World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
50243
World Ranking
10495
National Ranking
4554

Dominic A. Scudiero publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominic A. Scudiero sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 116 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Dominic A. Scudiero D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominic A. Scudiero sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dominic A. Scudiero is affiliated with Science Applications International Corporation in the United States. Their professional work is situated within this organization, which is known for involvement in scientific research and applied technology development.

There is no available data on specific research papers authored by Dominic A. Scudiero, which limits insight into the detailed scope of their academic contributions and publication record.

No information is provided regarding frequent co-authors or collaborative networks, so the collaborative aspects of their research remain unspecified.

The record lacks details on frequent publication venues, which could have otherwise offered an understanding of their preferred scholarly forums for disseminating research findings.

Information about book publications, including publishers and the number of works, is not present, so it cannot be determined whether they have contributed to academic or professional books.

Details about main and subfields of study are not available. Consequently, the specific scientific domains and disciplines in which they have concentrated their research are unspecified.

Similarly, no data on main topics of work can be identified, leaving the key thematic areas or subject matters of their scientific inquiry unclear.

There is no record of awards or recognitions associated with Dominic A. Scudiero, which would have indicated formal acknowledgment within the scientific community.

The scientist is not deceased, so their career and affiliations are considered current.

Best Publications

  • New Colorimetric Cytotoxicity Assay for Anticancer-Drug Screening

    Philip Skehan;Ritsa Storeng;Dominic Scudiero;Anne Monks

  • Feasibility of a High-Flux Anticancer Drug Screen Using a Diverse Panel of Cultured Human Tumor Cell Lines

    Anne Monks;Dominic Scudiero;Philip Skehan;Robert Shoemaker

  • Feasibility of Drug Screening with Panels of Human Tumor Cell Lines Using a Microculture Tetrazolium Assay

    Michael C. Alley;Dominic A. Scudiero;Anne Monks;Miriam L. Hursey

  • Evaluation of a Soluble Tetrazolium/Formazan Assay for Cell Growth and Drug Sensitivity in Culture Using Human and Other Tumor Cell Lines

    Dominic A. Scudiero;Robert H. Shoemaker;Kenneth D. Paull;Anne Monks

  • IAP-Family Protein Survivin Inhibits Caspase Activity and Apoptosis Induced by Fas (CD95), Bax, Caspases, and Anticancer Drugs

    Ingo Tamm;Yan Wang;Ed Sausville;Dominic A. Scudiero

  • A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer

    Uwe Scherf;Douglas T. Ross;Mark Waltham;Lawrence H. Smith

  • An Information-Intensive Approach to the Molecular Pharmacology of Cancer

    John N. Weinstein;Timothy G. Myers;Patrick M. O'Connor;Stephen H. Friend

  • Display and Analysis of Patterns of Differential Activity of Drugs Against Human Tumor Cell Lines: Development of Mean Graph and COMPARE Algorithm

    K. D. Paull;R. H. Shoemaker;L. Hodes;A. Monks

  • Characterization of the p53 Tumor Suppressor Pathway in Cell Lines of the National Cancer Institute Anticancer Drug Screen and Correlations with the Growth-Inhibitory Potency of 123 Anticancer Agents

    Patrick M. O'Connor;Joany Jackman;Insoo Bae;Timothy G. Myers

  • Comparison of In Vitro Anticancer-Drug-Screening Data Generated With a Tetrazolium Assay Versus a Protein Assay Against a Diverse Panel of Human Tumor Cell Lines

    L. V. Rubinstein;R. H. Shoemaker;K. D. Paull;R. M. Simon

  • Tetrazolium-based Assays for Cellular Viability: A Critical Examination of Selected Parameters Affecting Formazan Production

    David T. Vistica;Philip Skehan;Dominic Scudiero;Anne Monks

  • Expression and Prognostic Significance of IAP-Family Genes in Human Cancers and Myeloid Leukemias

    Ingo Tamm;Steven M. Kornblau;Harry Segall;Stanislaw Krajewski

  • Identification of Small Molecule Inhibitors of Hypoxia-inducible Factor 1 Transcriptional Activation Pathway

    Annamaria Rapisarda;Badarch Uranchimeg;Dominic A. Scudiero;Mike Selby

  • Small-molecule antagonists of apoptosis suppressor XIAP exhibit broad antitumor activity.

    Aaron D. Schimmer;Kate Welsh;Clemencia Pinilla;Zhiliang Wang

  • An Informatics Approach Identifying Markers of Chemosensitivity in Human Cancer Cell Lines

    Sally A. Amundson;Timothy G. Myers;Dominic Scudiero;Shinichi Kitada

  • Identification of PDGFR as a receptor for AAV-5 transduction

    Giovanni Di Pasquale;Beverly L Davidson;Colleen S Stein;Inês Martins

  • Defective repair of alkylated DNA by human tumour and SV40-transformed human cell strains

    Rufus S. Day;Chuck H. J. Ziolkowski;Dominic A. Scudiero;Sharon A. Meyer

  • Transcript and protein expression profiles of the NCI-60 cancer cell panel: an integromic microarray study

    Uma T. Shankavaram;William C. Reinhold;Satoshi Nishizuka;Sylvia Major

  • Karyotypic Complexity of the NCI-60 Drug-Screening Panel

    Anna V. Roschke;Giovanni Tonon;Kristen S. Gehlhaus;Nicolas McTyre

  • Expression and location of Hsp70/Hsc-binding anti-apoptotic protein BAG-1 and its variants in normal tissues and tumor cell lines.

    Shinichi Takayama;Stanislaw Krajewski;Maryla Krajewska;Shinichi Kitada

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert H. Shoemaker
Robert H. Shoemaker National Institutes of Health
John N. Weinstein
John N. Weinstein The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Albert J. Fornace
Albert J. Fornace Georgetown University
Michael R. Boyd
Michael R. Boyd University of South Alabama
John H. Cardellina
John H. Cardellina Montana State University
Yves Pommier
Yves Pommier National Institutes of Health
Timothy G. Myers
Timothy G. Myers National Institutes of Health
Peter M. Schlag
Peter M. Schlag Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Michael R. Boyd
Michael R. Boyd National Cancer Institute
John C. Reed
John C. Reed Johnson & Johnson (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a variety of health and science careers. Many students pursue further specialized training online to expand their opportunities. For nursing professionals aiming for psychiatric specialties, the fastest pmhnp program can significantly shorten the path to becoming a Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner.

Similarly, nurses seeking advanced roles may benefit from the cheapest post master's fnp program, offering a cost-effective way to qualify as a Family Nurse Practitioner. For those passionate about nutrition, a dietitian degree online provides flexibility and supports career growth in health and wellness.

Registered Nurses can advance their careers with online rn to bsn programs that are accessible and focused on working professionals. These options highlight how online education can support those with a background in Biology and Biochemistry to diversify or specialize their career pathways within the growing healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Dominic A. Scudiero

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles