World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
10190
World Ranking
7286
National Ranking
266

David L.B. Jupp publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L.B. Jupp sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 139 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

David L.B. Jupp D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L.B. Jupp sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

David L.B. Jupp is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily covers Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, contributing to a range of subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Aerospace Engineering.

Their recent research outputs include papers published in various scientific journals, covering topics that span atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, calibration and measurement techniques, soil geostatistics and mapping, landslides and related hazards, as well as cryospheric studies and observations.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by David L.B. Jupp include:

  • The Impact of Choice of Solar Spectral Irradiance Model on Atmospheric Correction of Landsat 8 OLI Satellite Data, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Uncertainties and errors in algorithms for elevation gradients, 2020, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
  • Choice of Solar Spectral Irradiance Model for Current and Future Remote Sensing Satellite Missions, 2023, Remote Sensing
  • Assessing an Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for Time Series of Satellite-Based Water-Leaving Reflectance Using Match-Up Sites in Australian Coastal Waters, 2021, Remote Sensing
  • "We and malaria are already friends, becoming one," A qualitative study on malaria risk perception in Eastern Indonesia, 2023, Research Square (Research Square)

Frequent coauthors with whom they have collaborated include:

  • Fuqin Li
  • Stephen Sagar
  • Thomas Schroeder
  • Brian L. Markham
  • Ian Lau

David L.B. Jupp publishes regularly in several scientific venues, with the most frequent publication outlets being:

  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Remote Sensing
  • International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Their work addresses a broad spectrum of subjects within their fields of study, dealing with important aspects of atmospheric and environmental dynamics, satellite data correction, and remote sensing applications. The topics covered reflect a focus on improving scientific understanding and technical methodologies in environmental and earth sciences through collaborative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Preprocessing EO-1 Hyperion hyperspectral data to support the application of agricultural indexes

    B. Datt;T.R. McVicar;T.G. Van Niel;D.L.B. Jupp

  • Using airborne and ground-based ranging lidar to measure canopy structure in Australian forests

    J L Lovell;D L.B. Jupp;D S Culvenor;N C Coops

  • Stable Iterative Methods for the Inversion of Geophysical Data

    D. L. B. Jupp;K. Vozoff

  • Joint Inversion of Geophysical Data

    K. Vozoff;D. L. B. Jupp

  • The use of variograms in remote sensing: I. Scene models and simulated images

    Curtis E. Woodcock;Alan H. Strahler;David L.B. Jupp

  • The use of variograms in remote sensing: II. Real digital images

    Curtis E. Woodcock;Alan H. Strahler;David L.B. Jupp

  • The current and potential operational uses of remote sensing to aid decisions on drought exceptional circumstances in Australia: a review

    Tim R. McVicar;David L.B. Jupp

  • Modeling lidar waveforms in heterogeneous and discrete canopies

    W. Ni-Meister;D.L.B. Jupp;R. Dubayah

  • Estimating forest LAI profiles and structural parameters using a ground-based laser called ‘Echidna®☆

    David L.B. Jupp;D.S. Culvenor;J.L. Lovell;G.J. Newnham

  • Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images. I. Basic theory

    D.L.B. Jupp;A.H. Strahler;C.E. Woodcock

  • The joint use of coincident loop transient electromagnetic and Schlumberger sounding to resolve layered structures

    A. P. Raiche;D. L. B. Jupp;H. Rutter;K. Vozoff

  • Retrieval of forest structural parameters using a ground-based lidar instrument (Echidna ® )

    Alan H Strahler;David L.B Jupp;Curtis E Woodcock;Crystal B Schaaf

  • Measuring forest structure and biomass in New England forest stands using Echidna ground-based lidar

    Tian Yao;Tian Yao;Xiaoyuan Yang;Feng Zhao;Zhuosen Wang;Zhuosen Wang

  • Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images. II. Simple image models

    D.L.B. Jupp;A.H. Strahler;C.E. Woodcock

  • Background and Extensions to Depth of Penetration (DOP) Mapping in Shallow Coastal Waters

    David L. B. Jupp

  • Comparing canopy metrics derived from terrestrial and airborne laser scanning in a Douglas-fir dominated forest stand

    Thomas Hilker;Martin van Leeuwen;Nicholas C. Coops;Michael A. Wulder

  • Measuring tree stem diameters using intensity profiles from ground-based scanning lidar from a fixed viewpoint

    J.L. Lovell;D.L.B. Jupp;G.J. Newnham;D.S. Culvenor

  • Detection, identification and mapping of cyanobacteria — Using remote sensing to measure the optical quality of turbid inland waters

    D. L. B. Jupp;J. T. O. Kirk;G. P. Harris

  • Measuring Effective Leaf Area Index, Foliage Profile, and Stand Height in New England Forest Stands Using a Full-Waveform Ground-Based Lidar

    Feng Zhao;Xiaoyuan Yang;Mitchell A. Schull;Miguel O. Román-Colón

  • Modeling bidirectional reflectance of forests and woodlands using boolean models and geometric optics

    Alan H. Strahler;David L.B. Jupp

  • The use of variograms in remote sensing. I - Scene models and simulated images. II - Real digital images

    Curtis E. Woodcock;Alan H. Strahler;David L. B. Jupp

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan H. Strahler
Alan H. Strahler Boston University
Glenn Newnham
Glenn Newnham Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Curtis E. Woodcock
Curtis E. Woodcock Boston University
Darius S. Culvenor
Darius S. Culvenor Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Crystal B. Schaaf
Crystal B. Schaaf University of Massachusetts Boston
Zhuosen Wang
Zhuosen Wang University of Maryland, College Park
Tim R. McVicar
Tim R. McVicar Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Xiaowen Li
Xiaowen Li Tsinghua University
Nicholas C. Coops
Nicholas C. Coops University of British Columbia
Jetse D. Kalma
Jetse D. Kalma University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career options, often supported by advanced degrees. For those interested in further academic achievement without the lengthy dissertation process, exploring a doctorate degree online no dissertation can be a viable alternate path.

Professionals aiming to transition into leadership or specialized roles may consider programs like accredited eds to edd programs, which provide streamlined advancement from education specialist to doctoral levels. This is particularly relevant for educators looking to influence environmental policy and community programs.

Social work and environmental advocacy often overlap, making fully funded dsw programs an attractive option for those wanting to integrate social justice with environmental sustainability through a doctoral social work degree.

Alternatively, students seeking flexible and cost-effective learning paths might opt for one of the most affordable online general studies degree programs. These programs offer a broad foundation, allowing customization of studies that can complement environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing David L.B. Jupp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles