World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
35
Citations
7399
World Ranking
9241
National Ranking
351

Glenn Newnham publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn Newnham sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 102 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Glenn Newnham D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn Newnham sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Glenn Newnham is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with notable contributions in related subfields such as Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Safety Research.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications, Oil Palm Production and Sustainability, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, Forest Ecology and Management, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education.

Frequent publication venues for Glenn Newnham include:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society
  • Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation

Their recent papers cover diverse aspects of environmental monitoring, AI ethics, and land cover assessment. Notable publications include:

  • "Tree species classification using structural features derived from terrestrial laser scanning," 2020, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • "AI Ethics Principles in Practice: Perspectives of Designers and Developers," 2023, IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society
  • "Assessing Accuracy of Land Cover Change Maps Derived from Automated Digital Processing and Visual Interpretation in Tropical Forests in Indonesia," 2021, Remote Sensing
  • "StrucNet: a global network for automated vegetation structure monitoring," 2023, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
  • "Developing Multi-Source Indices to Discriminate between Native Tropical Forests, Oil Palm and Rubber Plantations in Indonesia," 2021, Remote Sensing

Glenn Newnham has collaborated frequently with colleagues such as Liubov Volkova, Inggit Lolita Sari, Christopher J. Weston, Kim Calders, and Niall Origo.

Best Publications

  • Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series

    Jan Verbesselt;Robin John Hyndman;Glenn Newnham;Darius Culvenor

  • Nondestructive estimates of above‐ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning

    Kim Calders;Glenn Newnham;Andrew Burt;Simon Murphy

  • Estimating canopy structure of Douglas-fir forest stands from discrete-return LiDAR

    Nicholas C. Coops;Thomas Hilker;Michael A. Wulder;Benoît St-Onge

  • Estimating forest LAI profiles and structural parameters using a ground-based laser called ‘Echidna®☆

    David L.B. Jupp;D.S. Culvenor;J.L. Lovell;G.J. Newnham

  • Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Plot-Scale Forest Measurement

    Glenn J. Newnham;John D. Armston;Kim Calders;Kim Calders;Mathias I. Disney

  • Retrieval of forest structural parameters using a ground-based lidar instrument (Echidna ® )

    Alan H Strahler;David L.B Jupp;Curtis E Woodcock;Crystal B Schaaf

  • Measuring forest structure and biomass in New England forest stands using Echidna ground-based lidar

    Tian Yao;Tian Yao;Xiaoyuan Yang;Feng Zhao;Zhuosen Wang;Zhuosen Wang

  • Comparing canopy metrics derived from terrestrial and airborne laser scanning in a Douglas-fir dominated forest stand

    Thomas Hilker;Martin van Leeuwen;Nicholas C. Coops;Michael A. Wulder

  • Measuring tree stem diameters using intensity profiles from ground-based scanning lidar from a fixed viewpoint

    J.L. Lovell;D.L.B. Jupp;G.J. Newnham;D.S. Culvenor

  • Measuring Effective Leaf Area Index, Foliage Profile, and Stand Height in New England Forest Stands Using a Full-Waveform Ground-Based Lidar

    Feng Zhao;Xiaoyuan Yang;Mitchell A. Schull;Miguel O. Román-Colón

  • Simulation study for finding optimal lidar acquisition parameters for forest height retrieval

    J.L. Lovell;D.L.B. Jupp;G.J. Newnham;N.C. Coops

  • The influence of scan mode and circle fitting on tree stem detection, stem diameter and volume extraction from terrestrial laser scans

    Pyare Pueschel;Glenn Newnham;Gilles Rock;Thomas Udelhoven

  • Three-dimensional forest reconstruction and structural parameter retrievals using a terrestrial full-waveform lidar instrument (Echidna®)

    Xiaoyuan Yang;Xiaoyuan Yang;Alan H. Strahler;Crystal B. Schaaf;David L.B. Jupp

  • Assessment of standing wood and fiber quality using ground and airborne laser scanning: A review

    Martin van Leeuwen;Thomas Hilker;Nicholas C. Coops;Gordon Frazer

  • Implications of sensor configuration and topography on vertical plant profiles derived from terrestrial LiDAR

    Kim Calders;John Armston;Glenn Newnham;Martin Herold

  • Developing good practice guidance for estimating land degradation in the context of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

    Neil C. Sims;Jacqueline R. England;Glenn J. Newnham;Sasha Alexander

  • Status and prospects for LiDAR remote sensing of forested ecosystems

    Michael A Wulder;Nicholas C Coops;Andrew T Hudak;Felix Morsdorf

  • Measuring Gap Fraction, Element Clumping Index and LAI in Sierra Forest Stands Using a Full-Waveform Ground-Based Lidar

    Feng Zhao;Feng Zhao;Alan H. Strahler;Crystal L. Schaaf;Crystal L. Schaaf;Tian Yao

  • Finding Leaves in the Forest: The Dual-Wavelength Echidna Lidar

    Ewan S. Douglas;Jason Martel;Zhan Li;Glenn Howe

  • Tree species classification using structural features derived from terrestrial laser scanning

    Louise Terryn;Kim Calders;Mathias Disney;Niall Origo

  • Estimation of chlorophyll content in Eucalyptus globulus foliage with the leaf reflectance model PROSPECT

    K.M. Barry;K.M. Barry;G.J. Newnham;C. Stone

Frequent Co-Authors

Darius S. Culvenor
Darius S. Culvenor Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
David L.B. Jupp
David L.B. Jupp Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Alan H. Strahler
Alan H. Strahler Boston University
Curtis E. Woodcock
Curtis E. Woodcock Boston University
Nicholas C. Coops
Nicholas C. Coops University of British Columbia
Kim Calders
Kim Calders Ghent University
John Armston
John Armston University of Maryland, College Park
Zhuosen Wang
Zhuosen Wang University of Maryland, College Park
Crystal B. Schaaf
Crystal B. Schaaf University of Massachusetts Boston
Feng Zhao
Feng Zhao Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields that play a critical role in understanding and protecting our planet. For those interested in the Earth's physical processes, pursuing a geology degree online offers specialized knowledge in rock formations, mineralogy, and earth systems.

Another growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), essential for mapping and spatial analysis in environmental planning and resource management. A gis degree can provide technical skills to leverage geographic data for informed decision-making.

For those looking to influence public policy, leadership, and administration in environmental sectors, pursuing online mpa degrees (Master of Public Administration) equips students with the expertise needed to manage programs, budgets, and policy implementation effectively.

Moreover, environmental issues often intersect with societal behavior and structures. Careers in this space benefit from a strong foundation in human dynamics provided by the best online bachelors in sociology programs, which focus on social patterns and cultural impacts relevant to sustainability and environmental justice.

Best Scientists Citing Glenn Newnham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles