World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
8974
World Ranking
5545
National Ranking
450

Harry M. Charlton publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harry M. Charlton sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 121 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Harry M. Charlton D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harry M. Charlton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom

Overview

Harry M. Charlton is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. The professional record shows no recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with their academic work.

The fields and subfields of study related to their research are not listed in available data. Similarly, there are no specific main topics of work documented in the sources provided.

There is a record of an award received by Harry M. Charlton. In 1994, they were recognized as a Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom.

No book publications or additional scholarly outputs are noted in the data.

Best Publications

  • Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone deficiency in a mutant mouse with hypogonadism

    B. M. Cattanach;Carol A. Iddon;H. M. Charlton;Sharon A. Chiappa

  • The effect of a null mutation in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene on mouse reproduction.

    Margaret H. Abel;Alison N. Wootton;Vivienne Wilkins;Ilpo Huhtaniemi

  • The fate of allogeneic and xenogeneic neuronal tissue transplanted into the third ventricle of rodents.

    D.W. Mason;H.M. Charlton;A.J. Jones;C.B.D. Lavy

  • The mononuclear phagocyte system of the mouse defined by immunohistochemical localization of antigen F4/80: macrophages of endocrine organs

    David A. Hume;David Halpin;Harry Charlton;Siamon Gordon

  • Brain grafts reverse hypogonadism of gonadotropin releasing hormone deficiency

    D. T. Krieger;M. J. Perlow;M. J. Gibson;T. F. Davies

  • Adenovirus gene transfer causes inflammation in the brain.

    A.P. Byrnes;J.E. Rusby;M.J.A. Wood;H.M. Charlton

  • Fetal Development of Leydig Cell Activity in the Mouse Is Independent of Pituitary Gonadotroph Function

    P. J. O’Shaughnessy;P. Baker;U. Sohnius;A.-M. Haavisto

  • Mating and pregnancy can occur in genetically hypogonadal mice with preoptic area brain grafts

    Marie J. Gibson;Dorothy T. Krieger;Harry M. Charlton;Earl A. Zimmerman

  • Regulation of Sertoli Cell Number and Activity by Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Androgen during Postnatal Development in the Mouse

    Heather Johnston;Paul J. Baker;Margaret Abel;Harry M. Charlton

  • The immune response to intracerebral neural grafts

    D.J. Sloan;M.J. Wood;H.M. Charlton

  • Relaxin-Like Factor Expression as a Marker of Differentiation in the Mouse Testis and Ovary

    M. Balvers;A.-N. Spiess;R. Domagalski;N. Hunt

  • Immune responses to adenovirus vectors in the nervous system

    Matthew J.A. Wood;Harry M. Charlton;Kathryn J. Wood;Koji Kajiwara;Koji Kajiwara

  • Immunological instability of persistent adenovirus vectors in the brain: peripheral exposure to vector leads to renewed inflammation, reduced gene expression, and demyelination.

    Andrew P. Byrnes;Robert E. MacLaren;Harry M. Charlton

  • The effects of daily administration of single and multiple injections of gonadotropin-releasing hormone on pituitary and gonadal function in the hypogonadal (hpg) mouse.

    H. M. Charlton;D. M. G. Halpin;Carol Iddon;Roberta Rosie

  • Spermatogenesis and Sertoli cell activity in mice lacking Sertoli cell receptors for follicle stimulating hormone and androgen

    M. H. Abel;P. J. Baker;H. M. Charlton;A. Monteiro

  • Postnatal ovarian follicle development in hypogonadal (hpg) and normal mice and associated changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary ovarian axis.

    D. M. G. Halpin;A. Jones;G. Fink;H. M. Charlton

  • Failure of Normal Leydig Cell Development in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Receptor-Deficient Mice, But Not FSHβ-Deficient Mice: Role for Constitutive FSH Receptor Activity

    Paul J. Baker;Pirjo Pakarinen;Ilpo T. Huhtaniemi;Margaret H. Abel

  • Role of T cells in inflammation caused by adenovirus vectors in the brain.

    A. P. Byrnes;M. J. A. Wood;H. M. Charlton

  • Inflammatory effects of gene transfer into the CNS with defective HSV-1 vectors.

    M J Wood;A P Byrnes;D W Pfaff;S D Rabkin

  • Angioarchitecture of the CNS, Pituitary Gland, and Intracerebral Grafts Revealed with Peroxidase Cytochemistry

    Richard D. Broadwell;Brian J. Balin;Harry M. Charlton;Michael Salcman

  • Indefinite survival of neural xenografts induced with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies

    M.J.A. Wood;D.J. Sloan;K.J. Wood;H.M. Charlton

  • Immune responses to adenoviral vectors during gene transfer in the brain.

    Koji Kajiwara;Andrew P. Byrnes;Harry M. Charlton;Matthew J. A. Wood

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew J.A. Wood
Matthew J.A. Wood University of Oxford
George Fink
George Fink Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Kathryn J. Wood
Kathryn J. Wood University of Oxford
Ilpo Huhtaniemi
Ilpo Huhtaniemi Imperial College London
Donald W. Pfaff
Donald W. Pfaff Rockefeller University
Margaret J. Dallman
Margaret J. Dallman Imperial College London
Samuel D. Rabkin
Samuel D. Rabkin Harvard University
Lawrence S. Young
Lawrence S. Young University of Warwick
Robert S. Coffin
Robert S. Coffin University College London
Nabeel A. Affara
Nabeel A. Affara University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience in the USA often overlaps with related fields such as psychology, social work, and therapy. Online programs have made these career pathways more accessible and flexible for students everywhere.

Many learners choose a cheap online psychology degree as a starting point for understanding human behavior and the brain. This is often an affordable entry into the broader mental health field.

For those interested in social work, the easiest msw online program can help you launch a career supporting individuals and communities. Social work skills complement neuroscience knowledge, especially in rehabilitation and clinical settings.

If advanced clinical practice is your goal, consider some of the cheapest psyd programs for doctoral-level psychology. These programs prepare graduates for professional licensure and specialized practice.

Those interested in therapy can fast-track their training with online marriage and family therapy programs. These are ideal for students wanting to work with couples and families, a field that often intersects with principles of neuroscience.

Whether pursuing research, therapy, or clinical practice, these online pathways make it easier to build a career in brain and behavioral sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Harry M. Charlton

Recently Published Articles