World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 13096 6685 771 30466

Gerald P. Murphy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gerald P. Murphy between 1960 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gerald P. Murphy published across 65 years, from 1960 to 2024, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 51 publications in 1972. 9 of the 786 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1960 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 51. Peak 51 publications in 1972. 1960: 1 publication 1961: 7 publications 1962: 2 publications 1963: 4 publications 1964: 11 publications 1965: 6 publications 1966: 12 publications 1967: 9 publications 1968: 30 publications 1969: 43 publications 1970: 47 publications 1971: 29 publications 1972: 51 publications 1973: 37 publications 1974: 25 publications 1975: 31 publications 1976: 27 publications 1977: 29 publications 1978: 26 publications 1979: 22 publications 1980: 34 publications 1981: 32 publications 1982: 27 publications 1983: 21 publications 1984: 35 publications 1985: 14 publications 1986: 16 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 8 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 1 publication
1960 2024

786 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gerald P. Murphy: publications per year, 1960 to 2024
Year Publications
1960 1
1961 7
1962 2
1963 4
1964 11
1965 6
1966 12
1967 9
1968 30
1969 43
1970 47
1971 29
1972 51
1973 37
1974 25
1975 31
1976 27
1977 29
1978 26
1979 22
1980 34
1981 32
1982 27
1983 21
1984 35
1985 14
1986 16
1987 11
1988 8
1989 5
1990 3
1991 4
1992 1
1993 8
1994 9
1995 9
1996 11
1997 18
1998 20
1999 13
2000 13
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 0
2007 1
2008 1
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 1
2014 0
2015 1
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 4
2023 8
2024 1
Total 786
Download as CSV

Gerald P. Murphy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerald P. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 761–780 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 771 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228 771
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Gerald P. Murphy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerald P. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gerald P. Murphy was affiliated with the Roswell Park Cancer Institute in the United States. Their research contributions were primarily documented through several recent papers published between 2021 and 2022, reflecting involvement in editorial board issues for surgical oncology and prostate cancer journals.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Issue Information, 2021, The Prostate
  • Issue Information, 2021, The Prostate
  • Issue Information - Ed Board, 2021, Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Issue Information - Ed Board, 2022, Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Issue Information - Ed Board, 2021, Journal of Surgical Oncology

Throughout their career, they frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • David P. Winchester
  • Stephen Sener
  • Walley Temple
  • Perry Shen
  • Joel Baumgartner

The primary publication venues for their work included:

  • Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • The Prostate

Best Publications

  • LNCaP model of human prostatic carcinoma.

    J S Horoszewicz;S S Leong;E Kawinski;J P Karr

  • PURIFICATION OF A HUMAN PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN

    M.C. Wang;L.A. Valenzuela;G.P. Murphy;T.M. Chu

  • Management and survival of female breast cancer: Results of a national survey by the American college of surgeons

    Takuma Nemoto;Josef Vana;Ramez N. Bedwani;Harvey W. Baker

  • Phase I clinical trial: T-cell therapy for prostate cancer using autologous dendritic cells pulsed with HLA-A0201-specific peptides from prostate-specific membrane antigen

    G. Murphy;B. Tjoa;H. Ragde;G. Kenny

  • Prostate antigen: A new potential marker for prostatic cancer

    M. C. Wang;L. D. Papsidero;M. Kuriyama;L. A. Valenzuela

  • A prostate antigen in sera of prostatic cancer patients.

    L D Papsidero;M C Wang;L A Valenzuela;G P Murphy

  • Circulating levels of interleukin-6 in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer.

    Darrel E. Drachenberg;Abdel-Aziz A. Elgamal;Ron Rowbotham;Mary Peterson

  • Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Patients With Different Cancers

    Gustavo Reynoso;Tsann Ming Chu;Douglas Holyoke;Elias Cohen

  • Infusion of dendritic cells pulsed with HLA‐A2‐specific prostate‐specific membrane antigen peptides: A phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial involving patients with hormone‐refractory metastatic disease

    G.P. Murphy;B.A. Tjoa;S.J. Simmons;J. Jarisch

  • Quantitation of Prostate-specific Antigen in Serum by a Sensitive Enzyme Immunoassay

    Kuriyama M;Wang Mc;Papsidero Ld;Killian Cs

  • Evaluation of phase I/II clinical trials in prostate cancer with dendritic cells and PSMA peptides.

    B.A. Tjoa;S.J. Simmons;V.A. Bowes;H. Ragde

  • Noninvasive breast carcinoma: results of a national survey by the American College of Surgeons.

    Dutzu Rosner;Ramez N. Bedwani;Josef Vana;Harvey W. Baker

  • Prostate Antigen: A Marker for Human Prostate Epithelial Cells

    L D Papsidero;M Kuriyama;M C Wang;J Horoszewicz

  • Current evaluation of the tissue localization and diagnostic utility of prostate specific membrane antigen.

    Gerald P. Murphy;Abdel-Aziz A. Elgamal;Sai L. Su;David G. Bostwick

  • Phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial: Report of a study involving 37 patients with disease recurrence following primary treatment

    G.P. Murphy;B.A. Tjoa;S.J. Simmons;H. Ragde

  • Use of human prostate-specific antigen in monitoring prostate cancer.

    Manabu Kuriyama;Ming C. Wang;Ching-li Lee;Lawrence D. Papsidero

  • Trends in patterns of care for prostatic cancer, 1974-1983: results of surveys by the American College of Surgeons.

    Joseph D. Schmidt;Joseph D. Schmidt;Curtis J. Mettlin;Curtis J. Mettlin;Nachimuthu Natarajan;Nachimuthu Natarajan;Barbara B. Peace;Barbara B. Peace

  • Current status of the therapy of advanced renal carcinoma.

    William J. Hrushesky;Gerald P. Murphy;Gerald P. Murphy

  • Prognostic importance of prostate-specific antigen for monitoring patients with stages B2 to D1 prostate cancer.

    Killian Cs;Yang N;Emrich Lj;Vargas Fp

  • Treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer patients with chemotherapy agents in combination with hormones versus hormones alone

    Gerald P. Murphy;Sunmolu Beckley;Mark F. Brady;T. Ming Chu

Frequent Co-Authors

Avery A. Sandberg
Avery A. Sandberg Roswell Park Cancer Institute
David G. McLeod
David G. McLeod Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Herman R. Menck
Herman R. Menck University of Southern California
David P. Winchester
David P. Winchester American College of Surgeons
Mark S. Soloway
Mark S. Soloway Memorial Hospital of South Bend
Judd W. Moul
Judd W. Moul Duke University
Alan W. Partin
Alan W. Partin Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Willet F. Whitmore
Willet F. Whitmore Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Peter T. Scardino
Peter T. Scardino Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Keerti V. Shah
Keerti V. Shah Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about medicine but seeking flexible alternatives to traditional pathways, a range of online degrees and career options in healthcare are worth exploring. For those interested in the administrative side, medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid can provide an accessible gateway into healthcare settings. These programs often allow for remote study and can help launch a career quickly.

For prospective nurses, some nursing school no entrance exam options eliminate common testing barriers, making entry into the nursing profession easier for many students.

Seeking leadership roles? Earning a health administration degree online can prepare you for executive and management positions in hospitals or healthcare organizations. These accelerated programs are designed for working adults balancing education with other commitments.

Registered Nurses aiming to become Family Nurse Practitioners can also benefit from streamlined education pathways, like rn to fnp programs that bridge associate degrees to advanced practice nursing careers. Exploring these related degrees can open multiple doors in the growing healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Gerald P. Murphy

Recently Published Articles