World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
13502
World Ranking
5880
National Ranking
255

Harold Cremer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold Cremer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 98 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Harold Cremer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold Cremer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Neuron
  • Genetics

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Neuroscience, Neural cell adhesion molecule, Cell biology, Polysialic acid and Rostral migratory stream. His Neuroscience study typically links adjacent topics like Homeobox. His Neural cell adhesion molecule research includes themes of Transfection, Receptor, Virus genetics, Virus and Rabies.

His work in the fields of Cell biology, such as Process and Motile cilium, overlaps with other areas such as Coupling and Basal body. His research in Polysialic acid intersects with topics in Hippocampal formation, Long-term potentiation, Neural development and Synaptic plasticity. His Rostral migratory stream study incorporates themes from Cell migration and Transplantation.

His most cited work include:

  • Inactivation of the N-CAM gene in mice results in size reduction of the olfactory bulb and deficits in spatial learning. (923 citations)
  • The homeobox gene Phox2b is essential for the development of autonomic neural crest derivatives (667 citations)
  • PSA–NCAM Is Required for Activity-Induced Synaptic Plasticity (548 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Neuroscience, Cell biology, Neural cell adhesion molecule, Neurogenesis and Neural stem cell. Many of his research projects under Neuroscience are closely connected to Forebrain with Forebrain, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. His Cell biology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Cell, Endocytosis, Cellular differentiation, Induced pluripotent stem cell and Transplantation.

He combines subjects such as Hippocampal formation, Long-term potentiation, Neural development and Cell adhesion molecule with his study of Neural cell adhesion molecule. His studies deal with areas such as NEUROD1, Neuron, Lateral ventricles, Nervous system and In vivo as well as Neurogenesis. His Neural stem cell research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Progenitor cell, Embryonic stem cell, Dopaminergic and microRNA.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Neuroscience (57.73%)
  • Cell biology (32.99%)
  • Neural cell adhesion molecule (25.77%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Neuroscience (57.73%)
  • Neurogenesis (24.74%)
  • Neural stem cell (23.71%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Neuroscience, Neurogenesis, Neural stem cell, Forebrain and Cell biology. He performs integrative study on Neuroscience and NEUROD2 in his works. His Neurogenesis research incorporates elements of Rostral migratory stream, Interneuron, Cytoskeleton, PAX6 and In vivo.

Harold Cremer works mostly in the field of Interneuron, limiting it down to concerns involving Neuroplasticity and, occasionally, Synaptic plasticity. In general Neural stem cell study, his work on Subventricular zone often relates to the realm of Dicer, thereby connecting several areas of interest. The study incorporates disciplines such as Cell, Cadherin, Cell polarity and Transplantation in addition to Cell biology.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • MicroRNAs in brain development and function: a matter of flexibility and stability (80 citations)
  • A dual role for planar cell polarity genes in ciliated cells (76 citations)
  • Anti-ACSA-2 defines a novel monoclonal antibody for prospective isolation of living neonatal and adult astrocytes (29 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Neuron
  • Genetics

His main research concerns Neuroscience, Neurogenesis, Neural stem cell, Forebrain and Neuron. His Neuroscience research integrates issues from Subventricular zone, Progenitor cell and Flow cytometry. Harold Cremer has researched Neurogenesis in several fields, including Process, Period, In vivo and Mouse Olfactory Bulb.

His research on Neural stem cell also deals with topics like

  • Embryonic stem cell that connect with fields like ZIC2, Dopaminergic and Stem cell,
  • Cell type that intertwine with fields like Long-term potentiation, Function, Nervous system and Synaptogenesis. His study looks at the relationship between Neuron and fields such as Transplantation, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems. His Cell biology study combines topics in areas such as Dentate gyrus, Immunocytochemistry, Immunology and Floor plate.

Best Publications

  • Inactivation of the N-CAM gene in mice results in size reduction of the olfactory bulb and deficits in spatial learning.

    H Cremer;R Lange;A Christoph;M Plomann

  • The homeobox gene Phox2b is essential for the development of autonomic neural crest derivatives

    Alexandre Pattyn;Xavier Morin;Harold Cremer;Christo Goridis

  • PSA–NCAM Is Required for Activity-Induced Synaptic Plasticity

    Dominique Muller;C. Wang;Galina Skibo;Nicolas Toni

  • Importance of newly generated neurons in the adult olfactory bulb for odor discrimination

    Gilles Gheusi;Harold Cremer;Heather McLean;Geneviève Chazal

  • Expression and interactions of the two closely related homeobox genes Phox2a and Phox2b during neurogenesis

    Alexandre Pattyn;Xavier Morin;Harold Cremer;Christo Goridis

  • Defects in Sensory and Autonomic Ganglia and Absence of Locus Coeruleus in Mice Deficient for the Homeobox Gene Phox2a

    Xavier Morin;Harold Cremer;Marie Rose Hirsch;Raj P. Kapur

  • Mice Deficient in the Polysialyltransferase ST8SiaIV/PST-1 Allow Discrimination of the Roles of Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule Protein and Polysialic Acid in Neural Development and Synaptic Plasticity

    Matthias Eckhardt;Olena Bukalo;Geneviève Chazal;Lihua Wang

  • Disruption of the mouse Necdin gene results in hypothalamic and behavioral alterations reminiscent of the human Prader–Willi syndrome

    Françoise Muscatelli;Djoher Nora Abrous;Annick Massacrier;Irène Boccaccio

  • The Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule Is a Receptor for Rabies Virus

    Maria-Isabel Thoulouze;Mireille Lafage;Melitta Schachner;Ursula Hartmann

  • Reelin is a detachment signal in tangential chain-migration during postnatal neurogenesis

    Iris Hack;Mircea Bancila;Karine Loulier;Patrick Carroll

  • NCAM Is Essential for Axonal Growth and Fasciculation in the Hippocampus

    Harold Cremer;Genèvieve Chazal;Christo Goridis;Alfonso Represa

  • Consequences of neural cell adhesion molecule deficiency on cell migration in the rostral migratory stream of the mouse.

    Geneviève Chazal;Pascale Durbec;Aleksandar Jankovski;Geneviève Rougon

  • Dynamics of Cux2 expression suggests that an early pool of SVZ precursors is fated to become upper cortical layer neurons.

    Céline Zimmer;Marie-Catherine Tiveron;Rolf Bodmer;Harold Cremer

  • Molecular Interaction between Projection Neuron Precursors and Invading Interneurons via Stromal-Derived Factor 1 (CXCL12)/CXCR4 Signaling in the Cortical Subventricular Zone/Intermediate Zone

    Marie-Catherine Tiveron;Mireille Rossel;Barbara Moepps;Yong Li Zhang

  • Long-term but not short-term plasticity at mossy fiber synapses is impaired in neural cell adhesion molecule-deficient mice

    Harold Cremer;Geneviève Chazal;Alan Carleton;Christo Goridis

  • Neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) is required for cell type segregation and normal ultrastructure in pancreatic islets.

    Farzad Esni;Inge-Bert Täljedal;Anne-Karina Perl;Harold Cremer

  • Glial conversion of SVZ-derived committed neuronal precursors after ectopic grafting into the adult brain.

    Ralph Seidenfaden;Angélique Desoeuvre;Andreas Bosio;Isabelle Virard

  • Efficient In Vivo Electroporation of the Postnatal Rodent Forebrain

    Camille Boutin;Simone Diestel;Angélique Desoeuvre;Marie-Catherine Tiveron

  • Revisiting the function of PSA-NCAM in the nervous system.

    Pascale Durbec;Harold Cremer

  • NeuroD1 induces terminal neuronal differentiation in olfactory neurogenesis

    Camille Boutin;Olaf Hardt;Antoine de Chevigny;Nathalie Coré

  • Long-term but not short-term plasticity at mossy fiber synapses is impaired in neural cell adhesion molecule-deficient mice (cell adhesion moleculesyfrequency facilitationypaired-pulse facilitationylong-term potentiationyexcitatory synapses)

    Harold Cremer;Alan Carleton;C Hristo Goridis;Jean-Didier Vincent

Frequent Co-Authors

Melitta Schachner
Melitta Schachner Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Christo Goridis
Christo Goridis École Normale Supérieure
Jean-François Brunet
Jean-François Brunet École Normale Supérieure
Geneviève Rougon
Geneviève Rougon Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Alfonso Represa
Alfonso Represa Aix-Marseille University
Pamela L. Mellon
Pamela L. Mellon University of California, San Diego
Alain Chédotal
Alain Chédotal Institut de la Vision
Pascal Barbry
Pascal Barbry Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Henrik Semb
Henrik Semb University of Copenhagen
Philippe Pierre
Philippe Pierre Aix-Marseille University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Harold Cremer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles