World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Edoardo Cremonese

Edoardo Cremonese

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
7105
World Ranking
7668
National Ranking
163

Edoardo Cremonese publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edoardo Cremonese sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 133 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Edoardo Cremonese D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edoardo Cremonese sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edoardo Cremonese is affiliated with the CIMA Research Foundation in Italy. Their research spans environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a particular focus on atmospheric science, global and planetary change, and interdisciplinary areas involving ecology and policy.

Their published work extensively covers several main topics: cryospheric studies and observations, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, climate change and permafrost, remote sensing in agriculture, landslides and related hazards, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, as well as meteorological phenomena and simulations.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Global Change Biology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Scientific Data
  • Earth system science data

Recent papers reflect a broad engagement with ecosystem function, climate-related data sets, and environmental measurement techniques. Selected works include:

  • "The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data" (2020) published in Scientific Data
  • "Global maps of soil temperature" (2021) published in Global Change Biology
  • "The three major axes of terrestrial ecosystem function" (2021) published in Nature
  • "Global transpiration data from sap flow measurements: the SAPFLUXNET database" (2021) published in Earth system science data
  • "Sensitivity of gross primary productivity to climatic drivers during the summer drought of 2018 in Europe" (2020) published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Umberto Morra di Cella
  • Gianluca Filippa
  • Marta Galvagno
  • Simone Gabellani
  • Nina Buchmann

Best Publications

  • The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data

    Gilberto Pastorello;Carlo Trotta;Eleonora Canfora;Housen Chu

  • ECOSTRESS: NASA's Next Generation Mission to Measure Evapotranspiration From the International Space Station

    Joshua B. Fisher;Brian Lee;Adam J. Purdy;Gregory H. Halverson

  • Using digital repeat photography and eddy covariance data to model grassland phenology and photosynthetic CO2 uptake

    Mirco Migliavacca;Marta Galvagno;Edoardo Cremonese;Micol Rossini

  • Assessment of climate change effects on mountain ecosystems through a cross-site analysis in the Alps and Apennines.

    M. Rogora;L. Frate;M. L. Carranza;M. Freppaz

  • The three major axes of terrestrial ecosystem function

    Mirco Migliavacca;Talie Musavi;Miguel D. Mahecha;Jacob A. Nelson

  • Phenopix: A R package for image-based vegetation phenology

    Gianluca Filippa;Edoardo Cremonese;Mirco Migliavacca;Marta Galvagno

  • SoilTemp: A global database of near-surface temperature

    Jonas J. Lembrechts;Juha Aalto;Juha Aalto;Michael B. Ashcroft;Michael B. Ashcroft;Pieter De Frenne

  • Global transpiration data from sap flow measurements: the SAPFLUXNET database

    Rafael Poyatos;Víctor Granda;Víctor Flo;Mark A. Adams;Mark A. Adams

  • Interpreting canopy development and physiology using a European phenology camera network at flux sites

    L. Wingate;J. Ogée;E. Cremonese;G. Filippa

  • Phenology and carbon dioxide source/sink strength of a subalpine grassland in response to an exceptionally short snow season

    M. Galvagno;G. Wohlfahrt;E. Cremonese;M. Rossini

  • Remote sensing of larch phenological cycle and analysis of relationships with climate in the Alpine region

    L. Busetto;R. Colombo;Mirco Migliavacca;E. Cremonese

  • Sensitivity of gross primary productivity to climatic drivers during the summer drought of 2018 in Europe

    Zheng Fu;Philippe Ciais;Ana Bastos;Paul C. Stoy;Paul C. Stoy

  • Remote sensing-based estimation of gross primary production in a subalpine grassland

    M. Rossini;S. Cogliati;M. Meroni;Mirco Migliavacca

  • NDVI derived from near-infrared-enabled digital cameras: Applicability across different plant functional types

    Gianluca Filippa;Edoardo Cremonese;Mirco Migliavacca;Marta Galvagno

  • Uncovering the critical soil moisture thresholds of plant water stress for European ecosystems

    Unknown

  • Brief communication : "An inventory of permafrost evidence for the European Alps"

    E. Cremonese;S. Gruber;M. Phillips;P. Pogliotti

  • The tempo of greening in the European Alps: Spatial variations on a common theme

    Philippe Choler;Arthur Bayle;Bradley Z. Carlson;Christophe Randin

  • Interpreting canopy development and physiology using the EUROPhen camera network at flux sites

    Lisa Wingate;Jerome Ogée;Edoardo Cremonese;Gianluca Filippa

  • Using digital camera images to analyse snowmelt and phenology of a subalpine grassland

    Tommaso Julitta;Edoardo Cremonese;Mirco Migliavacca;Roberto Colombo

  • Towards long-term standardised carbon and greenhouse gas observations for monitoring Europe's terrestrial ecosystems: a review

    Daniela Franz;Manuel Acosta;Núria Altimir;Nicola Arriga

  • Saharan dust events in the European Alps: role in snowmelt and geochemical characterization

    Biagio Di Mauro;Roberto Garzonio;Micol Rossini;Gianluca Filippa

  • Using Near-Infrared-Enabled Digital Repeat Photography to Track Structural and Physiological Phenology in Mediterranean Tree–Grass Ecosystems

    Yunpeng Luo;Tarek S. El-Madany;Gianluca Filippa;Xuanlong Ma

  • European larch phenology in the Alps: can we grasp the role of ecological factors by combining field observations and inverse modelling?

    Mirco Migliavacca;E. Cremonese;R. Colombo;L. Busetto

Frequent Co-Authors

Mirco Migliavacca
Mirco Migliavacca Joint Research Centre
Roberto Colombo
Roberto Colombo University of Milano-Bicocca
Andrew D. Richardson
Andrew D. Richardson Northern Arizona University
Georg Wohlfahrt
Georg Wohlfahrt University of Innsbruck
Ankur R. Desai
Ankur R. Desai University of Wisconsin–Madison
Leonardo Montagnani
Leonardo Montagnani Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Alexander Knohl
Alexander Knohl University of Göttingen
Markus Reichstein
Markus Reichstein Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in exploring Environmental Sciences further, there are several related online degrees that offer flexible and affordable options. Students seeking budget-friendly education may consider the cheapest online general studies degree programs, which provide a broad foundation useful in various environmental fields.

Additionally, some learners prefer programs that balance academic rigor with accessibility. Exploring what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help guide decisions towards degrees that match a student’s learning style and career goals.

More specialized pathways include online degrees in geoscience and geology, which delve deeper into earth systems and processes. The geoscience online degree programs are excellent for those wanting focused training that supports careers in natural resource management and environmental consulting.

For advanced expertise, particularly in spatial analysis and environmental planning, pursuing top graduate options is key. Prospective students should explore the top GIS masters programs to gain cutting-edge skills in geographic information systems — a critical tool in modern environmental sciences careers.

Best Scientists Citing Edoardo Cremonese

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles