World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
38
Citations
5094
World Ranking
8688
National Ranking
55

Evangelia Diapouli publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evangelia Diapouli sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 102 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Evangelia Diapouli D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evangelia Diapouli sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Evangelia Diapouli is affiliated with the National Centre of Scientific Research Demokritos in Greece. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on health, atmospheric, and environmental aspects related to air quality and pollution.

Their work extensively covers several subfields, including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, and Automotive Engineering. The main topics of their research include Air Quality and Health Impacts, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting, Vehicle emissions and performance, Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, and Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure.

Diapouli's publications appear frequently in specialized scientific journals and venues, indicating a broad engagement across the environmental science community. Common publication venues include:

  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Research
  • Atmospheric Environment
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Their recent papers reflect a focus on particulate matter assessment and characterization as well as source apportionment in urban and transport contexts:

  • Ambient particulate matter source apportionment using receptor modelling in European and Central Asia urban areas, 2020, Environmental Pollution
  • Relationship between indoor and outdoor size-fractionated particulate matter in urban microenvironments: Levels, chemical composition and sources, 2020, Environmental Research
  • Children's exposure and dose assessment to particulate matter in Lisbon, 2020, Building and Environment
  • Quantitative assessment of the variability in chemical profiles from source apportionment analysis of PM10 and PM2.5 at different sites within a large metropolitan area, 2020, Environmental Research
  • Chemical characterisation of particulate matter in urban transport modes, 2020, Journal of Environmental Sciences

Frequent collaborators in Diapouli's work include Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Manousos Ioannis Manousakas, Maria I. Gini, Susana Marta Almeida, and Andrés Alástuey, indicating active collaboration with other researchers specializing in environmental and atmospheric sciences.

Best Publications

  • AIRUSE-LIFE+: a harmonized PM speciation and source apportionment in five southern European cities

    Fulvio Amato;Andrés Alastuey;Angeliki Karanasiou;Franco Lucarelli

  • Assessment of PM2.5 sources and their corresponding level of uncertainty in a coastal urban area using EPA PMF 5.0 enhanced diagnostics.

    M. Manousakas;H. Papaefthymiou;E. Diapouli;A. Migliori

  • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives (nitro-PAHs, oxygenated PAHs, and azaarenes) in PM 2.5 from Southern European cities

    Célia A. Alves;Ana M. Vicente;Danilo Custódio;Mário Cerqueira

  • Soot Reference Materials for instrument calibration and intercomparisons: a workshop summary with recommendations

    D. Baumgardner;O. Popovicheva;J. Allan;V. Bernardoni

  • Factors controlling air quality in different European subway systems

    Vânia Martins;Vânia Martins;Teresa Moreno;Luís Mendes;Konstantinos Eleftheriadis

  • Estimating the concentration of indoor particles of outdoor origin: A review

    E Diapouli;A Chaloulakou;P Koutrakis

  • Indoor and outdoor PM mass and number concentrations at schools in the Athens area.

    E. Diapouli;A. Chaloulakou;N. Mihalopoulos;N. Spyrellis

  • Evolution of air pollution source contributions over one decade, derived by PM10 and PM2.5 source apportionment in two metropolitan urban areas in Greece

    E. Diapouli;M. Manousakas;S. Vratolis;V. Vasilatou

  • Ambient particulate matter source apportionment using receptor modelling in European and Central Asia urban areas

    S M Almeida;M Manousakas;E Diapouli;Z Kertesz

  • Levels of ultrafine particles in different microenvironments--implications to children exposure.

    E. Diapouli;A. Chaloulakou;N. Spyrellis

  • ECOC comparison exercise with identical thermal protocols after temperature offset correction – instrument diagnostics by in-depth evaluation of operational parameters

    P. Panteliadis;T. Hafkenscheid;B. Cary;E. Diapouli

  • Evaluation of receptor and chemical transport models for PM10 source apportionment

    C.A. Belis;D. Pernigotti;G. Pirovano;O. Favez

  • AIRUSE-LIFE +: estimation of natural source contributions to urban ambient air PM 10 and PM 2. 5 concentrations in southern Europe – implications to compliance with limit values

    Evangelia Diapouli;Manousos Ioannis Manousakas;Sterios Vratolis;Vasiliki Vasilatou

  • Physicochemical characterization of aged biomass burning aerosol after long-range transport to Greece from large scale wildfires in Russia and surrounding regions, Summer 2010

    E. Diapouli;O. Popovicheva;M. Kistler;S. Vratolis

  • Annual Variability of Black Carbon Concentrations Originating from Biomass and Fossil Fuel Combustion for the Suburban Aerosol in Athens, Greece

    Evangelia Diapouli;Athina-Cerise Kalogridis;Christina Markantonaki;Stergios Vratolis

  • Source apportionment by PMF on elemental concentrations obtained by PIXE analysis of PM10 samples collected at the vicinity of lignite power plants and mines in Megalopolis, Greece

    M. Manousakas;E. Diapouli;H. Papaefthymiou;A. Migliori

  • Indoor and Outdoor Particle Number and Mass Concentrations in Athens. Sources, Sinks and Variability of Aerosol Parameters

    Evangelia Diapouli;Konstantinos Eleftheriadis;Angeliki A. Karanasiou;Sterios Vratolis

  • A new methodology to assess the performance and uncertainty of source apportionment models II : the results of two European intercomparison exercises

    C.A. Belis;F. Karagulian;Fulvio Amato;M. Almeida

  • On the quantification of atmospheric carbonate carbon by thermal/optical analysis protocols

    Angeliki Karanasiou;Evangelia Diapouli;Fabrizia Cavalli;K. Eleftheriadis

  • Smoke aerosol chemistry and aging of Siberian biomass burning emissions in a large aerosol chamber

    A.-C. Kalogridis;O.B. Popovicheva;G. Engling;E. Diapouli

  • Impact of the 2009 Attica wild fires on the air quality in urban Athens

    V. Amiridis;C. Zerefos;C. Zerefos;S. Kazadzis;E. Gerasopoulos

Frequent Co-Authors

Konstantinos Eleftheriadis
Konstantinos Eleftheriadis National Centre of Scientific Research Demokritos
Susana Marta Almeida
Susana Marta Almeida Instituto Superior Técnico
Xavier Querol
Xavier Querol Spanish National Research Council
Angeliki Karanasiou
Angeliki Karanasiou Spanish National Research Council
Franco Lucarelli
Franco Lucarelli National Institute for Nuclear Physics
Silvia Nava
Silvia Nava National Institute for Nuclear Physics
Fulvio Amato
Fulvio Amato Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research
Aikaterini Bougiatioti
Aikaterini Bougiatioti National Observatory of Athens
Guenter Engling
Guenter Engling Desert Research Institute
Célia Alves
Célia Alves University of Aveiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in broadening their understanding of society and its impact on the environment, pursuing an online bachelors in sociology can be a powerful complement to Environmental Sciences. Sociology offers insights into human behavior and social structures, which are essential when addressing environmental challenges.

Those aiming to advance in education roles related to environmental policy or community outreach might consider enrolling in education doctoral programs without dissertation, streamlining their pathway to higher qualifications without the traditional dissertation barrier. Such programs provide a practical route to leadership positions in educational settings.

Moreover, exploring the best online eds to edd programs allows professionals to progress from a master's to a doctoral level in education, strengthening their ability to influence environmental learning initiatives and policy development.

For those committed to social work within environmental contexts, identifying fully funded dsw programs can offer accessible pathways to doctoral degrees. This supports careers focused on community resilience, sustainable development, and environmental justice.

Best Scientists Citing Evangelia Diapouli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles