World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
47
Citations
10458
World Ranking
4372
National Ranking
343

Mathew A. Vanderklift publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew A. Vanderklift sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mathew A. Vanderklift D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew A. Vanderklift sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mathew A. Vanderklift is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with notable focus on subfields including Ecology, Oceanography, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's work frequently addresses topics related to marine and coastal ecosystems. Key topics in their research include:

  • Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Turtle Biology and Conservation
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Coastal and Marine Management
  • Ichthyology and Marine Biology

Mathew A. Vanderklift has contributed to several research papers, some of which are notable for their subject matter and publication venues:

  • Using Propagules to Restore Coastal Marine Ecosystems, 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Bright Spots in Coastal Marine Ecosystem Restoration, 2020, Current Biology
  • Impacts of Climate Change on Marine Foundation Species, 2023, Annual Review of Marine Science
  • Positive Ecological Interactions and the Success of Seagrass Restoration, 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation using macroalgae: a state of knowledge review, 2023, Biological Reviews/Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

The scientist frequently publishes in these venues:

  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Marine Environmental Research
  • Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
  • Marine Biology
  • Current Biology

Mathew A. Vanderklift collaborates with a range of co-authors, including:

  • Richard D. Pillans
  • Anton D. Tucker
  • Russell C. Babcock
  • Daniel Gorman
  • Brian R. Silliman

Best Publications

  • Sources of variation in consumer-diet δ15N enrichment: a meta-analysis

    Mathew A. Vanderklift;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Sergine Ponsard

  • Climate-driven regime shift of a temperate marine ecosystem

    Thomas Wernberg;Scott Bennett;Scott Bennett;Russell C. Babcock;Russell C. Babcock;Thibaut de Bettignies

  • Global patterns in the impact of marine herbivores on benthic primary producers.

    Alistair G. B. Poore;Alexandra H. Campbell;Ross A. Coleman;Graham J. Edgar

  • SELECTING MARINE RESERVES USING HABITATS AND SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AS SURROGATES FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

    T. J. Ward;M. A. Vanderklift;A. O. Nicholls;R. A. Kenchington

  • Mechanistic interpretation of carbon isotope discrimination by marine macroalgae and seagrasses.

    John A. Raven;Andrew M. Johnston;Janet E. Kübler;Rebecca Korb

  • Mechanisms and ecological role of carbon transfer within coastal seascapes

    Glenn A. Hyndes;Ivan Nagelkerken;Ivan Nagelkerken;Rebecca J. McLeod;Rod Martin Connolly

  • Marine macrophytes directly enhance abundances of sandy beach fauna through provision of food and habitat

    Rebecca Ince;Glenn A. Hyndes;Paul S. Lavery;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Mathew A. Vanderklift

  • Severe Continental-Scale Impacts of Climate Change Are Happening Now: Extreme Climate Events Impact Marine Habitat Forming Communities Along 45% of Australia’s Coast

    Russell C. Babcock;Russell C. Babcock;Rodrigo H. Bustamante;Elizabeth A. Fulton;Derek J. Fulton

  • Bright Spots in Coastal Marine Ecosystem Restoration.

    Megan I. Saunders;Megan I. Saunders;Megan I. Saunders;Christopher Doropoulos;Elisa Bayraktarov;Elisa Bayraktarov;Elisa Bayraktarov;Russell C. Babcock

  • Accelerating tropicalization and the transformation of temperate seagrass meadows

    Glenn A. Hyndes;Kenneth L. Heck;Adriana Vergés;Euan S. Harvey

  • Constraints and opportunities for market-based finance for the restoration and protection of blue carbon ecosystems

    Mathew A. Vanderklift;Raymundo Marcos-Martinez;Raymundo Marcos-Martinez;James R.A. Butler;Michael Coleman

  • Positive ecological interactions and the success of seagrass restoration

    Stephanie R. Valdez;Y. Stacy Zhang;Tjisse van der Heide;Tjisse van der Heide;Mathew A. Vanderklift

  • Detached kelps from distant sources are a food subsidy for sea urchins

    Mathew A. Vanderklift;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Thomas Wernberg

  • Export of detached macroalgae from reefs to adjacent seagrass beds

    Thomas Wernberg;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Jason How;Paul S. Lavery

  • Carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation using macroalgae: a state of knowledge review

    Unknown

  • A Meta-Analysis of Seaweed Impacts on Seagrasses: Generalities and Knowledge Gaps

    Mads S. Thomsen;Mads S. Thomsen;Thomas Wernberg;Thomas Wernberg;Thomas Wernberg;Aschwin H. Engelen;Fernando Tuya;Fernando Tuya

  • Spatial Patterns in Herbivory on a Coral Reef Are Influenced by Structural Complexity but Not by Algal Traits

    Adriana Vergés;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Mathew A. Vanderklift;Christopher Doropoulos;Glenn A. Hyndes

  • Biology and Ecology of the Globally Significant Kelp Ecklonia radiata

    Thomas Wernberg;Melinda A. Coleman;Russell C. Babcock;Sahira Y. Bell

  • Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus storage in subtropical seagrass meadows: examples from Florida Bay and Shark Bay

    James W. Fourqurean;Gary A. Kendrick;Laurel S. Collins;Randolph M. Chambers

  • Effect of reducing taxonomic resolution on ordinations to detect pollution-induced gradients in macrobenthic infaunal assemblages

    Vanderklift Ma;Ward Tj;Jacoby Ca

  • Use of assemblages derived from different taxonomic levels to select areas for conserving marine biodiversity

    M.A Vanderklift;T.J Ward;J.C Phillips

  • Seaweeds in cold seas: evolution and carbon acquisition.

    John A. Raven;Andrew M. Johnston;Andrew M. Johnston;Janet E. Kübler;Janet E. Kübler;Rebecca Korb;Rebecca Korb

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Wernberg
Thomas Wernberg University of Western Australia
Russell C. Babcock
Russell C. Babcock Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Paul S. Lavery
Paul S. Lavery Edith Cowan University
Gary A. Kendrick
Gary A. Kendrick University of Western Australia
Glenn A. Hyndes
Glenn A. Hyndes Edith Cowan University
Shaun K. Wilson
Shaun K. Wilson Australian Institute of Marine Science
Christopher Doropoulos
Christopher Doropoulos Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Adriana Vergés
Adriana Vergés University of New South Wales
Mads S. Thomsen
Mads S. Thomsen University of Canterbury
Diana Walker
Diana Walker University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students interested in Ecology and Evolution also explore online degrees in related fields. Online programs offer flexible options for learners from diverse backgrounds, including working professionals and military personnel. It’s important to compare different universities and program formats to find the best fit for your goals.

For healthcare professionals, examining options like capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn can help you weigh the strengths and approaches of well-known online nursing programs. Those planning to advance further may also consider accredited rn to msn bridge programs that streamline the path from a bachelor’s to a master’s degree.

When choosing an online college, it’s crucial to look at factors such as accreditation and institutional reputation. Many students prefer enrolling in not for profit online colleges to ensure educational quality and long-term value. Additionally, for those with military experience, military friendly online colleges offer valuable resources and support networks tailored to the unique needs of service members and veterans.

Best Scientists Citing Mathew A. Vanderklift

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles