World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Georges Köhler

Georges Köhler

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
43
Citations
33848
World Ranking
19325
National Ranking
1317

Georges Köhler publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Georges Köhler sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 95 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Georges Köhler D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Georges Köhler sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1984 - Nobel Prize for theories concerning the specificity in development and control of the immune system and the discovery of the principle for production of monoclonal antibodies
  • 1984 - Albert Lasker Award for Basic Medical Research, Lasker Foundation
  • 1982 - Karl Landsteiner Memorial Award, American Association of Blood Banks (AABB)
  • 1981 - Canada Gairdner International Award
  • 1963 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Georges Köhler is affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany. The scope of their scientific contributions includes research primarily situated within immunology and molecular biology, as evidenced by the prestigious recognitions received.

Throughout their career, Georges Köhler has been awarded various honors. Notably, they were a recipient of the Albert Lasker Award for Basic Medical Research in 1984. In the same year, Köhler received the Nobel Prize for theories concerning the specificity in development and control of the immune system and the discovery of the principle for production of monoclonal antibodies. Earlier distinctions include the Karl Landsteiner Memorial Award from the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) in 1982, the Canada Gairdner International Award in 1981, and election as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1963. Köhler is also a member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO).

These awards and memberships highlight Köhler's contributions to foundational immunological concepts, particularly relating to antibody production and immune system specificity. Their affiliation with one of Europe's leading research institutions underscores a career embedded in advanced biomedical research.

Best Publications

  • Impaired immune and acute-phase responses in interleukin-6-deficient mice

    Manfred Kopf;Heinz Baumann;Giulia Freer;Marina Freudenberg

  • Disruption of the murine IL-4 gene blocks Th2 cytokine responses

    M Kopf;G Le Gros;M Bachmann;M C Lamers

  • IL-5-Deficient Mice Have a Developmental Defect in CD5+ B-1 Cells and Lack Eosinophilia but Have Normal Antibody and Cytotoxic T Cell Responses

    Manfred Kopf;Frank Brombacher;Philip D Hodgkin;Alistair J Ramsay

  • CD22 is a negative regulator of B cell receptor signalling

    L. Nitschke;R. Carsetti;B. Ocker;G. Kohler

  • Transitional B cells are the target of negative selection in the B cell compartment.

    Rita Carsetti;Georges Köhler;Marinus C. Lamers

  • Assembly and secretion of heavy chains that do not associate posttranslationally with immunoglobulin heavy chain-binding protein.

    L Hendershot;D Bole;G Köhler;J F Kearney

  • Negative feedback regulation of IgE synthesis by murine CD23

    Philipp Yu;Marie Kosco-Vilbois;Mark Richards;Georges Köhler

  • Transmission and expression of a specific pair of rearranged immunoglobulin mu and kappa genes in a transgenic mouse line.

    Sandro Rusconi;Sandro Rusconi;Georges Köhler;Georges Köhler

  • The IgM antigen receptor of B lymphocytes is associated with prohibitin and a prohibitin-related protein.

    M. Terashima;Kwang-Myong Kim;T. Adachi;P. J. Nielsen

  • Impaired mucosal immune responses in interleukin 4-targeted mice.

    M Vajdy;M H Kosco-Vilbois;M Kopf;G Köhler

  • IgD can largely substitute for loss of IgM function in B cells

    Claudia Lutz;Birgit Ledermann;Marie H. Kosco-Vilbois;Adrian F. Ochsenbein

  • Immune Responses of IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐6 Deficient Mice

    Manfred Kopf;Graham Le Gros;Anthony J. Coyle;Marie Kosco-Vtlbois

  • Efficient targeting of the IL-4 gene in a BALB/c embryonic stem cell line

    Nancy Noben-Trauth;Georges Köhler;Kurt Bürki;Birgit Ledermann

  • Schistosoma mansoni in IL-4-deficient mice

    Edward J. Pearce;Allen Cheever;Susan Leonard;Maria Covalesky

  • The immune response to Plasmodium chabaudi malaria in interleukin-4-deficient mice.

    Thierry von der Weid;Manfred Kopf;Georges Köhler;Jean Langhorne

  • Immunoglobulin D-deficient Mice Can Mount Normal Immune Responses to Thymus-Independent and -Dependent Antigens

    Lars Nitschke;Marie H. Kosco;Georges Kohler;Marinus C. Lamers

  • Two new proteins preferentially associated with membrane immunoglobulin D.

    Kwang-Myong Kim;T. Adachi;P. J. Nielsen;M. Terashima

  • Altered erythrocytes and a leaky block in B-cell development in CD24/HSA-deficient mice.

    P.J. Nielsen;B. Lorenz;A.M. Müller;R.H. Wenger

  • Monoclonal antibodies specific for murine IgM. I: Characterization of antigenic determinants on the four constant domains of the μ heavy chain

    Maria Leptin;Maria Leptin;Mary Jane Potash;Rudolf Grützmann;Christoph Heusser

  • A role for immunoglobulin D: interference with tolerance induction.

    Rita Carsetti;Georges Köhler;Marinus C. Lamers

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred Kopf
Manfred Kopf ETH Zurich
Frank Brombacher
Frank Brombacher University of Cape Town
Rita Carsetti
Rita Carsetti Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital
Hermann Eibel
Hermann Eibel University Medical Center Freiburg
Jean Langhorne
Jean Langhorne The Francis Crick Institute
Horst Bluethmann
Horst Bluethmann Roche (Switzerland)
Lars Nitschke
Lars Nitschke University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Michael Reth
Michael Reth University of Freiburg
Klaus Eichmann
Klaus Eichmann Max Planck Society
Rolf M. Zinkernagel
Rolf M. Zinkernagel University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to a variety of career paths, especially in the healthcare sector. One popular option is medical coding, which ensures healthcare providers get paid by insurance companies. Are you wondering how much do medical coders make? Salaries can be competitive and often increase with advanced credentials and experience.

Another pathway to consider is medical billing and coding. However, it’s important to ask, is medical billing and coding worth it? Exploring the pros and cons will help you determine if this field aligns with your interests and strengths.

For those seeking a broader role in healthcare data, a bachelor's degree health information management is a strong option. These programs can be found online, making it easier for students to balance education with other commitments.

If nutrition science interests you, an advanced online degree can be both flexible and affordable. Explore the cheapest online nutrition degree options to find programs that fit your budget while expanding your career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Georges Köhler