World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthias L. Schroeter

Matthias L. Schroeter

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
77
Citations
16165
World Ranking
1878
National Ranking
171

Matthias L. Schroeter publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias L. Schroeter sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 400 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Matthias L. Schroeter D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias L. Schroeter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthias L. Schroeter is affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and neuroscience. Their work primarily spans the fields of cognitive neuroscience, neurology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, psychiatry and mental health, and physiology.

The scientist's research topics include functional brain connectivity studies, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, dementia and cognitive impairment research, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments, advanced MRI techniques and applications, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis research.

Matthias L. Schroeter has published in a variety of scientific venues where they have a frequent presence. These publication venues include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Schroeter include:

  • Arno Villringer
  • Henryk Barthel
  • Johannes Levin
  • Markus Otto
  • Osama Sabri

Key recent publications demonstrate Schroeter's involvement in neuroimaging and neurological disorder research. Selected papers include:

  • Assessment of 18F-PI-2620 as a Biomarker in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (2020), JAMA Neurology
  • Neuroimaging the consciousness of self: Review, and conceptual-methodological framework (2020), Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Common Genetic Variation Indicates Separate Causes for Periventricular and Deep White Matter Hyperintensities (2020), Stroke
  • The neuroscience of social feelings: mechanisms of adaptive social functioning (2021), Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Tau deposition patterns are associated with functional connectivity in primary tauopathies (2022), Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • BDNF as a biomarker for successful treatment of mood disorders: a systematic & quantitative meta-analysis.

    Maryna Polyakova;Maryna Polyakova;Katharina Stuke;Katharina Schuemberg;Karsten Mueller

  • Mapping the depressed brain: A meta-analysis of structural and functional alterations in major depressive disorder

    Julia Sacher;Julia Sacher;Jane Neumann;Jane Neumann;Tillmann Fünfstück;Alexandra Soliman

  • Neural correlates of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic and quantitative meta-analysis involving 1351 patients

    Matthias L. Schroeter;Timo Stein;Timo Stein;Nina Maslowski;Jane Neumann

  • The LIFE-Adult-Study: objectives and design of a population-based cohort study with 10,000 deeply phenotyped adults in Germany

    Markus Loeffler;Christoph Engel;Peter Ahnert;Dorothee Alfermann

  • Near-infrared spectroscopy can detect brain activity during a color-word matching Stroop task in an event-related design.

    Matthias L. Schroeter;Stefan Zysset;Thomas Kupka;Frithjof Kruggel

  • Prefrontal activation due to Stroop interference increases during development—an event-related fNIRS study

    Matthias L. Schroeter;Stefan Zysset;Margarethe M. Wahl;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Age dependency of the hemodynamic response as measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy

    Matthias L Schroeter;Stefan Zysset;Frithjof Kruggel;D.Yves von Cramon

  • Genetic architecture of subcortical brain structures in 38,851 individuals

    Claudia L. Satizabal;Claudia L. Satizabal;Claudia L. Satizabal;Hieab H.H. Adams;Derrek Hibar;Charles C. White;Charles C. White

  • Towards a standard analysis for functional near-infrared imaging.

    Matthias L Schroeter;Markus M Bücheler;Karsten Müller;Kâmil Uludağ;Kâmil Uludağ

  • Assessment of 18F-PI-2620 as a Biomarker in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.

    Matthias Brendel;Henryk Barthel;Thilo van Eimeren;Thilo van Eimeren;Ken Marek

  • Age correction in dementia – Matching to a healthy brain

    Juergen Dukart;Juergen Dukart;Matthias L. Schroeter;Matthias L. Schroeter;Karsten Mueller

  • Neural networks in frontotemporal dementia--a meta-analysis.

    Matthias L. Schroeter;Karolina Raczka;Jane Neumann;D. Yves von Cramon

  • S100B protein in neurodegenerative disorders.

    Johann Steiner;Bernhard Bogerts;Matthias L. Schroeter;Hans-Gert Bernstein

  • Towards a nosology for frontotemporal lobar degenerations-a meta-analysis involving 267 subjects.

    Matthias L. Schroeter;Karolina Raczka;Jane Neumann;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Combined evaluation of FDG-PET and MRI improves detection and differentiation of dementia

    Juergen Dukart;Karsten Mueller;Annette Horstmann;Henryk Barthel

  • Visceral obesity relates to deep white matter hyperintensities via inflammation.

    Leonie Lampe;Rui Zhang;Frauke Beyer;Sebastian Huhn

  • Serum markers support disease-specific glial pathology in major depression

    Matthias L. Schroeter;Hashim Abdul-Khaliq;Michael Krebs;Albert Diefenbacher

  • Investigating Structural Brain Changes of Dehydration Using Voxel-Based Morphometry

    Daniel Paolo Streitbürger;Harald E. Möller;Marc Tittgemeyer;Margret Hund-Georgiadis

  • Lesion location matters: The relationships between white matter hyperintensities on cognition in the healthy elderly.

    Leonie Lampe;Shahrzad Kharabian-Masouleh;Jana Kynast;Katrin Arelin

  • Neuroimaging the consciousness of self: Review, and conceptual-methodological framework.

    Paul Frewen;Matthias L. Schroeter;Giuseppe Riva;Pietro Cipresso

  • Prevalence of minor depression in elderly persons with and without mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review

    Maryna Polyakova;Maryna Polyakova;N. Sonnabend;C. Sander;R. Mergl

  • S100B is increased in mood disorders and may be reduced by antidepressive treatment

    Matthias L. Schroeter;CA Hashim Abdul-Khaliq;Albert Diefenbacher;Ingolf E. Blasig

  • Age correction in dementia - Matching to a healthy brain

    Jürgen Dukart;Matthias L. Schroeter;Karsten Mueller

Frequent Co-Authors

Arno Villringer
Arno Villringer Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Karsten Mueller
Karsten Mueller Max Planck Society
Annette Horstmann
Annette Horstmann University of Helsinki
Jane Neumann
Jane Neumann Max Planck Society
Henryk Barthel
Henryk Barthel Leipzig University
Robert Jech
Robert Jech Czech Education and Scientific Net work
Juergen Dukart
Juergen Dukart Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
A. Veronica Witte
A. Veronica Witte Max Planck Society
Steffi G. Riedel-Heller
Steffi G. Riedel-Heller Leipzig University
Johann Steiner
Johann Steiner Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in neuroscience but want to explore additional or complementary career paths, a range of related online degree programs are available. Many students pursue psychology or counseling to deepen their understanding of the brain, behavior, and mental health.

For those seeking a rapid entry into clinical roles, one year msw programs offer a fast-paced route to a Master of Social Work degree and social service licensure. Similarly, earning a 2-year psychology degree online provides foundational knowledge for careers in mental health, research, or further graduate study.

Aspiring counselors should consider cacrep-accredited programs, which are recognized for meeting industry standards and are essential for licensure in many states. Budget-conscious students can also explore the cheapest counseling degree online options without sacrificing quality or accreditation—a critical step for professional advancement.

Whether you’re planning for a clinical, research, or advisory role, these pathways can help you build the expertise to succeed in fields that are closely connected to neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias L. Schroeter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles