World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
12851
World Ranking
11952
National Ranking
108

Doris Marko publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Doris Marko sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 235 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Doris Marko D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Doris Marko sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Doris Marko is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria, focusing on research that intersects agricultural sciences, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Their work broadly encompasses the study of mycotoxins in agriculture and food, carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment, as well as insect and pesticide research.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their subfield specializations include Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Food Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Cancer Research.

Recent publications by Doris Marko include the following papers:

  • Risk assessment of aflatoxins in food (2020) published in EFSA Journal
  • Toxicity of fluoride: critical evaluation of evidence for human developmental neurotoxicity in epidemiological studies, animal experiments and in vitro analyses (2020) published in Archives of Toxicology
  • Alternaria toxins-Still emerging? (2021) published in Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
  • Exposure to Mycotoxin-Mixtures via Breast Milk: An Ultra-Sensitive LC-MS/MS Biomonitoring Approach (2020) published in Frontiers in Chemistry
  • Natural contaminants in infant food: The case of regulated and emerging mycotoxins (2020) published in Food Control

The following co-authors frequently collaborate with Marko:

  • Giorgia Del Favero
  • Elisabeth Varga
  • Benedikt Warth
  • Francesco Crudo
  • Georg Aichinger

They regularly publish in several scientific venues, most notably:

  • Archives of Toxicology
  • Toxicology Letters
  • Toxins
  • Chemical Research in Toxicology
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology

Key research topics pursued include:

  • Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
  • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Potato Plant Research
  • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

The research outputs and collaborations of Doris Marko demonstrate a sustained focus on understanding the presence and impacts of natural contaminants and toxins in food systems, with an emphasis on toxicological evaluation and safety assessment. The scientist's publication record spans across multiple high-impact journals within toxicology and food safety disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Indirubins Inhibit Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3β and CDK5/P25, Two Protein Kinases Involved in Abnormal Tau Phosphorylation in Alzheimer's Disease A PROPERTY COMMON TO MOST CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE INHIBITORS?

    Sophie Leclerc;Matthieu Garnier;Ralph Hoessel;Doris Marko

  • Indirubin, the active constituent of a Chinese antileukaemia medicine, inhibits cyclin-dependent kinases.

    Ralph Hoessel;Sophie Leclerc;Jane A. Endicott;Martin E. M. Nobel

  • Risk assessment of aflatoxins in food

    Dieter Schrenk;Margherita Bignami;Laurent Bodin

  • The anthocyanidins cyanidin and delphinidin are potent inhibitors of the epidermal growth-factor receptor.

    S Meiers;M Kemény;U Weyand;R Gastpar

  • Proposal of a comprehensive definition of modified and other forms of mycotoxins including “masked” mycotoxins

    Michael Rychlik;Hans-Ulrich Humpf;Doris Marko;Sven Dänicke

  • Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) by indirubin derivatives in human tumour cells

    D Marko;S Schätzle;A Friedel;A Genzlinger

  • Nitrate and nitrite in the diet: How to assess their benefit and risk for human health

    Michael Habermeyer;Angelika Roth;Sabine Guth;Patrick Diel

  • Coffee constituents as modulators of Nrf2 nuclear translocation and ARE (EpRE)-dependent gene expression.

    Ute Boettler;Katharina Sommerfeld;Nadine Volz;Nadine Volz;Gudrun Pahlke

  • Toxicity of fluoride: critical evaluation of evidence for human developmental neurotoxicity in epidemiological studies, animal experiments and in vitro analyses.

    Sabine Guth;Stephanie Hüser;Angelika Roth;Gisela Degen

  • Alternariol acts as a topoisomerase poison, preferentially affecting the IIα isoform

    Markus Fehr;Gudrun Pahlke;Jessica Fritz;Morten O. Christensen

  • Inhibitor Binding to Active and Inactive CDK2: The Crystal Structure of CDK2-Cyclin A/Indirubin-5-Sulphonate

    Thomas G. Davies;Paul Tunnah;Laurent Meijer;Doris Marko

  • Cellular uptake of platinum nanoparticles in human colon carcinoma cells and their impact on cellular redox systems and DNA integrity.

    Joanna Pelka;Helge Gehrke;Melanie Esselen;Michael Türk

  • TDP1 Overexpression in Human Cells Counteracts DNA Damage Mediated by Topoisomerases I and II

    Hans U. Barthelmes;Michael Habermeyer;Morten O. Christensen;Christian Mielke

  • Platinum nanoparticles and their cellular uptake and DNA platination at non-cytotoxic concentrations

    Helge Gehrke;Joanna Pelka;Christian G. Hartinger;Holger Blank

  • Structure–Activity Relationships of Targeted RuII(η6-p-Cymene) Anticancer Complexes with Flavonol-Derived Ligands

    Andrea Kurzwernhart;Wolfgang Kandioller;Simone Bächler;Caroline Bartel

  • Targeting the DNA-topoisomerase complex in a double-strike approach with a topoisomerase inhibiting moiety and covalent DNA binder

    Andrea Kurzwernhart;Wolfgang Kandioller;Caroline Bartel;Simone Bächler

  • Do anthocyanins and anthocyanidins, cancer chemopreventive pigments in the diet, merit development as potential drugs?

    Sarah Thomasset;Nicole Teller;Hong Cai;Doris Marko

  • Methoxy-Substituted 3-Formyl-2-phenylindoles Inhibit Tubulin Polymerization

    R. Gastpar;M. Goldbrunner;D. Marko;E. von Angerer

  • The substitution pattern of anthocyanidins affects different cellular signaling cascades regulating cell proliferation.

    Doris Marko;Nicole Puppel;Zeina Tjaden;Sandra Jakobs

  • Inhibitors of Leishmania mexicana CRK3 Cyclin-Dependent Kinase: Chemical Library Screen and Antileishmanial Activity

    Karen M. Grant;Morag H. Dunion;Vanessa Yardley;Alexios-Leandros Skaltsounis

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerhard Eisenbrand
Gerhard Eisenbrand Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Veronika Somoza
Veronika Somoza University of Vienna
Thomas Hofmann
Thomas Hofmann Technical University of Munich
Laurent Meijer
Laurent Meijer Perha Pharmaceuticals
Dagmar Gerthsen
Dagmar Gerthsen Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Elke Richling
Elke Richling Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Hans-Ulrich Humpf
Hans-Ulrich Humpf University of Münster
Chiara Dall’Asta
Chiara Dall’Asta University of Parma
Lyn R. Griffiths
Lyn R. Griffiths Queensland University of Technology
Christian G. Hartinger
Christian G. Hartinger University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a diverse range of online degree programs and health science careers. Many students consider pathways in growing fields such as health information management, nutrition, medical technology, and radiology. These programs blend scientific knowledge with practical skills highly valued in healthcare settings.

For those interested in data-driven roles, an online health information management degree can lead to career opportunities in medical records and clinical data analysis. Nutrition science is another popular option, and earning a nutrition masters online supports roles in wellness consulting, public health, and dietetics.

Students with a passion for diagnostic technology can pursue online ultrasound tech programs, preparing for work in sonography across hospitals and clinics. Similarly, an accelerated radiology tech programs online provides a fast-track to imaging careers, meeting the growing need for skilled professionals in radiologic technology.

Exploring these online degree options alongside Biology and Biochemistry studies can expand your professional horizons and position you for success in today’s health and science landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Doris Marko

Trending Scientists