World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
12035
World Ranking
12025
National Ranking
857

Ingolf E. Blasig publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingolf E. Blasig sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 159 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ingolf E. Blasig D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingolf E. Blasig sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ingolf E. Blasig is affiliated with the Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience, biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, and medicine. Subfields of study include neurology, molecular biology, oncology, physiology, and immunology.

Their work focuses on several main topics including barrier structure and function studies, connexins and lens biology, neurological disease mechanisms and treatments, neurological diseases and metabolism, drug transport and resistance mechanisms, ginger and Zingiberaceae research, as well as the lymphatic system and diseases.

Frequent co-authors in Ingolf E. Blasig's publications include Reiner F. Haseloff, Rosel Blasig, Zhihai Qin, Sophie Dithmer, and Lars Winkler.

Their publications appear in a range of scientific journals, including the Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, Scientific Reports, and the Journal of Controlled Release.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Ingolf E. Blasig are:

  • "Tight junctions in the blood-brain barrier promote edema formation and infarct size in stroke - Ambivalent effects of sealing proteins" (2020) in Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
  • "The Basic Requirement of Tight Junction Proteins in Blood-Brain Barrier Function and Their Role in Pathologies" (2024) in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • "A face-to-face comparison of claudin-5 transduced human brain endothelial (hCMEC/D3) cells with porcine brain endothelial cells as blood-brain barrier models for drug transport studies" (2020) in Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
  • "M01 as a novel drug enhancer for specifically targeting the blood-brain barrier." (2021) in Journal of Controlled Release
  • "Claudin-3 inhibits tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis via regulating the PI3K signaling pathway in lymphatic endothelial cells" (2022) in Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Structure and function of claudins.

    Gerd Krause;Lars Winkler;Sebastian L. Mueller;Reiner F. Haseloff

  • Locally renewing resident synovial macrophages provide a protective barrier for the joint

    Stephan Culemann;Anika Grüneboom;José Ángel Nicolás-Ávila;Daniela Weidner

  • Strategies to advance translational research into brain barriers

    Edward Neuwelt;N Joan Abbott;Lauren Abrey;William A Banks

  • Formation of tight junction: determinants of homophilic interaction between classic claudins

    Jörg Piontek;Lars Winkler;Hartwig Wolburg;Sebastian L. Müller

  • Reactive oxygen species alter brain endothelial tight junction dynamics via RhoA, PI3 kinase, and PKB signaling

    Gerty Schreibelt;Gijs Kooij;Arie Reijerkerk;Ruben van Doorn

  • In search of the astrocytic factor(s) modulating blood-brain barrier functions in brain capillary endothelial cells in vitro

    R F Haseloff;I E Blasig;H C Bauer;H Bauer

  • Transmembrane proteins of the tight junctions at the blood-brain barrier: structural and functional aspects.

    Reiner F. Haseloff;Sophie Dithmer;Lars Winkler;Hartwig Wolburg

  • Peroxynitrite Increases the Degradation of Aconitase and Other Cellular Proteins by Proteasome

    Tilman Grune;Tilman Grune;Ingolf E. Blasig;Nicolle Sitte;Birgit Roloff

  • Protein Kinase C Regulates the Phosphorylation and Cellular Localization of Occludin

    Anna Y. Andreeva;Eberhard Krause;Eva Christina Müller;Ingolf E. Blasig

  • In tight junctions, claudins regulate the interactions between occludin, tricellulin and marvelD3, which, inversely, modulate claudin oligomerization

    Jimmi Cording;Johanna Berg;Nadja Käding;Christian Bellmann

  • The Tight Junction Protein Occludin and the Adherens Junction Protein α-Catenin Share a Common Interaction Mechanism with ZO-1

    Sebastian L. Müller;Michael Portwich;Anke Schmidt;Darkhan I. Utepbergenov

  • Tight junction proteins at the blood–brain barrier: far more than claudin-5

    Philipp Berndt;Lars Winkler;Jimmi Cording;Olga Breitkreuz-Korff

  • Serum markers support disease-specific glial pathology in major depression

    Matthias L. Schroeter;Hashim Abdul-Khaliq;Michael Krebs;Albert Diefenbacher

  • On the self-association potential of transmembrane tight junction proteins

    I. E. Blasig;L. Winkler;B. Lassowski;S. L. Mueller

  • Occludin Protein Family: Oxidative Stress and Reducing Conditions

    Ingolf E. Blasig;Christian Bellmann;Jimmi Cording;Giovanna del Vecchio

  • Tubular Epithelial NF-κB Activity Regulates Ischemic AKI

    Lajos Markó;Emilia Vigolo;Christian Hinze;Joon-Keun Park

  • Molecular determinants of the interaction between Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin fragments and claudin-3.

    Lars Winkler;Claudia Gehring;Ariane Wenzel;Sebastian L. Müller

  • Elucidating the principles of the molecular organization of heteropolymeric tight junction strands

    Jörg Piontek;Susanne Fritzsche;Jimmi Cording;Sandra Richter

  • Participation of the second extracellular loop of claudin-5 in paracellular tightening against ions, small and large molecules

    Christian Piehl;Jörg Piontek;Jimmi Cording;Hartwig Wolburg

  • Structure and function of extracellular claudin domains.

    Gerd Krause;Lars Winkler;Christian Piehl;Ingolf Blasig

Frequent Co-Authors

Hartwig Wolburg
Hartwig Wolburg University of Tübingen
Matthias L. Schroeter
Matthias L. Schroeter Max Planck Society
Tilman Grune
Tilman Grune University of Potsdam
Gerd Krause
Gerd Krause Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Otmar Huber
Otmar Huber Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Péter Ferdinandy
Péter Ferdinandy Semmelweis University
Zhihai Qin
Zhihai Qin Chinese Academy of Sciences
Peter Lange
Peter Lange University of Copenhagen
Michael Fromm
Michael Fromm Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Claudia Sommer
Claudia Sommer University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology or Biochemistry unlocks a range of online degree and career options in the healthcare and life sciences fields. Many students are interested in practical, in-demand career pathways that allow them to leverage their science knowledge outside of a traditional lab setting.

For those considering healthcare administration, pursuing a health information management degree is a great starting point. This online qualification prepares graduates for roles such as medical billers and coders, bridging the gap between clinical staff and insurance systems.

As you explore these roles, it’s helpful to learn about medical coding salary trends, and to ask: is medical coding a good career? These resources can guide you on job stability, working environment, and demand across the healthcare sector.

If you’re drawn to the nutrition side of biology, consider accredited programs such as online degrees in nutrition. These programs offer flexible learning to enter fields like dietetics, wellness coaching, and food safety—diversifying your career options with real-world impact.

Best Scientists Citing Ingolf E. Blasig

Trending Scientists