World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Guillermina Font

Guillermina Font

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 74 4853 4411 133 126 275 14417

Guillermina Font publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Guillermina Font between 1987 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Guillermina Font published across 38 years, from 1987 to 2024, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2015. 5 of the 292 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2015. 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 1 publication
1987 2024

292 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Guillermina Font: publications per year, 1987 to 2024
Year Publications
1987 3
1988 2
1989 1
1990 4
1991 2
1992 1
1993 4
1994 7
1995 5
1996 6
1997 4
1998 0
1999 3
2000 8
2001 10
2002 7
2003 3
2004 9
2005 5
2006 5
2007 6
2008 7
2009 9
2010 18
2011 13
2012 18
2013 20
2014 16
2015 21
2016 19
2017 13
2018 10
2019 3
2020 6
2021 13
2022 6
2023 4
2024 1
Total 292
Download as CSV

Guillermina Font publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guillermina Font sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 275 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979 275
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Guillermina Font D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guillermina Font sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501 74
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Guillermina Font is affiliated with the University of Valencia in Spain and has developed a research portfolio centered primarily on mycotoxins and their effects in agricultural and food contexts. Their work spans multiple disciplines including agricultural and biological sciences as well as biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their research outputs cover a range of topics such as:

  • Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
  • Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
  • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Potato Plant Research

Scientific publications by Guillermina Font have appeared frequently in the following venues:

  • Food and Chemical Toxicology
  • Free Radical Biology and Medicine
  • Toxins
  • Foods
  • Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Toxicity of mycotoxins in vivo on vertebrate organisms: A review," 2020, Food and Chemical Toxicology
  • "In vitro and in vivo assessment of AFB1 and OTA toxic effects and the beneficial role of bioactive compounds. A systematic review," 2024, Food Chemistry
  • "Oxidative stress, glutathione, and gene expression as key indicators in SH-SY5Y cells exposed to zearalenone metabolites and beauvericin," 2020, Toxicology Letters
  • "In silico methods for metabolomic and toxicity prediction of zearalenone, α-zearalenone and β-zearalenone," 2020, Food and Chemical Toxicology
  • "Individual and Combined Effect of Zearalenone Derivates and Beauvericin Mycotoxins on SH-SY5Y Cells," 2020, Toxins

Frequent collaborators in Guillermina Font's research include:

  • Lara Manyes, with 20 joint publications
  • Alessandra Cimbalo, with 13 joint publications
  • Massimo Frangiamone, with 11 joint publications
  • Manuel Alonso-Garrido, with 9 joint publications
  • Manuel Lozano, with 9 joint publications

The subfields most represented in their work are:

  • Plant Science
  • Molecular Biology
  • Food Science
  • Cancer Research
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

The scientist's focus is on understanding toxicological impacts of agricultural contaminants at molecular and cellular levels, utilizing both experimental and computational methods. Their body of work contributes to multiple areas of food safety, toxicity assessment, and plant genetics.

Best Publications

  • In vivo toxicity studies of fusarium mycotoxins in the last decade: a review.

    L. Escrivá;G. Font;L. Manyes

  • Environmental and food applications of LC-tandem mass spectrometry in pesticide-residue analysis: an overview.

    Yolanda Picó;Cristina Blasco;Guillermina Font

  • Current trends in solid-phase-based extraction techniques for the determination of pesticides in food and environment.

    Yolanda Picó;Mónica Fernández;Maria Jose Ruiz;Guillermina Font

  • Solid-phase extraction in multi-residue pesticide analysis of water

    G. Font;J. Mañes;J.C. Moltó;Y. Picó

  • Comparison of solid-phase microextraction and stir bar sorptive extraction for determining six organophosphorus insecticides in honey by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

    C Blasco;M Fernández;Y Picó;G Font

  • Comparison of microextraction procedures to determine pesticides in oranges by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

    C Blasco;G Font;Y Picó

  • Reactive oxygen species induced by beauvericin, patulin and zearalenone in CHO-K1 cells.

    E. Ferrer;A. Juan-García;G. Font;M.J. Ruiz

  • Mycotoxins and their consequences in aquaculture: A review

    Amanda Anater;Lara Manyes;Giuseppe Meca;Emilia Ferrer

  • Control of pesticide residues by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to ensure food safety

    Yolanda Picó;Guillermina Font;María José Ruiz;Mónica Fernández

  • Assessment of pesticide residues in honey samples from portugal and Spain.

    Cristina Blasco;Mónica Fernández;Angelina Pena;Celeste Lino

  • Co-occurrence and risk assessment of mycotoxins in food and diet from Mediterranean area

    A.B. Serrano;G. Font;M.J. Ruiz;E. Ferrer

  • Toxicity of mycotoxins in vivo on vertebrate organisms: A review.

    A. Cimbalo;M. Alonso-Garrido;G. Font;L. Manyes

  • Pesticide residue determination in fruit and vegetables by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

    Y Picó;G Font;J.C Moltó;J Mañes

  • Simultaneous determination of eight underivatised biogenic amines in fish by solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

    G. Sagratini;M. Fernández-Franzón;F. De Berardinis;G. Font

  • Surveillance of pesticide residues in fruits from Valencia during twenty months (2004/05)

    H. Berrada;M. Fernández;M.J. Ruiz;J.C. Moltó

  • Simultaneous determination of bisphenol A, octylphenol, and nonylphenol by pressurised liquid extraction and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in powdered milk and infant formulas

    Emilia Ferrer;Elisa Santoni;Sauro Vittori;Guillermina Font

  • Pressurized liquid extraction combined with capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry as an improved methodology for the determination of sulfonamide residues in meat.

    Guillermina Font;Ana Juan-García;Yolanda Picó

  • In vitro mechanisms of Beauvericin toxicity: A review.

    Beatriz Mallebrera;Alessandra Prosperini;Guillermina Font;María José Ruiz

  • Capillary electrophoresis for analyzing pesticides in fruits and vegetables using solid-phase extraction and stir-bar sorptive extraction.

    Ana Juan-García;Yolanda Picó;Guillermina Font

  • Determination of dithiocarbamates and metabolites in plants by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

    C Blasco;G Font;Y Picó

  • Alternaria Mycotoxins in Food and Feed: An Overview

    Laura Escrivá;Souheib Oueslati;Guillermina Font;Lara Manyes

Frequent Co-Authors

Jordi Mañes
Jordi Mañes University of Valencia
Yolanda Picó
Yolanda Picó University of Valencia
Juan Carlos Moltó
Juan Carlos Moltó University of Valencia
Sauro Vittori
Sauro Vittori University of Camerino
José Miguel Soriano
José Miguel Soriano University of Valencia
Vicent Yusà
Vicent Yusà University of Valencia
Angelina Pena
Angelina Pena University of Coimbra
Celeste M. Lino
Celeste M. Lino University of Coimbra
Rafael Rodríguez
Rafael Rodríguez University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Filippo Maggi
Filippo Maggi University of Camerino

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens diverse career pathways, many of which can be pursued through specialized online degrees. For those interested in blending science with business, becoming a pharmaceutical sales rep salary offers attractive earning potentials and dynamic roles that require strong product knowledge and communication skills.

If a healthcare profession is your goal, learning how do you become a pharmacist can be invaluable. Pharmacists play a crucial role in medication management and patient care, combining a robust chemistry foundation with clinical expertise.

For those fascinated by forensic science, becoming a forensic autopsy technician can be a compelling choice. This role requires detailed knowledge of biology and chemistry to assist in determining causes of death.

Many aspiring forensic professionals seek affordable educational options. Exploring the cheapest online forensic science degree programs can help balance cost with quality, making it easier to advance your career without financial strain.

Best Scientists Citing Guillermina Font

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles