World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 47 4372 4217 343 335 124 10458

Mathew A. Vanderklift publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mathew A. Vanderklift between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mathew A. Vanderklift published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2019. 8 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2019. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 7 publications
1996 2025

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mathew A. Vanderklift: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 2
1999 2
2000 5
2001 0
2002 4
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 6
2008 6
2009 3
2010 3
2011 6
2012 8
2013 8
2014 5
2015 3
2016 3
2017 8
2018 2
2019 12
2020 12
2021 7
2022 7
2023 7
2024 1
2025 7
Total 135
Download as CSV

Mathew A. Vanderklift publications per year - data summary

  • Mathew A. Vanderklift, a Ecology and Evolution scholar from Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, has 135 publications recorded across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1996 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2019 and 2020, with 12 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1996, 2004, 2005 and 2024, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 30 years in the span carry no publications at all (1997 and 2001).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.8 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 29 publications, 21% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1996-2005: 18 publications (1.8 per year); 2006-2015: 51 publications (5.1 per year); 2016-2025: 66 publications (6.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mathew A. Vanderklift publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew A. Vanderklift sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 122–126 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287 124
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Mathew A. Vanderklift publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 8,381 Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 37–41 to 531+ publications.
  • Mathew A. Vanderklift, a Ecology and Evolution scholar from Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, records 124 publications - the 35th percentile of the discipline.
  • 35% of ranked Ecology and Evolution scientists score the same or lower than Mathew A. Vanderklift, and about 65% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 147–151 publications range, and Mathew A. Vanderklift ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 97–101 publications, holding 333 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 58% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 157–161 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 531 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Mathew A. Vanderklift D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew A. Vanderklift sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213 47
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Mathew A. Vanderklift D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 8,381 Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 92 ranges running from 30 to 121+ D-Index.
  • Mathew A. Vanderklift, a Ecology and Evolution scholar from Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, records 47 D-Index - the 49th percentile of the discipline.
  • 49% of ranked Ecology and Evolution scientists score the same or lower than Mathew A. Vanderklift, and about 51% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48 D-Index range, and Mathew A. Vanderklift ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 40 D-Index, holding 280 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 60% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 52 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Mathew A. Vanderklift is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with notable focus on subfields including Ecology, Oceanography, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's work frequently addresses topics related to marine and coastal ecosystems. Key topics in their research include:

  • Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Turtle Biology and Conservation
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Coastal and Marine Management
  • Ichthyology and Marine Biology

Mathew A. Vanderklift has contributed to several research papers, some of which are notable for their subject matter and publication venues:

  • Using Propagules to Restore Coastal Marine Ecosystems, 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Bright Spots in Coastal Marine Ecosystem Restoration, 2020, Current Biology
  • Impacts of Climate Change on Marine Foundation Species, 2023, Annual Review of Marine Science
  • Positive Ecological Interactions and the Success of Seagrass Restoration, 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation using macroalgae: a state of knowledge review, 2023, Biological Reviews/Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

The scientist frequently publishes in these venues:

  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Marine Environmental Research
  • Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
  • Marine Biology
  • Current Biology

Mathew A. Vanderklift collaborates with a range of co-authors, including:

  • Richard D. Pillans
  • Anton D. Tucker
  • Russell C. Babcock
  • Daniel Gorman
  • Brian R. Silliman

Best Publications

  • Sources of variation in consumer-diet δ15N enrichment: a meta-analysis

    Mathew A. Vanderklift;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Sergine Ponsard

  • Climate-driven regime shift of a temperate marine ecosystem

    Thomas Wernberg;Scott Bennett;Scott Bennett;Russell C. Babcock;Russell C. Babcock;Thibaut de Bettignies

  • Global patterns in the impact of marine herbivores on benthic primary producers.

    Alistair G. B. Poore;Alexandra H. Campbell;Ross A. Coleman;Graham J. Edgar

  • SELECTING MARINE RESERVES USING HABITATS AND SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AS SURROGATES FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

    T. J. Ward;M. A. Vanderklift;A. O. Nicholls;R. A. Kenchington

  • Mechanistic interpretation of carbon isotope discrimination by marine macroalgae and seagrasses.

    John A. Raven;Andrew M. Johnston;Janet E. Kübler;Rebecca Korb

  • Mechanisms and ecological role of carbon transfer within coastal seascapes

    Glenn A. Hyndes;Ivan Nagelkerken;Ivan Nagelkerken;Rebecca J. McLeod;Rod Martin Connolly

  • Marine macrophytes directly enhance abundances of sandy beach fauna through provision of food and habitat

    Rebecca Ince;Glenn A. Hyndes;Paul S. Lavery;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Mathew A. Vanderklift

  • Severe Continental-Scale Impacts of Climate Change Are Happening Now: Extreme Climate Events Impact Marine Habitat Forming Communities Along 45% of Australia’s Coast

    Russell C. Babcock;Russell C. Babcock;Rodrigo H. Bustamante;Elizabeth A. Fulton;Derek J. Fulton

  • Bright Spots in Coastal Marine Ecosystem Restoration.

    Megan I. Saunders;Megan I. Saunders;Megan I. Saunders;Christopher Doropoulos;Elisa Bayraktarov;Elisa Bayraktarov;Elisa Bayraktarov;Russell C. Babcock

  • Accelerating tropicalization and the transformation of temperate seagrass meadows

    Glenn A. Hyndes;Kenneth L. Heck;Adriana Vergés;Euan S. Harvey

  • Constraints and opportunities for market-based finance for the restoration and protection of blue carbon ecosystems

    Mathew A. Vanderklift;Raymundo Marcos-Martinez;Raymundo Marcos-Martinez;James R.A. Butler;Michael Coleman

  • Positive ecological interactions and the success of seagrass restoration

    Stephanie R. Valdez;Y. Stacy Zhang;Tjisse van der Heide;Tjisse van der Heide;Mathew A. Vanderklift

  • Detached kelps from distant sources are a food subsidy for sea urchins

    Mathew A. Vanderklift;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Thomas Wernberg

  • Export of detached macroalgae from reefs to adjacent seagrass beds

    Thomas Wernberg;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Jason How;Paul S. Lavery

  • Carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation using macroalgae: a state of knowledge review

    Unknown

  • A Meta-Analysis of Seaweed Impacts on Seagrasses: Generalities and Knowledge Gaps

    Mads S. Thomsen;Mads S. Thomsen;Thomas Wernberg;Thomas Wernberg;Thomas Wernberg;Aschwin H. Engelen;Fernando Tuya;Fernando Tuya

  • Spatial Patterns in Herbivory on a Coral Reef Are Influenced by Structural Complexity but Not by Algal Traits

    Adriana Vergés;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Christopher Doropoulos;Glenn A. Hyndes

  • Biology and Ecology of the Globally Significant Kelp Ecklonia radiata

    Thomas Wernberg;Melinda A. Coleman;Russell C. Babcock;Sahira Y. Bell

  • Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus storage in subtropical seagrass meadows: examples from Florida Bay and Shark Bay

    James W. Fourqurean;Gary A. Kendrick;Laurel S. Collins;Randolph M. Chambers

  • Effect of reducing taxonomic resolution on ordinations to detect pollution-induced gradients in macrobenthic infaunal assemblages

    Vanderklift Ma;Ward Tj;Jacoby Ca

  • Use of assemblages derived from different taxonomic levels to select areas for conserving marine biodiversity

    M.A Vanderklift;T.J Ward;J.C Phillips

  • Seaweeds in cold seas: evolution and carbon acquisition.

    John A. Raven;Andrew M. Johnston;Andrew M. Johnston;Janet E. Kübler;Janet E. Kübler;Rebecca Korb;Rebecca Korb

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Wernberg
Thomas Wernberg University of Western Australia
Russell C. Babcock
Russell C. Babcock Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Paul S. Lavery
Paul S. Lavery Edith Cowan University
Gary A. Kendrick
Gary A. Kendrick University of Western Australia
Glenn A. Hyndes
Glenn A. Hyndes Edith Cowan University
Shaun K. Wilson
Shaun K. Wilson Australian Institute of Marine Science
Christopher Doropoulos
Christopher Doropoulos Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Adriana Vergés
Adriana Vergés University of New South Wales
Mads S. Thomsen
Mads S. Thomsen University of Canterbury
Diana Walker
Diana Walker University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students interested in Ecology and Evolution also explore online degrees in related fields. Online programs offer flexible options for learners from diverse backgrounds, including working professionals and military personnel. It’s important to compare different universities and program formats to find the best fit for your goals.

For healthcare professionals, examining options like capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn can help you weigh the strengths and approaches of well-known online nursing programs. Those planning to advance further may also consider accredited rn to msn bridge programs that streamline the path from a bachelor’s to a master’s degree.

When choosing an online college, it’s crucial to look at factors such as accreditation and institutional reputation. Many students prefer enrolling in not for profit online colleges to ensure educational quality and long-term value. Additionally, for those with military experience, military friendly online colleges offer valuable resources and support networks tailored to the unique needs of service members and veterans.

Best Scientists Citing Mathew A. Vanderklift

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles