World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 48 4435 2012 170 8572

David T. Purtilo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David T. Purtilo between 1969 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David T. Purtilo published across 52 years, from 1969 to 2020, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 1987. 1 of the 196 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 1987. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 5 publications 1975: 7 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 9 publications 1981: 13 publications 1982: 14 publications 1983: 11 publications 1984: 14 publications 1985: 14 publications 1986: 12 publications 1987: 22 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 13 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication
1969 2020

196 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David T. Purtilo: publications per year, 1969 to 2020
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 0
1971 1
1972 0
1973 2
1974 5
1975 7
1976 3
1977 4
1978 3
1979 5
1980 9
1981 13
1982 14
1983 11
1984 14
1985 14
1986 12
1987 22
1988 7
1989 13
1990 12
1991 8
1992 6
1993 4
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
Total 196
Download as CSV

David T. Purtilo publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. Purtilo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 162–171 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 170 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166 170
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

David T. Purtilo D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. Purtilo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175 48
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

David T. Purtilo was affiliated with the University of Nebraska Medical Center in the United States. Their academic contributions and research career were linked to this institution.

As there are no recorded recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or detailed information about their fields of study and main research topics, it is not possible to provide specifics in these areas for this profile.

The scientist was known to have passed away. The absence of detailed publication records or awards limits the elaboration on the scope and impact of their work. However, their association with a recognized medical center suggests involvement in scholarly activity connected to that environment.

Best Publications

  • Epstein-Barr virus-induced B-cell lymphoma after renal transplantation: acyclovir therapy and transition from polyclonal to monoclonal B-cell proliferation.

    D. W. Hanto;G. Frizzera;K. J. Gajl-Peczalska;K. Sakamoto

  • Clinical Spectrum of Lymphoproliferative Disorders in Renal Transplant Recipients and Evidence for the Role of Epstein-Barr Virus

    Douglas W. Hanto;Glauco Frizzera;David T. Purtilo;Kiyoshi Sakamoto

  • Deficient natural killer cell activity in x-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome

    John L. Sullivan;Kevin S. Byron;Frank E. Brewster;David T. Purtilo

  • Correlation of mutations of the SH2D1A gene and Epstein-Barr virus infection with clinical phenotype and outcome in X-linked lymphoproliferative disease

    Janos Sumegi;Dali Huang;Arpad Lanyi;Jack D. Davis

  • Variable phenotypic expression of an X-linked recessive lymphoproliferative syndrome.

    David T. Purtilo;Daniel DeFlorio;Lindsey M. Hutt;Jag Bhawan

  • Epstein-Barr virus and human diseases: recent advances in diagnosis.

    M. Okano;Geoffrey Milton Thiele;J. R. Davis;H. L. Grierson

  • Fatal strongyloidiasis in immunosuppressed patients

    David T. Purtilo;Wayne M. Meyers;Daniel H. Connor

  • Epstein-Barr virus-induced diseases in boys with the X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome (XLP): update on studies of the registry.

    David T. Purtilo;Kiyoshi Sakamoto;Vanessa Barnabei;Janet Seeley

  • The Epstein-Barr virus in the pathogenesis of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Clinical, pathologic, and virologic correlation.

    D W Hanto;K Sakamoto;D T Purtilo;R L Simmons

  • Chronic Mononucleosis Syndrome

    Richard DuBOIS;Janet Seeley;Irena Brus;Kiyoshi Sakamoto

  • Epstein-Barr virus infections in males with the X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome.

    Helen Grierson;David T. Purtilo

  • Documentation of Epstein-Barr virus infection in immunodeficient patients with life-threatening lymphoproliferative diseases by Epstein-Barr virus complementary RNA/DNA and viral DNA/DNA hybridization.

    Ari K. Saemundsen;David T. Purtilo;Kiyoshi Sakamoto;John L. Sullivan

  • Virus-associated histiocytic proliferations in children. Frequent association with Epstein-Barr virus and congenital or acquired immunodeficiencies.

    Kenneth McClain;Richard Gehrz;Helen Grierson;David Purtilo

  • Immunological bases for superior survival of females.

    David T. Purtilo;John L. Sullivan

  • X-Linked Lymphoproliferative Syndrome Registry report

    Janet K. Hamilton;Louise A. Paquin;John L. Sullivan;Helen S. Maurer

  • Immune deficiency predisposing to Epstein-Barr virus-induced lymphoproliferative diseases: the X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome as a model.

    David T. Purtilo

  • Correction of X-Linked Lymphoproliferative Disease by Transplantation of Cord-Blood Stem Cells

    Marcus R. Vowels;Reg Lam-Po-Tang;Vasili Berdoukas;David Ford

  • Immune deficiency in the X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome. I. Epstein-Barr virus-specific defects.

    S Harada;K Sakamoto;J K Seeley;T Lindsten

  • Summary: Symposium on Epstein-Barr Virus-induced Lymphoproliferative Diseases in Immunodeficient Patients

    George Klein;David Purtilo

  • Rapid detection of cytomegalovirus by tissue culture, centrifugation, and immunofluorescence with a monoclonal antibody to an early nuclear antigen.

    Geoffrey M. Thiele;Molly S. Bicak;Anita Young;Joyce Kinsey

  • Immune deficiency in the X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome. II. Immunoregulatory T cell defects.

    T Lindsten;J K Seeley;M Ballow;K Sakamoto

Frequent Co-Authors

George Klein
George Klein Karolinska Institute
John L. Sullivan
John L. Sullivan University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Thomas Bechtold
Thomas Bechtold University of Innsbruck
Dennis D. Weisenburger
Dennis D. Weisenburger University of Nebraska Medical Center
Mark Ballow
Mark Ballow University of South Florida
David J. Volsky
David J. Volsky Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Gary R. Pearson
Gary R. Pearson Georgetown University
Gertrude Henle
Gertrude Henle Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Alan F. List
Alan F. List Precision BioSciences
Richard L. Simmons
Richard L. Simmons University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Immunology in the USA opens doors to various related healthcare careers, many of which can be pursued through online education. For those interested in nursing, identifying the easiest accelerated nursing programs can provide a faster route to becoming a registered nurse while balancing other commitments.

Similarly, if you’re looking to start your nursing career with a practical focus, the which lpn programs are easiest to get into resource can help you find practical nursing programs that are accessible and efficient.

For advanced roles in patient care, many students consider online pathways like the easiest online nurse practitioner programs. These programs often offer flexibility and accelerated options to help you specialize quickly.

Specializing further in mental health is also a growing field. The best online psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner programs highlight top programs that ensure excellent clinical placements, preparing graduates for crucial roles in psychiatric care.

Each of these educational pathways complements a foundation in Immunology, expanding career opportunities and helping students tailor their professional goals effectively.

Best Scientists Citing David T. Purtilo

Recently Published Articles