World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
4132
World Ranking
9471
National Ranking
3394

Erdal Yiğit publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erdal Yiğit sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 138 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Erdal Yiğit D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erdal Yiğit sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Erdal Yiğit is a researcher affiliated with George Mason University in the United States. Their work focuses primarily on fields within Physics and Astronomy as well as Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a particular emphasis on Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atmospheric Science. Their research contributions have also extended into Oceanography, Geophysics, and Surfaces, Coatings and Films.

The scientist's main topics of investigation include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics, Planetary Science and Exploration, Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Astro and Planetary Science, Geophysics and Gravity Measurements, and Earthquake Detection and Analysis.

Yiğit has authored or coauthored multiple publications, some of which have appeared in notable scientific journals and platforms. Their recent papers include:

  • Gravity Wave Activity in the Atmosphere of Mars During the 2018 Global Dust Storm: Simulations With a High-Resolution Model (2020), Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
  • Effects of Latitude-Dependent Gravity Wave Source Variations on the Middle and Upper Atmosphere (2021), Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • Role Of the Sun and the Middle atmosphere/thermosphere/ionosphere In Climate (ROSMIC): a retrospective and prospective view (2021), Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
  • Gravity Wave Activity in the Martian Atmosphere at Altitudes 20-160 km From ACS/TGO Occultation Measurements (2021), Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
  • Martian Dust Storms and Gravity Waves: Disentangling Water Transport to the Upper Atmosphere (2022), Journal of Geophysical Research Planets

Frequent coauthors that have collaborated with Yiğit include:

  • Alexander S. Medvedev
  • P. Hartogh
  • Md Nazmus Sakib
  • Dmitry S. Shaposhnikov
  • A. V. Rodin

Yiğit's research has been published across several recurring venues. These include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Loss of the Martian atmosphere to space: Present-day loss rates determined from MAVEN observations and integrated loss through time

    Bruce Jakosky;David Brain;Michael Chaffin;Shannon M. Curry

  • Internal wave coupling processes in Earth's atmosphere

    Erdal Yigit;Alexander S. Medvedev

  • Parameterization of the effects of vertically propagating gravity waves for thermosphere general circulation models: Sensitivity study

    Erdal Yiğit;Alan D. Aylward;Alexander S. Medvedev

  • A review of vertical coupling in the Atmosphere–Ionosphere system: Effects of waves, sudden stratospheric warmings, space weather, and of solar activity

    Erdal Yiğit;Petra Koucká Knížová;Katya Georgieva;William Ward

  • Modeling the effects of gravity wave momentum deposition on the general circulation above the turbopause

    Erdal Yiğit;Erdal Yiğit;Alexander S. Medvedev;Alan D. Aylward;Paul Hartogh

  • Introduction to Plasma

    Erdal Yiğit

  • Heating and cooling of the thermosphere by internal gravity waves

    Erdal Yiğit;Alexander S. Medvedev

  • Influence of gravity waves on the Martian atmosphere: General circulation modeling

    Alexander S. Medvedev;Erdal Yiğit;Paul Hartogh;Erich Becker

  • MAVEN NGIMS observations of atmospheric gravity waves in the Martian thermosphere

    S. L. England;G. Liu;E. Yiğit;P. R. Mahaffy

  • High-altitude gravity waves in the Martian thermosphere observed by MAVEN/NGIMS and modeled by a gravity wave scheme

    Erdal Yiğit;Erdal Yiğit;Scott L. England;Guiping Liu;Alexander S. Medvedev;Alexander S. Medvedev

  • Internal gravity waves in the thermosphere during low and high solar activity: Simulation study

    Erdal Yiğit;Erdal Yiğit;Alexander S. Medvedev

  • Global distribution and parameter dependences of gravity wave activity in the Martian upper thermosphere derived from MAVEN/NGIMS observations

    Naoki Terada;François Leblanc;Hiromu Nakagawa;Alexander S. Medvedev

  • Thermal effects of internal gravity waves in the Martian upper atmosphere

    Alexander S. Medvedev;Erdal Yiğit;Erdal Yiğit;Erdal Yiğit

  • General circulation modeling of the Martian upper atmosphere during global dust storms

    Alexander S. Medvedev;Erdal Yiğit;Erdal Yiğit;Takeshi Kuroda;Paul Hartogh

  • Cooling of the Martian thermosphere by CO2 radiation and gravity waves: An intercomparison study with two general circulation models

    Alexander S. Medvedev;Alexander S. Medvedev;Francisco González-Galindo;Erdal Yiğit;Artem G. Feofilov

  • Gravity waves in the thermosphere during a sudden stratospheric warming

    Erdal Yiğit;Erdal Yiğit;Alexander S. Medvedev

  • Dynamical effects of internal gravity waves in the equinoctial thermosphere

    Erdal Yiğit;Erdal Yiğit;Alexander S. Medvedev;Alan D. Aylward;Aaron J. Ridley

  • Gravity Waves in Planetary Atmospheres: Their Effects and Parameterization in Global Circulation Models

    Alexander S. Medvedev;Erdal Yiğit

  • GPS‐TEC Observation of Gravity Waves Generated in the Ionosphere During 21 August 2017 Total Solar Eclipse

    Chinmaya Nayak;Erdal Yiğit

  • Influence of parameterized small-scale gravity waves on the migrating diurnal tide in Earth's thermosphere

    Erdal Yiğit;Alexander S. Medvedev

  • Simultaneous Observations of Atmospheric Tides from Combined in Situ and Remote Observations at Mars from the MAVEN Spacecraft

    Scott L. England;Guiping Liu;Paul Withers;Erdal Yiğit

  • Estimates of gravity wave drag on Mars: Indication of a possible lower thermospheric wind reversal

    Alexander S. Medvedev;Erdal Yiğit;Paul Hartogh

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander S. Medvedev
Alexander S. Medvedev Max Planck Society
Mehdi Benna
Mehdi Benna Goddard Space Flight Center
Bruce M. Jakosky
Bruce M. Jakosky University of Colorado Boulder
Paul R. Mahaffy
Paul R. Mahaffy Goddard Space Flight Center
Stephen W. Bougher
Stephen W. Bougher University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Aaron J. Ridley
Aaron J. Ridley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark B. Moldwin
Mark B. Moldwin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Daniel R. Marsh
Daniel R. Marsh National Center for Atmospheric Research
William E. McClintock
William E. McClintock University of Colorado Boulder
Dieter Bilitza
Dieter Bilitza George Mason University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various related fields that complement your knowledge and expand career opportunities. For those seeking advanced practice in social fields alongside environmental concerns, exploring the cheapest online dsw programs offers an affordable pathway to leadership roles in community and policy development.

If a flexible and interdisciplinary approach is more appealing, earning a degree through the most affordable online general studies degree programs can provide broad foundational skills while allowing focus on environmental topics. This choice is ideal for those balancing multiple priorities.

Some students may prefer degrees with a lighter academic load, making the easiest bachelors degree options worth considering. These programs can offer a more manageable path to obtaining a degree while gaining essential knowledge applicable in environmental careers.

For specialized scientific study, the online geology degree can be a perfect match, combining geology principles with environmental science to prepare graduates for roles in natural resource management and environmental consulting.

Best Scientists Citing Erdal Yiğit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles