World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
13963
World Ranking
10966
National Ranking
622

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
52
Citations
12592
World Ranking
3564
National Ranking
236

C.F. Forster publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C.F. Forster sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 153 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

C.F. Forster D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C.F. Forster sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

C.F. Forster is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields including psychology and medicine, with a focus on clinical psychology as well as endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, nutrition, dietetics, and biotechnology.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics related to both clinical and nutritional health, reflecting multidisciplinary expertise. These recent papers include:

  • Could mindfulness activity improve occupational health in UK paramedics? (2020), Journal of Paramedic Practice
  • P21 Introduction of standardised parenteral nutrition for use in preterm neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit at a large tertiary hospital (2022), Archives of Disease in Childhood
  • Informative Value of a Sample Investigation with a Predefined Sample Size using the Example of Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (2024), Journal of Food Protection

Their work involves collaboration with several frequent co-authors including Sarah L. Whiteley, Kimberly Mak, Katja Nordhoff, Jörg Fritzemeier, and Fritjof Freise.

C.F. Forster has published in journals such as the Journal of Paramedic Practice, Archives of Disease in Childhood, and Journal of Food Protection, indicating engagement with both clinical and food safety audiences.

Their main research fields can be broken down as follows:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Within these fields, their subfields of study are:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Biotechnology

Themes and topics that frequently appear in Forster's work include:

  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety

Best Publications

  • Study of the Sorption of Divalent Metal Ions on to Peat

    Y.S. Ho;G. McKay;D.A.J. Wase;C.F. Forster

  • The treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent: a review.

    G Thompson;J Swain;M Kay;C.F Forster

  • A comparative study of the nature of biopolymers extracted from anaerobic and activated sludges

    J.W. Morgan;C.F. Forster;L. Evison

  • Kinetic Studies of Competitive Heavy Metal Adsorption by Sphagnum Moss Peat

    Y. S Ho;D.A. J. Wase;C. F. Forster

  • Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure

    F.J. Callaghan;D.A.J. Wase;K. Thayanithy;C.F. Forster

  • Batch nickel removal from aqueous solution by sphagnum moss peat

    Y.S. Ho;D.A. John Wase;C.F. Forster

  • Removal of hexavalent chromium using sphagnum moss peat

    D.C. Sharma;C.F. Forster

  • Heavy metal adsorption properties of a submerged aquatic plant (Ceratophyllum demersum).

    O Keskinkan;M Z L Goksu;M Basibuyuk;C F Forster

  • A preliminary examination into the adsorption of hexavalent chromium using low-cost adsorbents

    D.C. Sharma;C.F. Forster

  • THE USE OF SAGO WASTE FOR THE SORPTION OF LEAD AND COPPER

    S Y Quek;Wase D.A.J.;C F Forster

  • Heavy metal adsorption characteristics of a submerged aquatic plant (Myriophyllum spicatum)

    O. Keskinkan;M.Z.L. Goksu;A. Yuceer;M. Basibuyuk

  • Co-digestion of waste organic solids: batch studies

    F.J. Callaghan;D.A.J. Wase;K. Thayanithy;C.F. Forster

  • Factors which control bulk chlorine decay rates

    James C. Powell;Nicholas B. Hallam;John R. West;Christopher F. Forster

  • The decay of chlorine associated with the pipe wall in water distribution systems

    N.B Hallam;J.R West;C.F Forster;J.C Powell

  • The potential for biofilm growth in water distribution systems

    N.B Hallam;J.R West;C.F Forster;J Simms

  • A preliminary evaluation of turbidity removal by natural coagulants indigenous to Venezuela

    A. Diaz;N. Rincon;A. Escorihuela;N. Fernandez

  • Modelling of chlorine decay in municipal water supplies

    Fang Hua;J.R West;R.A Barker;C.F Forster

  • The treatment of chromium wastewaters using the sorptive potential of leaf mould

    D.C. Sharma;C.F. Forster

  • A further examination into the composition of activated sludge surfaces in relation to their settlement characteristics

    J.A.S. Goodwin;C.F. Forster

  • Removal of lead ions from aqueous solution using sphagnum moss peat as adsorbent

    Y.S. Ho;D.A.J. Wase;C.F. Forster

  • The use of ultrasound and γ-irradiation as pre-treatments for the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures

    S Lafitte-Trouqué;C.F Forster

Frequent Co-Authors

Yuh-Shan Ho
Yuh-Shan Ho Asian University
Siew Young Quek
Siew Young Quek University of Auckland
Geoffrey E. Petts
Geoffrey E. Petts University of Westminster
Angela M. Gurnell
Angela M. Gurnell Queen Mary University of London
Gordon McKay
Gordon McKay Hamad bin Khalifa University
Lynne E. Macaskie
Lynne E. Macaskie University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing C.F. Forster

Recently Published Articles