World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 51 2461 2220 1210 1080 134 20655

Edna Cukierman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edna Cukierman between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edna Cukierman published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 135 publications in 2023. 48 of the 341 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 135. Peak 135 publications in 2023. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 10 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 135 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 30 publications
1991 2025

341 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edna Cukierman: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 2
2000 3
2001 4
2002 5
2003 5
2004 2
2005 7
2006 2
2007 3
2008 4
2009 2
2010 7
2011 8
2012 3
2013 1
2014 10
2015 5
2016 4
2017 6
2018 6
2019 19
2020 16
2021 15
2022 13
2023 135
2024 18
2025 30
Total 341
Download as CSV

Edna Cukierman publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edna Cukierman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 134 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158 134
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Edna Cukierman D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edna Cukierman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130 51
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Edna Cukierman is affiliated with Fox Chase Cancer Center in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a particular focus on oncology.

The main fields of study for Cukierman include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these areas, their subfields of study comprise:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Cancer Research
  • Genetics

The research has centered on topics such as:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Caveolin-1 and cellular processes
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes

Edna Cukierman has published numerous papers, including the following recent works:

  • "A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated fibroblasts," 2020, Nature Reviews. Cancer
  • "Cholesterol Pathway Inhibition Induces TGF-β Signaling to Promote Basal Differentiation in Pancreatic Cancer," 2020, Cancer Cell
  • "Tumour-reprogrammed stromal BCAT1 fuels branched-chain ketoacid dependency in stromal-rich PDAC tumours," 2020, Nature Metabolism
  • "Netrin G1 Promotes Pancreatic Tumorigenesis through Cancer-Associated Fibroblast-Driven Nutritional Support and Immunosuppression," 2020, Cancer Discovery
  • "Targeting SOX10-deficient cells to reduce the dormant-invasive phenotype state in melanoma," 2022, Nature Communications

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Cukierman include:

  • Janusz Franco-Barraza
  • Ralph Francescone
  • Débora B. Vendramini-Costa
  • Igor Astsaturov
  • Tiffany Luong

Research papers by Cukierman have been published in various venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Cell
  • Cancer Discovery
  • Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension

    Edna Cukierman;Roumen Pankov;Daron R. Stevens;Kenneth M. Yamada

  • A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated fibroblasts

    Erik Sahai;Igor Astsaturov;Edna Cukierman;David G. DeNardo

  • Modeling Tissue Morphogenesis and Cancer in 3D

    Kenneth M. Yamada;Edna Cukierman

  • Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices.

    Edna Cukierman;Roumen Pankov;Kenneth M Yamada

  • Biomechanical Remodeling of the Microenvironment by Stromal Caveolin-1 Favors Tumor Invasion and Metastasis

    Jacky G. Goetz;Susana Minguet;Inmaculada Navarro-Lérida;Juan José Lazcano

  • Integrin Dynamics and Matrix Assembly: Tensin-Dependent Translocation of α5β1 Integrins Promotes Early Fibronectin Fibrillogenesis

    Roumen Pankov;Edna Cukierman;Ben-Zion Katz;Kazue Matsumoto

  • A Rac switch regulates random versus directionally persistent cell migration.

    Roumen Pankov;Yukinori Endo;Sharona Even-Ram;Masaru Araki

  • The ARF1 GTPase-activating protein: zinc finger motif and Golgi complex localization

    Unknown

  • FAP-overexpressing fibroblasts produce an extracellular matrix that enhances invasive velocity and directionality of pancreatic cancer cells

    Unknown

  • Remodeling of the Collagen Matrix in Aging Skin Promotes Melanoma Metastasis and Affects Immune Cell Motility

    Amanpreet Kaur;Amanpreet Kaur;Amanpreet Kaur;Brett L. Ecker;Stephen M. Douglass;Curtis H. Kugel

  • Biomechanical and biochemical remodeling of stromal extracellular matrix in cancer

    Unknown

  • Stroma-derived three-dimensional matrices are necessary and sufficient to promote desmoplastic differentiation of normal fibroblasts.

    Michael D. Amatangelo;Daniel E. Bassi;Andrés J.P. Klein-Szanto;Edna Cukierman

  • Stromagenesis: the changing face of fibroblastic microenvironments during tumor progression.

    Unknown

  • Dimensions and dynamics in integrin function

    K.M. Yamada;R. Pankov;E. Cukierman;E. Cukierman

  • The functional interplay between EGFR overexpression, hTERT activation, and p53 mutation in esophageal epithelial cells with activation of stromal fibroblasts induces tumor development, invasion, and differentiation

    Takaomi Okawa;Carmen Z. Michaylira;Jiri Kalabis;Douglas B. Stairs

  • Preparation of Extracellular Matrices Produced by Cultured and Primary Fibroblasts

    Unknown

  • The KDEL receptor, ERD2, regulates intracellular traffic by recruiting a GTPase-activating protein for ARF1.

    Tomohiko Aoe;Edna Cukierman;Agnes Lee;Dan Cassel

  • uPARAP/Endo180 is essential for cellular uptake of collagen and promotes fibroblast collagen adhesion

    Lars H. Engelholm;Karin List;Karin List;Sarah Netzel-Arnett;Edna Cukierman

  • Fibroblast-derived 3D matrix differentially regulates the growth and drug-responsiveness of human cancer cells

    Ilya Serebriiskii;Remedios Castelló-Cros;Acacia Lamb;Erica A. Golemis

  • Stromal dynamic reciprocity in cancer: intricacies of fibroblastic-ECM interactions.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth M. Yamada
Kenneth M. Yamada National Institutes of Health
Andres J. P. Klein-Szanto
Andres J. P. Klein-Szanto Fox Chase Cancer Center
Bruce J. Baum
Bruce J. Baum National Institutes of Health
Erica A. Golemis
Erica A. Golemis Fox Chase Cancer Center
David J. Mooney
David J. Mooney Harvard University
Wafik S. El-Deiry
Wafik S. El-Deiry Brown University
Klaus M. Hahn
Klaus M. Hahn University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Robert G. Uzzo
Robert G. Uzzo Fox Chase Cancer Center
Vivek B. Shenoy
Vivek B. Shenoy University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology often leads to careers across research, healthcare, and advanced medical fields. Many professionals consider related healthcare routes, such as nursing or advanced practice roles, which can be pursued through flexible online programs. For example, those interested in psychiatric healthcare roles may look into the dnp psychiatric nurse practitioner salary across different states to assess earning potential and demand.

Time and educational flexibility are key issues to consider. Aspiring nurse practitioners frequently ask how many years to become a nurse practitioner to plan the fastest route to their career goals. For those already holding an RN license, accelerated options like an rn to bsn in 6 months program can quickly boost credentials.

If you have an associate's degree and want to advance, asn to fnp programs offer a direct path to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner. These online and bridge programs provide flexible and efficient avenues to expand your scientific knowledge and open doors to dynamic careers alongside or beyond molecular biology.

Best Scientists Citing Edna Cukierman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles