World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
65
Citations
16026
World Ranking
9107
National Ranking
4044

Diana R. Tomchick publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana R. Tomchick sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 291 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Diana R. Tomchick D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana R. Tomchick sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Enzyme
  • Gene
  • Amino acid

Her primary areas of study are Cell biology, Protein structure, Biochemistry, Stereochemistry and Biophysics. She has researched Cell biology in several fields, including Mad2, Mitotic checkpoint complex, CDC20 and Mad2 Proteins. Her Protein structure research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Clathrin, Peptide sequence, Actin, Ankyrin repeat and Binding site.

Her work on Demethylase, Ankyrin and Arabidopsis as part of general Biochemistry research is often related to Histone methylation and L1 family, thus linking different fields of science. Her Stereochemistry research incorporates themes from Oxidoreductase, Amidophosphoribosyltransferase, Penicillin amidase, Cysteine and Nucleophile. In general Biophysics, her work in Molecular motor and Myosin is often linked to MYL2, Smooth Muscle Myosins and Meromyosin linking many areas of study.

Her most cited work include:

  • Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor (1744 citations)
  • Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor (1744 citations)
  • A protein catalytic framework with an N-terminal nucleophile is capable of self-activation (530 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Diana R. Tomchick mostly deals with Biochemistry, Cell biology, Biophysics, Protein structure and Stereochemistry. Diana R. Tomchick connects Biochemistry with Treponema in her research. Her Cell biology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Spindle checkpoint and Mad2.

Her Biophysics study incorporates themes from Membrane, Synaptotagmins and Synaptotagmin 1. Her Protein structure research incorporates elements of Histidine kinase, Peptide sequence, Molecular biology and Actin. As part of the same scientific family, Diana R. Tomchick usually focuses on Stereochemistry, concentrating on Decarboxylation and intersecting with Cofactor.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Biochemistry (41.61%)
  • Cell biology (27.95%)
  • Biophysics (23.60%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Cell biology (27.95%)
  • Biophysics (23.60%)
  • Effector (7.45%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Diana R. Tomchick focuses on Cell biology, Biophysics, Effector, Biochemistry and Pore complex. Many of her studies on Cell biology apply to Protein AMPylation as well. Her Cryo-electron microscopy study in the realm of Biophysics connects with subjects such as High resolution.

The concepts of her Effector study are interwoven with issues in Transport protein, Protein subunit and Protein kinase A. Diana R. Tomchick works mostly in the field of Protein kinase A, limiting it down to topics relating to Kinase activity and, in certain cases, Structural biology, Protein phosphorylation, Allosteric regulation and Peptide sequence. Her work on Enzyme structure, Binding site and Heterotetramer is typically connected to Deoxyhypusine synthase and Eukaryotic initiation factor as part of general Biochemistry study, connecting several disciplines of science.

Between 2017 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Protein AMPylation by an Evolutionarily Conserved Pseudokinase. (73 citations)
  • Bacterial pseudokinase catalyzes protein polyglutamylation to inhibit the SidE-family ubiquitin ligases (52 citations)
  • Molecular Discrimination between Two Conformations of Sphingomyelin in Plasma Membranes. (49 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Enzyme
  • Gene
  • Amino acid

Her scientific interests lie mostly in Cell biology, Point mutation, Chaperone, Biochemistry and Membrane. Her work on Protein kinase A, Phosphorylation and Kinase as part of general Cell biology study is frequently linked to Karyopherin, bridging the gap between disciplines. Her Point mutation research includes elements of Drug resistance and Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase.

Her work on EIF5A, Trypanosoma brucei and Heterotetramer as part of general Biochemistry study is frequently connected to Hypusine and Deoxyhypusine synthase, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them. Her Membrane research integrates issues from Dodecameric protein, Biophysics, Cryo-electron microscopy and Protein family. Her research integrates issues of Cholesterol and Intracellular in her study of Biophysics.

Best Publications

  • Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor

    Ivan Rayment;Wojciech R. Rypniewski;Karen Schmidt-Bäse;Karen Schmidt-Bäse;Robert Smith

  • A protein catalytic framework with an N-terminal nucleophile is capable of self-activation

    James A. Brannigan;Guy Dodson;Guy Dodson;Helen J. Duggleby;Peter C.E. Moody;Peter C.E. Moody

  • Three-dimensional structure of the complexin/SNARE complex.

    Xiaocheng Chen;Diana R. Tomchick;Evguenii Kovrigin;Demet Araç

  • Pivotal role of water in the mechanism of P450BM-3.

    Donovan C. Haines;Diana R. Tomchick;Mischa Machius;Julian A. Peterson

  • Structural basis of actin filament nucleation and processive capping by a formin homology 2 domain

    Takanori Otomo;Diana R. Tomchick;Chinatsu Otomo;Sanjay C. Panchal

  • Structural Basis for Corest-Dependent Demethylation of Nucleosomes by the Human Lsd1 Histone Demethylase

    Maojun Yang;Christian B. Gocke;Xuelian Luo;Dominika Borek

  • A long-duration dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitor (DSM265) for prevention and treatment of malaria

    Margaret A. Phillips;Julie Lotharius;Kennan Marsh;John White

  • Structure of the photolyase-like domain of cryptochrome 1 from Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Chad A. Brautigam;Barbara S. Smith;Zhiquan Ma;Maya Palnitkar

  • Structural Basis of Rho Gtpase-Mediated Activation of the Formin Mdia1

    Takanori Otomo;Chinatsu Otomo;Diana R. Tomchick;Mischa Machius

  • Artificial ligand binding within the HIF2α PAS-B domain of the HIF2 transcription factor

    Thomas H. Scheuermann;Diana R. Tomchick;Mischa Machius;Yan Guo;Yan Guo

  • Crystal structure of a 12 ANK repeat stack from human ankyrinR

    Peter Michaely;Diana R. Tomchick;Mischa Machius;Richard G.W. Anderson

  • Munc13 C2B domain is an activity-dependent Ca2+ regulator of synaptic exocytosis

    Ok Ho Shin;Jun Lu;Jun Lu;Jun Lu;Jeong Seop Rhee;Jeong Seop Rhee;Jeong Seop Rhee;Diana R. Tomchick

  • p31comet blocks Mad2 activation through structural mimicry.

    Maojun Yang;Bing Li;Diana R. Tomchick;Mischa Machius

  • Structure of Cdc42 in a complex with the GTPase-binding domain of the cell polarity protein, Par6

    Sarah M. Garrard;Christopher T. Capaldo;Lin Gao;Michael K. Rosen

  • Structural basis of histone demethylation by LSD1 revealed by suicide inactivation

    Maojun Yang;Jeffrey C Culhane;Lawrence M Szewczuk;Christian B Gocke

  • Structure of cohesin subcomplex pinpoints direct shugoshin-Wapl antagonism in centromeric cohesion

    Kodai Hara;Ge Zheng;Qianhui Qu;Hong Liu

  • Enzyme structure and dynamics affect hydrogen tunneling: The impact of a remote side chain (I553) in soybean lipoxygenase-1

    Matthew P. Meyer;Diana R. Tomchick;Judith P. Klinman

  • Structural and functional analysis of the YAP-binding domain of human TEAD2

    Wei Tian;Jianzhong Yu;Diana R. Tomchick;Duojia Pan

  • A long-duration dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitor (DSM265) for prevention and treatment of malaria

    M. A. Phillips;J. Lotharius;K. Marsh;J. White

  • Structural basis of actin filament nucleation and processive capping by a formin homology 2 domain

    D.R. Tomchick;T. Otomo;C. Otomo;S.C. Panchal

Frequent Co-Authors

Mischa Machius
Mischa Machius The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Chad A. Brautigam
Chad A. Brautigam The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Josep Rizo
Josep Rizo The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Thomas C. Südhof
Thomas C. Südhof Stanford University
Michael V. Norgard
Michael V. Norgard The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Hongtao Yu
Hongtao Yu The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Kim Orth
Kim Orth The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Michael K. Rosen
Michael K. Rosen The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Margaret A. Phillips
Margaret A. Phillips The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Christian Rosenmund
Christian Rosenmund Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Biology and Biochemistry can open up diverse career opportunities in the medical and health sciences field. For those interested in nutrition, consider enrolling in a 2 year nutrition degree online, which can provide a fast-track option toward becoming a certified nutritionist or dietitian.

For career advancement in medical management, many professionals look into the healthcare MBA cost. Earning an healthcare mba cost can lead to higher-level administrative roles in hospitals, research organizations, or biotech companies.

Students interested in data and analytics roles might benefit from pursuing medical coding certifications. If you are deciding between coding specialties, learn more about cpc vs ccs to understand differences in certifications, cost, and salary prospects.

Wondering how long does it take to become a medical coder? Fast online training programs are available, making it possible to launch your career in less than a year.

Combining a background in biology or biochemistry with one of these in-demand online degrees can enhance your career flexibility and earning potential in today’s healthcare job market.

Best Scientists Citing Diana R. Tomchick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles