World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Graeme P. Young

Graeme P. Young

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
29111
World Ranking
11798
National Ranking
371

Graeme P. Young publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graeme P. Young sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 566 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Graeme P. Young D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graeme P. Young sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Graeme P. Young is affiliated with Flinders University in Australia and has made contributions primarily in the field of medicine, with a strong focus on oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, pathology and forensic medicine, cancer research, and epidemiology. Their work spans 169 publications in medicine, with subfields emphasizing oncology, respiratory conditions, and cancer research.

Their research topics cover areas such as colorectal cancer screening and detection, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, cancer genomics and diagnostics, gastric cancer management and outcomes, ophthalmology and visual impairment studies, corneal surgery and disorders, and epigenetics and DNA methylation.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Graeme P. Young include:

  • Control of myopia using diffusion optics spectacle lenses: 12-month results of a randomised controlled, efficacy and safety study (2022), published in British Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Long-term Effect of Dual-focus Contact Lenses on Myopia Progression in Children: A 6-year Multicenter Clinical Trial (2022), published in Optometry and Vision Science
  • BCLA CLEAR - Effect of contact lens materials and designs on the anatomy and physiology of the eye (2021), published in Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
  • Circulating epigenetic biomarkers for detection of recurrent colorectal cancer (2020), published in Cancer
  • An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles (2023), published in Gut

Frequent collaborators include Erin L. Symonds, Jean M. Winter, Charles Cock, Susanne K. Pedersen, and Molla Mesele Wassie.

The scientist's work has appeared frequently in several publication venues, including:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Digestive Diseases and Sciences
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention

Best Publications

  • Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia.

    Michael Z. Michael;Susan M. O' Connor;Nicholas G. van Holst Pellekaan;Graeme P. Young

  • Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes

    Eline H Schreuders;Arlinda Ruco;Linda Rabeneck;Robert E Schoen

  • Butyrate production from dietary fibre and protection against large bowel cancer in a rat model.

    A McIntyre;P R Gibson;G P Young

  • Induction of Caspase-3 Protease Activity and Apoptosis by Butyrate and Trichostatin A (Inhibitors of Histone Deacetylase): Dependence on Protein Synthesis and Synergy with a Mitochondrial/Cytochrome c-dependent Pathway

    Vicente Medina;Belinda Edmonds;Graeme P. Young;Robert James

  • Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening

    J J Y Sung;J Y W Lau;G P Young;Y Sano

  • An updated Asia Pacific Consensus Recommendations on colorectal cancer screening

    J J Y Sung;Siew Ng;F Chan;Han-mo Chiu

  • A 3-year Randomized Clinical Trial of MiSight Lenses for Myopia Control.

    Paul Chamberlain;Sofia C Peixoto-de-Matos;Nicola S Logan;Cheryl Ngo

  • Effects of short chain fatty acids on a new human colon carcinoma cell line (LIM1215).

    R H Whitehead;G P Young;P S Bhathal

  • Colorectal and Other Cancer Risks for Carriers and Noncarriers From Families With a DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation: A Prospective Cohort Study

    Aung Ko Win;Joanne P Young;Noralane M Lindor;Katherine M. Tucker

  • A multi‐centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers

    Graeme Young;Jane Veys;Nicola Pritchard;Sarah Coleman

  • Effect of resistant starch on fecal bulk and fermentation-dependent events in humans

    Jodi Phillips;Jane G. Muir;Anne Birkett;Zhong X. Lu

  • Metachronous Colorectal Cancer Risk for Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation Carriers: The Advantage of More Extensive Colon Surgery

    Susan Parry;Susan Parry;Aung Ko Win;Bryan Parry;Finlay A Macrae

  • Amylase-resistant starch plus oral rehydration solution for cholera.

    B.S. Ramakrishna;S. Venkataraman;P. Srinivasan;Pratap Dash

  • World Endoscopy Organization Consensus Statements on Post-Colonoscopy and Post-Imaging Colorectal Cancer.

    Matthew D. Rutter;Matthew D. Rutter;Iosif Beintaris;Roland Valori;Han Mo Chiu

  • Colorectal Neoplasia Differentially Expressed (CRNDE), a Novel Gene with Elevated Expression in Colorectal Adenomas and Adenocarcinomas.

    Lloyd D. Graham;Susanne K. Pedersen;Glenn S. Brown;Thu Ho

  • Cancer Risks for MLH1 and MSH2 Mutation Carriers

    James G Dowty;Aung K Win;Daniel D Buchanan;Noralane M Lindor

  • Management of digital eye strain.

    Chantal Coles-Brennan;Anna Sulley;Graeme Young

  • A Synbiotic Combination of Resistant Starch and Bifidobacterium lactis Facilitates Apoptotic Deletion of Carcinogen-Damaged Cells in Rat Colon

    Richard Kevin Le Leu;Ian Lewis Brown;Ying Hu;Anthony R Bird

  • Risks of Primary Extracolonic Cancers Following Colorectal Cancer in Lynch Syndrome

    Aung Ko Win;Noralane M. Lindor;Joanne P. Young;Finlay A. Macrae

  • The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the contact lens materials, design, and care subcommittee.

    Lyndon W. Jones;Noel A. Brennan;José Manuel González-Méijome;John Lally

Frequent Co-Authors

Ying Hu
Ying Hu National Institutes of Health
Carlene Wilson
Carlene Wilson Flinders University
Deborah Turnbull
Deborah Turnbull University of Adelaide
Joanne P. Young
Joanne P. Young University of Adelaide
Chris Hunt
Chris Hunt Liverpool John Moores University
Barbara A. Leggett
Barbara A. Leggett University of Queensland
Peter R. Gibson
Peter R. Gibson University of Newcastle Australia
Peter L. Molloy
Peter L. Molloy Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Daniel D. Buchanan
Daniel D. Buchanan University of Melbourne
John L. Hopper
John L. Hopper University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding career pathways beyond becoming a doctor. Many professionals choose to expand their expertise through online graduate degrees that can boost employability, offer flexible learning, and lead to leadership roles in the healthcare sector.

For those interested in healthcare management, pursuing one of the cheapest master's in healthcare administration can be a smart, cost-effective option. Those aiming for advanced clinical practice may explore the least expensive dnp programs to become leaders in nursing.

The healthcare landscape is also evolving with the increasing demand for pharmacists and health informatics professionals. If you are considering pharmacy, look into online pharmd programs for flexible and affordable training. Alternatively, a degree in health informatics can position you at the forefront of healthcare technology.

Best Scientists Citing Graeme P. Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles