulet;Eeva-Stiina Tuittila;Jill L. Bubier

  • Seasonal patterns and controls on net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a boreal peatland complex

    Jill L. Bubier;Patrick M. Crill;Tim R. Moore;Kathleen Savage

  • Peatland responses to varying interannual moisture conditions as measured by automatic CO2 chambers

    Jill Bubier;Patrick Crill;Andrew Mosedale;Steve Frolking

  • Relationship between ecosystem productivity and photosynthetically active radiation for northern peatlands

    S. E. Frolking;J. L. Bubier;T. R. Moore;T. Ball

  • Litter Decomposition in Temperate Peatland Ecosystems: The Effect of Substrate and Site

    Tim R. Moore;Jill L. Bubier;Leszek Bledzki

  • Modeling seasonal to annual carbon balance of Mer Bleue Bog, Ontario, Canada

    Steve Frolking;Nigel T. Roulet;Tim R. Moore;Peter M. Lafleur

  • An ecological perspective on methane emissions from northern wetlands

    Jill L. Bubier;Tim R. Moore

  • Microtopography and methane flux in boreal peatlands, northern Ontario, Canada

    J. Bubier;A. Costello;T. R. Moore;N. T. Roulet

  • Biogenic trace gases: Measuring emissions from soil and water: edited by P.A. Matson and R. C. Harriss Blackwell Science, Methods in Ecology, 1995. £26.50 pbk (xi + 394 pages) ISBN 0 632 036419

    Jill L. Bubier;Tim R. Moore

Frequent Co-Authors

Tim R. Moore
Tim R. Moore McGill University
Patrick M. Crill
Patrick M. Crill Stockholm University
Steve Frolking
Steve Frolking University of New Hampshire
Sari Juutinen
Sari Juutinen University of Helsinki
Nigel T. Roulet
Nigel T. Roulet McGill University
Peter M. Lafleur
Peter M. Lafleur Trent University
Elyn R. Humphreys
Elyn R. Humphreys Carleton University
Christian Blodau
Christian Blodau University of Münster
Eeva-Stiina Tuittila
Eeva-Stiina Tuittila University of Eastern Finland
Luca Bragazza
Luca Bragazza Agroscope

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Environmental Sciences is a diverse field that intersects with various disciplines, offering multiple pathways for students and professionals alike. For those intrigued by Earth's structure and processes, pursuing a geology online degree can provide essential knowledge about natural resources, environmental hazards, and sustainable land management.

Another rapidly growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which uses spatial data analysis to address environmental challenges. Students interested in advanced studies can explore top programs through the top gis masters programs to gain expertise in mapping, remote sensing, and data-driven decision making.

For those looking to influence environmental policy and public administration, enrolling in one of the top online mpa programs can equip them with leadership and management skills essential for government or nonprofit sectors focused on sustainability initiatives.

Understanding human behavior and social systems is also crucial in environmental work. Degrees like an online sociology bachelor program deepen insight into community dynamics, social impact, and environmental justice, which are fundamental in crafting effective solutions. Check out the online sociology bachelor programs for flexible educational options.

Best Scientists Citing Jill L. Bubier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles