World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Koen Hufkens

Koen Hufkens

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 41 7641 7341 103 97 112 7617

Koen Hufkens publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Koen Hufkens between 2008 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Koen Hufkens published across 19 years, from 2008 to 2026, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2018. 17 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2018. 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 5 publications
2008 2026

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Koen Hufkens: publications per year, 2008 to 2026
Year Publications
2008 2
2009 2
2010 5
2011 3
2012 11
2013 7
2014 10
2015 4
2016 4
2017 6
2018 21
2019 13
2020 5
2021 9
2022 16
2023 20
2024 8
2025 12
2026 5
Total 163
Download as CSV

Koen Hufkens publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Koen Hufkens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 112 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541 112
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Koen Hufkens D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Koen Hufkens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343 41
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Koen Hufkens is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and works primarily in the field of Environmental Science. Their research spans several subfields, including Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling, Atmospheric Science, and Environmental Engineering.

Their academic output includes numerous publications focusing on topics such as Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications, Cryospheric studies and observations, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, and Animal Behavior and Reproduction.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Andrew D. Richardson, Elizabeth Kearsley, Christoph M. Meier, Pedro Henriques, and Gonçalo Elias.

Koen Hufkens has contributed to several notable publication venues. The main journals and platforms where their work appears frequently are Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), New Phytologist, Global Change Biology, and Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • Calibrating vegetation phenology from Sentinel-2 using eddy covariance, PhenoCam, and PEP725 networks across Europe (2021, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • Seasonal variation in the canopy color of temperate evergreen conifer forests (2020, New Phytologist)
  • Asymmetric responses of ecosystem productivity to rainfall anomalies vary inversely with mean annual rainfall over the conterminous United States (2020, Global Change Biology)
  • Pan-Arctic soil moisture control on tundra carbon sequestration and plant productivity (2022, Global Change Biology)
  • Predicting spring green-up across diverse North American grasslands (2022, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology)

Best Publications

  • Digital repeat photography for phenological research in forest ecosystems

    Oliver Sonnentag;Oliver Sonnentag;Koen Hufkens;Cory Teshera-Sterne;Adam M. Young

  • Tracking vegetation phenology across diverse North American biomes using PhenoCam imagery.

    Andrew D. Richardson;Koen Hufkens;Thomas E. Milliman;Donald M. Aubrecht

  • Above-ground biomass and structure of 260 African tropical forests.

    Simon L. Lewis;Simon L. Lewis;Bonaventure Sonké;Terry Sunderland;Serge K. Begne;Serge K. Begne

  • Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery

    Stephen Klosterman;Koen Hufkens;Koen Hufkens;J. M. Gray;E. Melaas

  • Ecosystem warming extends vegetation activity but heightens vulnerability to cold temperatures

    Andrew D. Richardson;Andrew D. Richardson;Koen Hufkens;Thomas Milliman;Donald M. Aubrecht

  • Linking near-surface and satellite remote sensing measurements of deciduous broadleaf forest phenology

    Koen Hufkens;Mark Friedl;Oliver Sonnentag;Bobby H. Braswell

  • Ecological impacts of a widespread frost event following early spring leaf-out

    Koen Hufkens;Mark A. Friedl;Trevor F. Keenan;Oliver Sonnentag;Oliver Sonnentag

  • Terrestrial biosphere model performance for inter‐annual variability of land‐atmosphere CO2 exchange

    T.F. Keenan;Ian Baker;Alan Barr;Philippe Ciais

  • An integrated phenology modelling framework in r

    Koen Hufkens;Koen Hufkens;Koen Hufkens;David Basler;Tom Milliman;Eli K. Melaas

  • Satellite-observed pantropical carbon dynamics

    Lei Fan;Lei Fan;Jean-Pierre Wigneron;Philippe Ciais;Jérôme Chave

  • Tracking forest phenology and seasonal physiology using digital repeat photography: a critical assessment

    T. F. Keenan;T. F. Keenan;B. Darby;E. Felts;O. Sonnentag;O. Sonnentag

  • Productivity of North American grasslands is increased under future climate scenarios despite rising aridity

    Koen Hufkens;Trevor F. Keenan;Lawrence B. Flanagan;Russell L. Scott

  • Tracking vegetation phenology across diverse biomes using Version 2.0 of the PhenoCam Dataset.

    Bijan Seyednasrollah;Bijan Seyednasrollah;Adam M. Young;Koen Hufkens;Koen Hufkens;Tom Milliman

  • Greenness indices from digital cameras predict the timing and seasonal dynamics of canopy-scale photosynthesis.

    Michael Toomey;Mark A. Friedl;Steve Frolking;Koen Hufkens

  • Using data from Landsat, MODIS, VIIRS and PhenoCams to monitor the phenology of California oak/grass savanna and open grassland across spatial scales

    Yan Liu;Michael J. Hill;Xiaoyang Zhang;Zhuosen Wang;Zhuosen Wang

  • Intercomparison of phenological transition dates derived from the PhenoCam Dataset V1.0 and MODIS satellite remote sensing

    Andrew D. Richardson;Koen Hufkens;Thomas E. Milliman;Stephen E. Frolking

  • Conventional tree height–diameter relationships significantly overestimate aboveground carbon stocks in the Central Congo Basin

    Elizabeth Kearsley;Elizabeth Kearsley;Thales de Haulleville;Thales de Haulleville;Koen Hufkens;Alidé Kidimbu

  • Calibrating vegetation phenology from Sentinel-2 using eddy covariance, PhenoCam, and PEP725 networks across Europe

    Feng Tian;Feng Tian;Zhanzhang Cai;Hongxiao Jin;Hongxiao Jin;Koen Hufkens;Koen Hufkens

  • Ecotones in vegetation ecology: methodologies and definitions revisited

    Koen Hufkens;Paul Scheunders;Reinhart Ceulemans

  • NDVI derived from near-infrared-enabled digital cameras: Applicability across different plant functional types

    Gianluca Filippa;Edoardo Cremonese;Mirco Migliavacca;Marta Galvagno

  • A tale of two springs: using recent climate anomalies to characterize the sensitivity of temperate forest phenology to climate change

    Mark A Friedl;Josh M Gray;Eli K Melaas;Andrew D Richardson

  • Monitoring crop phenology using a smartphone based near-surface remote sensing approach

    Koen Hufkens;Koen Hufkens;Eli K. Melaas;Michael L. Mann;Timothy Foster

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew D. Richardson
Andrew D. Richardson Northern Arizona University
Hans Beeckman
Hans Beeckman Royal Museum for Central Africa
Oliver Sonnentag
Oliver Sonnentag University of Montreal
Hans Verbeeck
Hans Verbeeck Ghent University
Pascal Boeckx
Pascal Boeckx Ghent University
Mark A. Friedl
Mark A. Friedl Boston University
Trevor F. Keenan
Trevor F. Keenan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Dries Huygens
Dries Huygens Ghent University
Steve Frolking
Steve Frolking University of New Hampshire
Kathy Steppe
Kathy Steppe Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Programs like an accredited online bachelors in sociology offer foundational knowledge about societal impacts on the environment, essential for roles in policy and community outreach.

Advanced professionals might consider pursuing doctoral programs that balance rigorous study with practical demands. Many prefer an edd no dissertation route to accelerate their educational journey while focusing on applied knowledge.

Additionally, those holding an Education Specialist (EdS) degree can benefit from streamlined options through eds to edd bridge program pathways, designed to advance expertise in leadership and administration, often relevant in environmental education.

For social workers engaged in community and environmental advocacy, fully funded doctoral opportunities such as fully funded dsw programs can offer financial support while gaining specialized skills to tackle ecological challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Koen Hufkens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles