World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
56
Citations
13088
World Ranking
2789
National Ranking
852

Eric J. Seibel publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric J. Seibel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 327 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Eric J. Seibel D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric J. Seibel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric J. Seibel is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions spanning surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, biomedical engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist has contributed to research on various topics, including:

  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
  • Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders

The recent publications authored or co-authored by Eric J. Seibel include:

  • Multiplexed endoscopic imaging of Barrett's neoplasia using targeted fluorescent heptapeptides in a phase 1 proof-of-concept study, 2020, Gut
  • Detection of Barrett's neoplasia with a near-infrared fluorescent heterodimeric peptide, 2022, Endoscopy
  • Large field-of-view short-wave infrared metalens for scanning fiber endoscopy, 2023, Journal of Biomedical Optics
  • Prototype Development of a Temperature-Sensitive High-Adhesion Medical Tape to Reduce Medical-Adhesive-Related Skin Injury and Improve Quality of Care, 2022, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Cost-Efficient Video Synthesis and Evaluation for Development of Virtual 3D Endoscopy, 2021, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine

They frequently collaborate with other researchers, with co-authorship counts reflecting repeated partnerships:

  • Matthew D. Carson
  • Thomas D. Wang
  • Tse-Shao Chang
  • Richard S. Kwon
  • D. Kim Turgeon

Eric J. Seibel publishes often in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Biomedical Optics
  • IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine
  • Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
  • Global Translational Medicine

Best Publications

  • Catheterscope 3D Guidance and Interface System

    Timothy D. Soper;Robb W. Glenny;Eric J. Seibel

  • Medical imaging, diagnosis, and therapy using a scanning single optical fiber system

    Eric J. Seibel

  • Micro-fabricated optical waveguide for use in scanning fiber displays and scanned fiber image acquisition

    Mark E. Fauver;Eric J. Seibel;Chris M. Brown;Per G. Reinhall

  • Scanning laser projection display devices and methods for projecting one or more images onto a surface with light-scanning optical fiber

    Charles D. Melville;Richard S. Johnston;Cameron M. Lee;Eric J. Seibel

  • Virtual Reality Pain Control During Burn Wound Debridement in the Hydrotank

    Hunter G. Hoffman;David R. Patterson;Eric Seibel;Maryam Soltani

  • Scanning fiber endoscopy with highly flexible, 1 mm catheterscopes for wide-field, full-color imaging

    Cameron M. Lee;Christoph J. Engelbrecht;Timothy D. Soper;Fritjof Helmchen

  • Optical fiber scanner for performing multimodal optical imaging

    Eric Seibel;Xingde Li;Xiumei Liu

  • Ultra-compact fiber-optic two-photon microscope for functional fluorescence imaging in vivo

    Christoph J. Engelbrecht;Richard S. Johnston;Eric J. Seibel;Fritjof Helmchen

  • Method and apparatus of shadowgram formation for optical tomography

    Mark E. Fauver;John Richard Rahn;Eric J. Seibel;Alan C. Nelson

  • Virtual reality helmet display quality influences the magnitude of virtual reality analgesia.

    Hunter G. Hoffman;Eric J. Seibel;Todd L. Richards;Thomas A. Furness

  • Optical beam scanning system for compact image display or image acquisition

    Janet Crossman-Bosworth;Eric J. Seibel;Mark E. Fauver

  • Control of an optical fiber scanner

    Quinn Y. J. Smithwick;Eric J. Seibel;Mark Fauver

  • Miniature image acquistion system using a scanning resonant waveguide

    Eric J. Seibel;Thomas A. Furness

  • Scanning beam with variable sequential framing using interrupted scanning resonance

    Eric Seibel;Richard Johnston;Brandon Tuttle

  • Integrated optical scanning image acquisiting and display

    Wei-Chih Wang;Eric J. Seibel;Per G. Reinhall;Mark E. Fauver

  • Image acquisition with depth enhancement

    Eric J. Seibel;Quinn Y. J. Smithwick;Thomas A. Furness

  • Feasibility of articulated arm mounted Oculus Rift Virtual Reality goggles for adjunctive pain control during occupational therapy in pediatric burn patients.

    Hunter G. Hoffman;Hunter G. Hoffman;Walter J. Meyer;Maribel Ramirez;Maribel Ramirez;Linda Roberts

  • Optical fiber scope with both non-resonant illumination and resonant collection/imaging for multiple modes of operation

    Eric Seibel;Richard S. Johnston;Timothy Soper;Charles D. Melville

  • Virtual image registration in augmented display field

    Winyu Chinthammit;Eric Seibel;Thomas A Furness

  • Shadowing pipe mosaicing algorithms with application to esophageal endoscopy

    Robert E. Carroll;Eric J. Seibel;Steven M. Seitz

  • Scanning laser device and methods of use

    Eric J. Seibel;Thomas A. Reh;Blake Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas A. Furness
Thomas A. Furness University of Washington
Hunter G. Hoffman
Hunter G. Hoffman University of Washington
Thomas A. Neumann
Thomas A. Neumann Goddard Space Flight Center
Jason A. Dominitz
Jason A. Dominitz United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Blake Hannaford
Blake Hannaford University of Washington
Todd L. Richards
Todd L. Richards University of Washington
Krzysztof Palczewski
Krzysztof Palczewski University of California, Irvine
Shwetak N. Patel
Shwetak N. Patel University of Washington
David L. Gordon
David L. Gordon Flinders Medical Centre
Howard Jay Chizeck
Howard Jay Chizeck University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA can open doors to a variety of dynamic career paths. Many students interested in this field also consider complementary online degrees that help broaden their skills and expand career opportunities.

A project management degree online is a popular choice for those who want to lead teams or oversee complex projects. These programs teach essential skills in planning, budgeting, and team coordination. Curious about the possible job roles? Learn more about what can you do with a project management degree and discover the diverse industries in need of these professionals.

Technology and engineering graduates might also pursue online real estate degrees to specialize in property development, sales, or management—fields that increasingly rely on tech-savvy experts.

For those passionate about user experience and digital design, enrolling in ui ux degree programs provides a technical and creative edge. These programs are ideal for students aiming to work in app development, product design, or web interfaces.

Best Scientists Citing Eric J. Seibel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles