World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
31
Citations
3534
World Ranking
9661
National Ranking
35

J. Wanner publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Wanner sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 74 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

J. Wanner D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Wanner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1966 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

J. Wanner is affiliated with the University of Chemistry and Technology in the Czech Republic and specializes in Environmental Science. Their work largely focuses on the intersection of wastewater treatment, microbial ecology, and environmental impacts of contaminants.

Their research spans multiple specific areas, including:

  • Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
  • Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

J. Wanner has contributed to various subfields within Environmental Science, such as:

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Pollution
  • Ecology
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

The scientist has published multiple research articles in well-known venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Water Science & Technology (4 publications)
  • Nature Communications (2 publications)
  • Water (2 publications)
  • The Science of The Total Environment (1 publication)
  • Water Research (1 publication)

Notable recent papers by J. Wanner include:

  • "The development in biological wastewater treatment over the last 50 years" (2021, Water Science & Technology)
  • "Monitoring and Ecotoxicity Assessment of Emerging Contaminants in Wastewater Discharge in the City of Prague (Czech Republic)" (2020, Water)
  • "Monitoring COVID-19 spread in Prague local neighborhoods based on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater collected throughout the sewer network" (2022, Water Research)

Their collaborative work includes frequent co-authors such as Iveta Růžičková, Solomon Ofori, Per Halkjær Nielsen, Petr Sýkora, and Jana Říhová Ambrožová. These collaborations have supported research on microbial communities in wastewater and environmental monitoring.

Among the distinctions associated with J. Wanner is having been named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1966.

Best Publications

  • Treated wastewater reuse for irrigation: Pros and cons

    Unknown

  • The role and significance of extracellular polymers in activated sludge. Part I: Literature review

    Anna Raszka;Monika Chorvatova;Jiri Wanner

  • On the Occurrence of Anoxic Microniches, Denitrification, and Sulfate Reduction in Aerated Activated Sludge

    Andreas Schramm;Cecilia M. Santegoeds;Helle K. Nielsen;Helle Ploug

  • Anoxic phosphate uptake in the dephanox process

    G. Bortone;S. Marsili Libelli;A. Tilche;J. Wanner

  • Phosphate uptake under anoxic conditions and fixed-film nitrification in nutrient removal activated sludge system

    R. S̆orm;G. Bortone;R. Saltarelli;P. Jeníc̆ek

  • Biological anoxic phosphorus removal - the dephanox process

    G. Bortone;R. Saltarelli;V. Alonso;R. Sorm

  • Identification of filamentous microorganisms from activated sludge: a compromise between wishes, needs and possibilities

    J. Wanner;P. Grau

  • New Process Design for Biological Nutrient Removal

    J. Wanner;J. S. Čech;M. Kos

  • Comparison of denitrification at low temperature using encapsulated Paracoccus denitrificans, Pseudomonas fluorescens and mixed culture

    Unknown

  • Activated sludge process combined with biofilm cultivation

    J. Wanner;K. Kucman;P. Grau

  • Ecophysiology of mycolic acid‐containing Actinobacteria (Mycolata) in activated sludge foams

    Caroline Kragelund;Zaneta Remesova;Jeppe Lund Nielsen;Trine Rolighed Thomsen

  • The impact of different operating conditions on membrane fouling and EPS production

    Unknown

  • A national survey of activated sludge separation problems in the Czech Republic: filaments, floc characteristics and activated sludge metabolic properties

    Jirí Wanner;Iveta Ruzicková;Petra Jetmarová;Olga Krhutková

  • Estimation of maximum specific growth rate of heterotrophic and autotrophic biomass: a combined technique of mathematical modelling and batch cultivations

    Libor Novák;Luis Larrea;Jiri Wanner

  • MiDAS 4: A global catalogue of full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences and taxonomy for studies of bacterial communities in wastewater treatment plants

    Dueholm Ms;Nierychlo M;Andersen Ks;Joergensen Vr

  • Defluvicoccus vanus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel Gram-negative coccus/coccobacillus in the 'Alphaproteobacteria' from activated sludge.

    A. M. Maszenan;R. J. Seviour;Bharat Kumar Patel;P. H. Janssen

  • Amount and nature of soluble refractory organics produced by activated sludge micro-organisms in sequencing batch and continuous flow reactors

    M. Pribyl;F. Tucek;P. A. Wilderer;J. Wanner

  • Nitrification performance in a membrane bioreactor treating industrial wastewater.

    Lukáš Dvořák;Jan Svojitka;Jiří Wanner;Thomas Wintgens

  • In situ Denitrification of Drinking Water

    Unknown

  • Monitoring and Ecotoxicity Assessment of Emerging Contaminants in Wastewater Discharge in the City of Prague (Czech Republic)

    Veronica R. Diaz-Sosa;Mireya Tapia-Salazar;Jiri Wanner;Diana L. Cardenas-Chavez

  • Non-filamentous activated sludge bulking in a laboratory scale system

    L. Novák;L. Larrea;J. Wanner;J.L. Garcia-Heras

  • Filamentous Bulking in Nutrient Removal Activated Sludge Systems

    Jiri Wanner;Petr Grau

  • Verification of anoxic phosphate uptake as the main biochemical mechanism of the “dephanox” process

    R. Sorm;J. Wanner;R. Saltarelli;G. Bortone

  • Effect of anaerobic conditions on activated sludge filamentous bulking in laboratory systems

    J. Wanner;K. Kucman;V. Ottová;P. Grau

  • Microbial evaluation of activated sludge and filamentous population at eight Czech nutrient removal activated sludge plants during year 2000.

    O. Krhutková;I. Ruzicková;J. Wanner

  • In situ bioaugmentation of nitrification in the regeneration zone: practical application and experiences at full-scale plants

    O. Krhutková;L. Novák;L. Pachmanová;A. Benáková

  • The Implementation of Bulking Control in the Design of Activated Sludge Systems

    Jiri Wanner

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Seviour
Robert J. Seviour La Trobe University
Bharat K. C. Patel
Bharat K. C. Patel Griffith University
Per Halkjær Nielsen
Per Halkjær Nielsen Aalborg University
Michael Wagner
Michael Wagner University of Vienna
Jeppe Lund Nielsen
Jeppe Lund Nielsen Aalborg University
Rudolf Amann
Rudolf Amann Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology
Helle Ploug
Helle Ploug University of Gothenburg
Dirk de Beer
Dirk de Beer Max Planck Society
Andreas Schramm
Andreas Schramm Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences can open the door to diverse career opportunities. For professionals seeking advanced roles, exploring best online eds to edd programs can provide leadership skills essential for policy development and education in environmental fields.

Those interested in social aspects related to environmental issues may consider online dsw programs in social work. These programs prepare graduates to address community welfare and sustainability challenges through social work practices.

For students looking to tailor their studies, best affordable online general studies degree programs offer flexibility, allowing a combination of environmental topics with complementary disciplines. This versatility is valuable for multidisciplinary career paths.

Additionally, individuals seeking a straightforward entry into higher education may find several easy bachelor's degree options. These degree programs can help students efficiently gain foundational knowledge while preparing for more specialized environmental studies or related careers.

Best Scientists Citing J. Wanner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles